Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • Cedars-Sinai doctors oversee incredibly rare birth
    A family made up of a mother, father, a teenage child and a newborn baby pose for a photo. The mother is wearing hospital scrubs, and the baby has a breathing tube.
    Suze and Andrew Lopez pose with their teenage daughter Kaila and their newborn son Ryu, who was born after an intensive procedure at Cedars-Sinai this August.

    Topline:

    Andrew and Suze Lopez of Bakersfield welcomed their newborn son Ryu at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles on Aug.18, 2025, against some of the highest medical odds that the couple’s doctors had ever seen.

    How it happened: Suze had a 22-pound cyst that her doctors had been monitoring, though she was keeping it and her remaining ovary to avoid early menopause and in hopes of having another child. Behind that cyst, unbeknownst to her, a viable but incredibly rare and dangerous pregnancy managed to develop outside of her uterus.

    Why it was so unlikely: The baby had developed far outside the mother’s uterus, in her abdomen. Doctors typically recommend the termination of these pregnancies due to the high risk of complications for mother and child.

    About the delivery: It took a large interdisciplinary team of surgeons, anesthesiologists, and neonatologists, among others, working under intense pressure to make sure everything went off without a hitch. Suze’s doctor John Ozimek said the odds of this outcome were “far, far less than one in a million.”

    The parents’ takeaway: “ I think of life so differently,” Suze said. “I just appreciate everything — everything. Even if it's the baby crying, because that just means that his lungs work, they function, they can breathe.”

    Andrew and Suze Lopez of Bakersfield welcomed their newborn son Ryu at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles on Aug.18, 2025, against some of the highest medical odds that the couple’s doctors had ever seen.

    Suze had an abdominal ectopic pregnancy, in which a fertilized egg develops outside the uterus in the abdomen. According to the team that treated her, the odds of a viable pregnancy developing so far away from Suze’s uterus, let alone with few complications for mother and child, are “far less than one in a million.”

    The Lopezes are celebrating the extraordinarily unlikely healthy birth of their newest child thanks to the work of a massive team of specialists and, in part, a well-timed visit to L.A. for a Dodgers game.

    “ I credit it all to God of course, because he gave us such a miracle,” Suze told LAist.

    Discovering the pregnancy

    Suze had long been living with an ovarian cyst that made pregnancy very unlikely, especially because she’d already had her other ovary and cyst removed.

    At first, Suze didn’t want to have the growing cyst removed for two reasons. Removing it meant that she would have gone through unwanted hormonal changes due to early menopause, and she was holding onto a sliver of hope that her teenage daughter Kaila might not end up an only child.

    “ My daughter was always like, ‘Hey, let's have a brother or sister,’” Suze said. “And I was like, ‘Sorry, just not happening.’ And I kind of just accepted it.”

    Suze was finally starting to make plans to have the cyst removed, having “almost given up” on having a second child. At that point the cyst weighed 22 pounds. A routine pregnancy test ahead of a scheduled CT scan came back positive. But Suze, an emergency room nurse herself, knew false positives were possible due to a number of factors. Two more pregnancy tests came back positive. Follow up exams revealed a femur behind her cyst and blood flow in what appeared to be a developing fetus.

    At that moment, Suze knew she had a viable pregnancy.

    The Dodgers game

    Suze broke the good news to Andrew at a Dodgers game. Andrew was just about to start his final semester as a nursing student, and the couple was there to celebrate. (Andrew said it was Aug. 15 — Demon Slayer hat night, for the record.) With Suze’s news, the couple had one more thing to commemorate.

    But on that same trip, Suze started to feel abdominal pain — unbeknownst to her at the time, the baby she was carrying was already full term, mostly hidden behind the large cyst.

    The couple quickly decided to go to Cedars-Sinai Hospital.

    Cedars-Sinai earlier this year became the first hospital in California to be considered a Level IV Maternal Care hospital, the highest level of obstetric and maternal care given by the Joint Commission. And with a case this rare, specialists across several departments were needed to deliver the baby successfully.

    The gravity of the situation

    Dr. John Ozimek, Cedars-Sinai’s director of labor and delivery, was on call when Suze came into the hospital.

    In addition to her abdominal pain, Suze had abnormally high blood pressure as an additional complicating factor. Knowing of Suze’s positive pregnancy test, Ozimek soon set out to get to the bottom of the issues.

    “ Finally, I put the probe back way far away, somewhere where you would never see a baby,” said Ozimek. “And I started to see parts of a baby.”

    Ozimek first noticed a femur, then the baby’s cranium. He measured the size — and only then did he realize how complicated the situation was about to become.

