Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • What happens when the panels wear out?
    Several rows of solar panels wrapped in blue plastic are stacked high on pallets

    Topline:

    The world is seeing a huge push for solar power. But what happens when those panels wear out? A handful of solar recyclers are working toward solutions — but the vast majority of worn solar panels winds up in landfills.

    Why it matters: The country is installing solar panels at record rates. An International Renewable Energy Agency report says that in the next few decades the world could see up to 78 million metric tons of solar waste. To put that in perspective, that’s about 5 million school buses.

    The obstacles: There are no federal requirements for recycling solar panels, and states have different regulations for what to do with them, The vast majority of panels are thrown away in landfills — only about 10% are recycled. And people who are recycling are dealing with a patchwork system with a lot of organizations.

    This story was originally published by Grist. Sign up for Grist’s weekly newsletter here.

    Grist is a nonprofit, independent media organization dedicated to telling stories of climate solutions and a just future.

    This coverage is made possible through a partnership with Grist and Interlochen Public Radio in Northern Michigan.

    In 2019, the nonprofit Michigan Energy Options had just put up a solar farm in the city of East Lansing — in a dump.

    “It was a closed dump,” said John Kinch, the solar company’s executive director. “There was grass and some flowers and weeds growing there. “

    As part of the project, Kinch and his colleagues restored the land around the newly installed panels.

    “We took all the junky grasses and things that were not native, got rid of it all and planted all native prairie and wildflower species to Michigan,” he said. “It’s a beautiful sight right now.”

    But one day, Kinch was out there admiring the work, when a thought entered his mind: “Holy cow, when we’re done with this project, am I going to remove a thousand solar panels from a landfill and go put them underground in a landfill somewhere else?”

    The world is seeing a huge push for solar power. But what happens when those panels wear out?

    About 12 years ago, a woman named Annick Anctil was working at the Brookhaven National Laboratory in New York. She was researching the environmental impact of solar, and she became interested in making this renewable energy more sustainable.

    At her next job, she decided to go further: “The first thing I did when I started in academia after my postdoc was to write a proposal about looking at the end of life of solar modules and the need for recycling and sustainability.”

    But, she said, other people weren’t on board.

    “The response to that proposal was just, ‘Well, that’s not a problem. And it’s not going to be a problem for a long time. So we’re not going to fund that,’” she recalled.

    Anctil submitted another proposal a few years later, and was rejected again.

    Around that same time, interest in solar waste was starting to pick up. The country was installing panels at record rates. And in 2016, the International Renewable Energy Agency released a big report, saying that in the next few decades the world could see up to 78 million metric tons of solar waste. To put that in perspective, that’s about 5 million school buses.

    That estimate has fluctuated over the years as solar has advanced. The National Renewable Energy Laboratory now estimates waste could reach between 54 and 160 million metric tons.

    By 2021, Anctil’s research was finally funded. And she’s been working on that ever since as an associate professor of civil and environmental engineering at Michigan State University.

    “Looking at the waste part, for me, that’s part of the full life cycle of the solar panels,” she said. “As soon as we start thinking about a product, we should think about what’s going to happen to them when we’re done with it.”

    A person holds a handful of fine powder that is sifting through their gloves
    Crushed glass from a recycled solar panel, ready for reuse in new products.
    (
    SolarCycle
    )

    To understand solar recycling, it’s helpful to know where the panels begin.

    Most solar panels are made in China. Those blue rectangles that convert sunlight to electricity are covered in big sheets of high-quality glass and plastic polymer. Those rectangles are usually made of silicon, which is basically a pure form of sand. Panels can also contain copper, silver and other metals. An aluminum frame holds it together.

    The solar life cycle is intertwined with human rights. There have been charges of abuses in mining and manufacturing for solar that gets shipped to countries including the United States. And a report by the London-based Business and Human Rights Resource Centre said the U.S. is among the countries that have failed to provide environmental and labor safeguards for the workers doing the mining, allegedly leading to a slew of violations, like polluting drinking water.

    Last year, Reuters reported that U.S. Customs and Border Patrol had seized solar equipment shipments because of concerns about ties to slave labor in Uyghur detention camps in northern China.

    “There’s a lot of illegal mining,” said Anctil, who co-authored a Science Direct report on the carbon footprint of silicon production last year. “There’s also concern that some country might import high quality sand from another country using illegal mining.”

    Most solar has been installed in the last decade, and that pace is expected to continue, as it becomes cheaper due to federal incentives, new technology and higher demand. Many of those panels are meant to last for at least 25 to 30 years, and could produce power for much longer. Eventually, that will pile up and we’ll need to dispose of them.