    “I looked at her and I looked at her husband, Andrew, and I said, ‘Guys, you're full term. This is a full term pregnancy,’” he said.

    In fact, Ozimek said that Ryu would’ve been well past the due date doctors would’ve given Suze if she had exhibited any symptoms of pregnancy.

    Ozimek credited the Lopezes’ trusting attitude, and their knowledge of the medical profession, with helping the doctors conduct each test and procedure smoothly.

    “ I am extremely grateful to her and to Andrew for putting their trust in us, not knowing who we were and essentially recommending this really risky and extreme surgery in less than 24 hours of meeting her,” Ozimek said.

    With the extremely precarious surgery on the books, neonatal intensive care unit experts, anesthesiologists, and nurse practitioners, among others, then jumped into action.

    The birth

    Delivering a full-term abdominal ectopic pregnancy is exceedingly rare, and the team at Cedars-Sinai and the Lopezes had to think through all the contingencies before the operation.

    “If we saw distress, we would do an emergency delivery and get the baby out,” Ozimek said. “Under most circumstances, that's OK. But in this circumstance, that would put her life in extreme danger.”

    Because of the complexity of the procedure, doctors made the decision to put Suze under general anesthesia, which is generally not recommended. And so the work began.

    First, Suze’s cyst was removed to allow doctors to access the baby. And even though Ozimek knew roughly what to expect beneath the cyst, he was still floored.

    “ What we saw in there was just something you will never see in your life as a maternal fetal medicine specialist or as an obstetrician,” Ozimek said. “It's this eight pound baby — more than 8 pounds — laying directly in her abdomen. The head was up directly underneath the spleen. His little bottom was resting on top of her very tiny unpregnant uterus.”

    Doctors quickly lifted Ryu out and began taking care of other tasks, like removing the placenta from Suze’s abdomen.

    Suze started to hemorrhage blood during the intensive procedure, which Ozimek said the team had anticipated. Surgeons worked to control the bleeding, and anesthesiologists jumped in to give her blood transfusions to keep Suze stable. She lost 4.7 liters of blood all told, according to Ozimek, almost her whole blood volume.

    Since Ryu was born without fluid in his amniotic sac, his lung development was a major concern. As the effects of the anesthesia wore off, Ryu proved to be a feisty, vocal baby. Doctors removed his breathing tube less than 24 hours after putting it in, and he continued to exhibit promising signs throughout the whole time he was in the ICU.

    Against all odds, the delivery went off as planned without any major complications. Even Suze bounced back quickly from her procedure so she could focus on spending time with her surprise.

    “ People use the word miracle and all the time for different things, and I don't — I mean, it's just who I am, I don't,” Ozimek said. “This is as close to it as I can imagine it, it really is. I think about it all the time.”

    Post operation

    The Lopezes named their baby Ryu for two reasons. The name pays tribute to former Dodgers pitcher Hyun-jin Ryu — a nod to where Andrew found out about the pregnancy — and also the Street Fighter character Ryu, a nod to the spirit and tenacity that his parents felt he had demonstrated.

    “He fought through all these odds and it's just unbelievable,” Andrew said. “ We thought it was very fitting for him to have a fighter name and to also match where I found out we were gonna have this wonderful miracle.”

    Ryu stayed in the care of neonatologists at Cedars-Sinai for about two weeks then recovered with Suze at the nearby Ronald McDonald House. After making the drive back and forth from Bakersfield in order to complete his last semester, Andrew celebrated his graduation from nursing school last week.

    In the months since Ryu’s birth on Aug. 18, Suze, Andrew, Ryu and Kaila have been able to fall into a new rhythm as a family of four as they get ready to celebrate their first holidays together.

    “ I think of life so differently,” Suze said. “I just appreciate everything — everything. Even if it's the baby crying, because that just means that his lungs work, they function, they can breathe.”

  • LAUSD school rebuilds underway
    A child with light skin tone and curly blonde hair walks across a playground with blue structures.
    Marquez Charter Elementary reopened to students with temporary classrooms and new playgrounds Sept. 30, 2025.

    Topline:

    By the end of January, students will have returned to two of the three public school campuses burned in the Palisades Fire one year prior. The buildings are still in progress, but Los Angeles Unified's superintendent promised they’ll be complete in 2028.

    The backstory: The 2025 fire destroyed two Los Angeles Unified elementary schools— Marquez and Palisades— and damaged Palisades Charter High School, an independently run school on district property.

    Where are the students: 

    • Palisades Charter High School students are scheduled to return to their campus on Jan. 27. They’ve been in a refurbished Santa Monica department store since April. 
    • Marquez Elementary students returned in September to portables covering about one-third of the campus.  
    • Palisades Elementary students continue to share a campus with Brentwood Science Magnet. 

    What’s next: In June, the LAUSD Board approved a $604 million plan to rebuild the three burned schools. District-contracted architects are finalizing their designs and plan to submit to the state for approval in the spring.  The district plans to use money from the $9 billion bond voters approved in 2024 to help pay for the rebuild, but also anticipates reimbursement from its insurer and FEMA.

    By the end of January, students will have returned to two of the three public school campuses burned in the Palisades Fire one year prior, though their classrooms are temporary.

    Palisades Charter High School students are scheduled to return to their campus Jan. 27. They’ve been in a refurbished Santa Monica department store since April.

    “ I am just overwhelmed with gratitude for the constant support that has been shown for our school and for our families, our teachers, all of our administrators and staff,” said Principal Pamela Magee at a press conference Tuesday with Los Angeles Unified leaders. Pali High is an independent charter high school located on district property.

    In June, the LAUSD Board approved a $604 million plan to rebuild the high school, as well as two burned district elementary schools— Marquez and Palisades.

    Superintendent Alberto Carvalho said the three campuses’ new buildings will open in 2028— shaving two years off of the original 5-year timeline.

    “ These projects will come in on time or ahead of schedule,” Carvalho said. “These projects will come in at or below budget, and these projects will honor the resilience, the determination, the courage and yes, the suffering and the sacrifice of the community of the Palisades.”

    About the costs and the design

    The district plans to use money from the $9 billion bond voters approved in 2024 to help pay for the rebuild, but also anticipates some reimbursement from its insurer and FEMA.

    District-contracted architects are finalizing their designs and plan to submit to the state for approval in the spring, said Chief Facilities Executive Krisztina Tokes. She said the plan is to rebuild with future environmental risks in mind.

    “ From the earliest design stages, wildfire resiliency has been treated as a core requirement and not an add-on,” Tokes said. For example, using fire-resistant concrete blocks, installing enhanced air filtration systems and planting shade trees where they won’t hang over buildings.

    Environmental testing preceded students’ return to the fire-impacted campuses. Director of the Office of Environmental Health and Safety Carlos Torres said the district continues to monitor air quality through its network of sensors and is developing a plan for periodic testing.

    “We just can't just walk away,” Torres said.

    Enrollment is down at all three schools compared to before the fires, but district leaders say they are confident families will return to the rebuilt campuses.

    “I find it hard to believe that this community won't come back to its former glory,” said Board Member Nick Melvoin, who represents the Palisades. “We gave a lot of thought in an accelerated timeline to rebuilding for the next century.”

    Marquez Charter Elementary

    What’s the damage? The campus is a “total loss.” More than three dozen classrooms, administration buildings, the school’s auditorium and playground burned down.

    How much has LAUSD budgeted to rebuild? $202.6 million

    Where are the students? Students returned in September to portables covering about one-third of the campus. There’s also two playgrounds, a garden, library and shaded lunch area. Enrollment has dropped 60% compared to before the fire from 310 to 127 students.

    What’s next? District-contracted architects are finalizing their designs and plan to submit to the state for approval in the spring.

    A group of elementary school aged students sit in a circle on gray carpet. A woman with light skin tone and long brown hair pulled back leans in to the center of the circle.
    Palisades Charter Elementary School teacher Ms. Davison talks with her students in their new classroom on the campus of Brentwood Elementary Science Magnet last year.
    (
    Brian van der Brug
    /
    Los Angeles Times via Getty Images
    )

    Palisades Charter Elementary

    What’s the damage? About 70% of the campus was destroyed including 17 classrooms, the multipurpose room and play equipment.

    How much has LAUSD budgeted to rebuild? $135 million

    Where are the students? Students continue to share a campus with Brentwood Science Magnet. Enrollment has dropped 25% compared to before the fire from 410 to 307 students.

    What’s next? District-contracted architects are finalizing their designs and plan to submit to the state for approval in the spring.

    A white building with PALI and four images of dolphins in blue. There are blue skies and hills in the background.
    Palisades Charter High School, pictured in December 2025, is scheduled to reopen to students Jan. 27, 2026.
    (
    Kayla Bartkowski
    /
    Los Angeles Times via Getty Images
    )

    Palisades Charter High School

    What’s the damage? About 30% of the campus was destroyed including 21 classrooms, storage facilities and the track and field.