    But there are no federal requirements for recycling solar panels, and states have different regulations for what to do with them. Panels can also contain small amounts of heavy metals like lead, which makes getting rid of them more complicated. The vast majority of panels are thrown away in landfills — only about 10 percent are recycled. And people who are recycling are dealing with a patchwork system with a lot of organizations.

    Solar recycling companies are part of that configuration. Some are in the Great Lakes region, but panels are also shipped to big facilities thousands of miles away.

    Jesse Simons helped found the California recycling company Solarcycle last year, and is the company’s chief commercial officer. He said the first step is sending out a team to determine whether panels can be reused instead of recycled at their facility in Texas.

    Once the panels arrive at the facility, they’re put on a machine.

    “A robot, essentially, pops the frame off,” Simons said.

    Panels are hard to take apart. They’re fused together in a kind of sandwich of glass, silicon, and plastic polymer, built to withstand decades outdoors, and specialized recycling systems are needed to recover valuable materials.

    Once the glass is removed, there’s the laminate.

    “It really does, at that point, roll up like a yoga mat,” Simons said. “It’s like a very thin piece. But that’s where most of the value is currently. Something like 80 percent of the value of the panel is now in the 8 percent of the weight that is in that yoga mat-like laminate.”

    They put the laminate in a shredder, where it’s ground down to the size of sand.

    “Then we’ve got another machine that basically uses electromagnetic processes to separate the valuable metals from the remaining plastic and glass,” he said.

    At the end of the whole process, they’re left with around five pounds of plastic, which they’re trying to find a way to reuse.

    So why isn’t everyone recycling?

    Well, it’s still expensive. The National Renewable Energy Laboratory estimates that it can cost between $15 to $45 to recycle a panel, but just a few dollars to throw it away.

    Getting panels to recycling facilities is another factor. The company We Recycle Solar actually has regional warehouses in places like Chicago, where they store panels until there are enough to justify shipping them to their center in Arizona.

    The solar recycling industry is expected to grow as technology improves, waste accumulates and demand for materials goes up. And people like John Gilkeson, from Minnesota’s Pollution Control Agency, say this transition can’t be left to the free market and industry alone.

    “That’s called wish-cycling,” he said. “Because the market will drive to the cheapest option, which is going to be landfilling. We have had many conversations with larger energy providers who say, ‘We’ll do the right thing.’ And we say, ‘What is the right thing? And when it really happens, will you do it?’ And then we get no response. Because people are not going to do anything that they do not have to do.”

    Gilkeson said policy is key to dealing with any kind of waste, including solar. He’d like to see reuse and recycling take-back programs that are funded ahead of time and supported by the industry, along with federal efforts. And he thinks we should start working on that now.

    “Deliberate, intentional action is needed to make this happen,” he said. “Otherwise, you’ve got thousands of actors all doing whatever they think is in their own self-interest. And it’s not going to be a coordinated reuse and recycling system.”

  • No cohesive policy in place
    A close up of a ChatGPT icon on a smartphone, with the words ChatGPT in the background.
    Faculty and students say UC schools don't have a consistent approach to AI use.

    Topline:

    Years after generative artificial intelligence software became widely accessible, the University of California system still does not have a systemwide approach to how AI is used in classrooms. “The situation is contradictory and also extraordinarily fluid,” professor Rita Raley told the university system’s Board of Regents on Wednesday. “In one class, students are permitted to use AI, in another, they're cautioned against it, and in a third, they're told it's prohibited.”

    What comes next for the UCs: The University of California has an AI steering committee tasked with “developing a coordinated approach that allows UC to use its systemwide scale while recognizing the distinct needs of its campuses, medical centers, laboratories, faculty, researchers, staff, and students,” according to a University of California spokesperson.

    Keep reading: For more faculty and student thoughts on AI use at UC schools.

    Years after generative artificial intelligence software became widely accessible, the University of California system still does not have a consistent approach to how AI is used in classrooms, according to its faculty and students.

    “The situation is contradictory and also extraordinarily fluid,” professor Rita Raley told the university system’s Board of Regents on Wednesday. “In one class, students are permitted to use AI, in another, they're cautioned against it, and in a third, they're told it's prohibited.”

    Raley, a professor of English at UC Santa Barbara, heads the breakout group that will define what AI literacy means for UC, and will make recommendations on how to cultivate AI in classrooms across the UCs. The big question the working group is grappling with, Raley said: What every student needs to know about artificial intelligence.

    “If we are indeed moving toward automated education, then we have to ask what a UC degree will mean. It will have to mean more than skills because these too can be automated,” she said. “... [W]e must now give students the critical judgment to ask what this technology is, who needs to be accountable for it, how to use it, when to refuse it, and what it could be instead.”