    How much has LAUSD budgeted to rebuild? $266 million

    Where are the students? Students started the school year in a renovated Sears building in downtown Santa Monica. Enrollment has dropped 14% compared to before the fire, from 2,900 to 2,500 students.

    What’s next? Classes will resume at the main campus Tues. Jan. 27 in a combination of surviving buildings and 30 new portable classrooms.

  • Sponsored message
  • Astrophysicist Ray Jayawardhana to lead university
    Ray Jayawardhana, the incoming president of Caltech, speaking at a podium during an announcement ceremony at The Athenaeum in Pasadena. He is wearing a dark suit and patterned tie, standing in front of a large orange backdrop featuring the Caltech logo.
    Incoming Caltech president Ray Jayawardhana speaks during an announcement ceremony at Caltech in Pasadena on Tuesday.

    Topline:

    Caltech has selected astrophysicist and Johns Hopkins University provost Ray Jayawardhana as its next president.

    Who he is: According to his introduction video, Jayawardhana goes by "Ray Jay."

    His academic work in astronomy explores how planets and stars form, evolve and differ from each other. He's part of a team that works with the James Webb Space Telescope to observe and characterize so-called exoplanets — planets around other stars — with an eye toward the potential for life beyond Earth.

    In addition to his time as provost at Johns Hopkins, where he oversees the university's 10 schools, Jayawardhana has also taught at Cornell University, the University of Toronto and the University of Michigan and also had a research fellowship at the University of California, Berkeley. He got his undergraduate degree at Yale and earned his Ph.D. at Harvard.

    Why now: In April, current Caltech President Thomas F. Rosenbaum announced he'd retire after the 2025-26 academic year. Rosenbaum has led the university for the past 12 years.

    What's next: Jayawardhana will step into his new role July 1.

  • Trump admin plans to halt billions to CA
    President Donald Trump speaks during a White House event to announce new tariffs April 2, 2025.

    Topline:

    The Trump administration says it’s planning to freeze about $10 billion in federal support for needy families in California and four other Democrat-run states, as the president announced an investigation into unspecified fraud in California.

    The backstory: The plans come on the heels of the Trump administration announcing a freeze on all federal payments for child care in Minnesota, citing fraud allegations against daycare centers in the state.

    The potential impact on California: The plans call for California, Minnesota, New York, Illinois and Colorado to lose about $7 billion in cash assistance for households with children, almost $2.4 billion to care for children of working parents, and about $870 million for social services grants that mostly benefit children at risk, according to unnamed federal officials speaking to the New York Times and New York Post.

    Read on ... for more on the fraud allegations and Gov. Gavin Newsom's response.

    The Trump administration says it’s planning to freeze about $10 billion in federal support for needy families in California and four other Democrat-run states, as the president announced an investigation into unspecified fraud in California.

    The plans come on the heels of the Trump administration announcing a freeze on all federal payments for child care in Minnesota, citing fraud allegations against daycare centers in the state.

    The state’s Democrat governor, Tim Walz — who ran for vice president against Donald Trump’s ticket in 2024 — announced Monday he was dropping out of running for reelection. He pointed to fraud against the state, saying it’s a real issue while alleging Trump and his allies were “seeking to take advantage of the crisis.”

    On Monday, the New York Post reported that the administration was expanding the funding freeze to include California and three other Democrat-led states, in addition to Minnesota. Unnamed federal officials cited “concerns that the benefits were fraudulently funneled to non-citizens,” The Post reported.

    Early Tuesday, President Trump alleged that corruption in California is worse than Minnesota and announced an investigation.

    “California, under Governor Gavin Newscum, is more corrupt than Minnesota, if that’s possible??? The Fraud Investigation of California has begun. Thank you for your attention to this matter! PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP,” the president wrote on his social media platform Truth Social.

    He did not specify what alleged fraud was being examined in the Golden State.

    LAist has reached out to the White House to ask what the president’s fraud concerns are in California and to request an interview with the president.

    “For too long, Democrat-led states and governors have been complicit in allowing massive amounts of fraud to occur under their watch,” said an emailed statement from Andrew Nixon, a spokesperson for U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, which administers the federal childcare funds.

    “Under the Trump administration, we are ensuring that federal taxpayer dollars are being used for legitimate purposes. We will ensure these states are following the law and protecting hard-earned taxpayer money.”

    Gov. Gavin Newsom’s press office disputed Trump’s claim on social media, arguing that since taking office, the governor has blocked $125 billion in fraud and arrested “criminal parasites leaching off of taxpayers.”

    Criminal fraud cases in CA appear to be rare for this program

    Defrauding federally funded programs is a crime — and one LAist has investigated, leading to one of the largest such criminal cases in recent years against a California elected official, which surrounded meal funds.

    When it comes to the federal childcare funds that are being frozen, the dollar amount of fraud alleged in criminal cases appears to be a tiny fraction of the overall program’s spending in California.

    A search of thousands of news releases by all four federal prosecutor offices in California, going back more than a decade, found a total of one criminal case where the press releases referenced childcare benefits.

    That case, brought in 2023, alleged four men stole $3.7 million in federal childcare benefits through fraudulent requests to a San Diego organization that distributed the funds. All four pleaded guilty, with one defendant sentenced to 27 months in prison and others sentenced to other terms, according to authorities.

    It appears to be equivalent to one one-hundredth of 1% of all the childcare funding California has received over the past decade-plus covered by the prosecution press release search.

    Potential impact on California families

    The plans call for California, Minnesota, New York, Illinois and Colorado to lose about $7 billion in cash assistance for households with children, almost $2.4 billion to care for children of working parents, and about $870 million for social services grants that mostly benefit children at risk, according to unnamed federal officials speaking to the New York Times and New York Post.

    In the largest category of funding, California receives $3.7 billion per year. The program is known as Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, or TANF.

     ”It's very clear that a freeze of those funds would be very damaging to the children, families, and providers of California,” said Stacy Lee, who oversees early childhood initiatives "at Children Now, an advocacy group for children in California.

     ”It is a significant portion of our funds and will impact families and children and providers across the whole state,” she added. “It would be devastating, in no uncertain terms.”

    About 270,000 people are served by the TANF program in L.A. County — about 200,000 of whom are children, according to the county Department of Public Social Services.

    “Any pause in funding for their cash benefits – which average $1000/month - would be devastating to these families,” said DPSS chief of staff Nick Ippolito.

    Ippolito said the department has a robust fraud prevention and 170-person investigations team, and takes allegations “very seriously.”

    It remains to be seen whether the funding freeze will end up in court. The state, as well as major cities and counties in California, has sued to ask judges to halt funding freezes or new requirements placed by the Trump administration. L.A. city officials say they’ve had success with that, including shielding more than $600 million in federal grant funding to the city last year.

    A union representing California childcare workers said the funding freeze would harm low-income families.

    “These threats need to be called out for what they are: direct threats on working families of all backgrounds who rely on access to quality, affordable child care in their communities to go to work every day supporting, and growing our economy,” said Max Arias, chairperson for the Child Care Providers United, which says it represents more than 70,000 child care workers across the state who care for kids in their homes.

    “Funding freezes, even when intended to be temporary, will be devastating — resulting in families losing access to care and working parents facing the devastating choice of keeping their children safe or paying their bills.”

    How to reach me

    If you have a tip, you can reach me on Signal. My username is ngerda.47.

    Federal officials planned to send letters to the affected states Monday about the planned funding pauses, the New York Post reported. As of 3 p.m. Tuesday, state officials said they haven’t gotten any official notification of the funding freeze plans.

    “The California Department of Social Services administers child care programs that help working families afford safe, reliable care for their children — so parents can go to work, support their families, and contribute to their communities,” said a statement from California Department of Social Services spokesperson Jason Montiel.

    “These funds are critical for working families across California. We take fraud seriously, and CDSS has received no information from the federal government indicating any freeze, pause, or suspension of federal child care funding.”

  • CA is investing in housing for fire survivors
    The charred remains of what used to be the interior of a home, with a stone fireplace sticking out from the rubble.
    A home destroyed in the Eaton Fire on Jan. 8.

    Topline:

    California is investing $107.3 million in affordable housing in L.A. County to help fire survivors and target the region’s housing crisis.

    What we know: In an announcement Tuesday, the state said the money will fund nine projects with 673 new affordable rental homes specifically for communities impacted by the January fires.

    Where will these projects go? The homes will not replace destroyed ones or be built on burn scar areas, according to Gov. Gavin Newsom’s office. The idea is to build in cities like Claremont, Covina, Santa Monica and Pasadena to create multiple affordable housing communities across the county.

    Officials say: “We are rebuilding stronger, fairer communities in Los Angeles without displacing the people who call these neighborhoods home,” Newsom said in a statement. “More affordable homes across the county means survivors can stay near their schools, jobs and support systems, and all Angelenos are better able to afford housing in these vibrant communities.”

    Dig deeper into how Los Angeles is remembering the anniversary of the fires.