    Jayha Buhs-Jackson, UCLA’s undergraduate student body president, says she does not like AI, so she does not use it.

    She agreed that the university does not have a “succinct” AI policy. Some of her professors, Buhs-Jackson said, strictly do not allow AI in the classroom; others allow it for research and coding.

    She said UCLA has its own internal AI committee, which she was just appointed to.

    “ I'm curious to see … how I could use my voice as president to discuss and uplift the undergraduate student voice related to AI at UCLA,” she said.

    UC vs CSU approach

    The UC system currently does not have a single systemwide AI product or mandatory AI protocols in place.

    Instead, “eligible employees have access to frontier AI tools from a variety of vendors including OpenAI, Microsoft and Google. Access is intended to support activities such as analysis, research, learning, and operational efficiency,” a University of California spokesperson said.

    The university system also has a Master Service Agreement in place with OpenAI, but it does not include a minimum spend commitment or prepurchased licenses. Schools under the UC umbrella can purchase OpenAI products through the agreement.

    UC’s approach stands in contrast to the one California State University took.

    In 2025, the nation’s largest public university system signed a nearly $17 million contract with OpenAI and made a suite of ChatGPT tools available to all its faculty and students.

    At the time, CSU spokesperson Amy Bentley-Smith told LAist, the goal was for all students to have “the same access to the tools and learning opportunities that will prepare them for the future,” regardless of which campus they attend.

    Still, the rollout was heavily criticized as students and faculty were left on their own to figure out how to use AI. And in a 2025 survey of CSU students, over 60% said AI has negatively affected their learning experience.

    What's the best approach for schools?

    The different approaches taken by California’s public university systems demonstrate that higher education is still grappling with how to confront — or embrace — this technology.

    Universities across the nation have to find ways to work with AI, said Justin Reich, a digital media professor of digital media and the director of the Teaching Systems Lab at MIT.

    We don't want our brains to atrophy while we're trying to get better at what we're doing.
    — Stephanie Valadez, UCLA student

    But we also do not have a framework for what to do or how to implement AI in higher education, he added.

     ”The right strategy is to come up with a systematic series of experiments, where you're testing hypotheses, in particular, by looking at student learning experiences and student learning outcomes,” Reich said.

    The University of California’s AI steering committee overall is tasked with “developing a coordinated approach that allows UC to use its systemwide scale while recognizing the distinct needs of its campuses, medical centers, laboratories, faculty, researchers, staff, and students,” according to a University of California spokesperson.

    Reich said it is great that the University of California has multiple voices involved in the steering committee.

    “I  would encourage any university system to have students play a central role in directing their AI response pretty much at all levels,” he said. “Especially in a system as complex as UC, where you have so many students that have so many different kinds of expertise.”

    The UC AI steering committee has one student voice on it. Stephanie Valadez, an ethnomusicology graduate student at UCLA and president of the UC graduate and professional student council, says she would like to see more. She’s concerned about the environmental impact of AI and the negative impact on “underrepresented communities that are living near these data centers,” she said.

    In the classroom, she hasn’t had to use AI.

    “ All of my professors say, ‘Don't use AI. Just don't use ChatGPT, don't use Claude, don't use any of that stuff,’ for multiple reasons,” she said. “Being in the music department, as an artist, we also are very conscious of having our work stolen, having what we produce then go on to train AI.”

    The training a Ph.D. student is seeking, Valadez said, you would not get from AI.

    “ We don't want our brains to atrophy while we're trying to get better at what we're doing,” she said.

    What comes next for UC

    UC San Diego and UC Irvine, Valadez said, have rolled out TritonGPT and ZotGPT, but she’s heard from other board members that students aren’t using  the AI tools as much as the university would like them to, adding that there has been “a lot of pushback from students.”

    James Milliken, the University of California president, said the committee’s guiding principle is AI “for humans and for humanity” and how it “ can advance human potential, not diminish it.”

    The committee had its first meeting in June, where five working groups were created to explore how to use AI in clinical research, curriculum development and “public benefit” among other things.

    Come October 2027, the committee will come to Milliken with a proposal for a UC sovereign AI cloud. This means UC could have its own hardware and processing power to build, run and train AI models.

  • Sponsored message
  • A year later, how are film and TV workers faring?
    Several people stand around California Governor Gavin Newsom, speaking at a podium with a sign on it that reads "Lights, Camera, Jobs" in white letters on a blue background. Above them is a ceiling of exposed wooden beams and they're standing on a plywood floor of what appears to be a soundstage.
    California Governor Gavin Newsom speaks at a news conference, where he announced a major expansion of the state's film and TV tax credit program, raising the cap to $750 million in an effort to keep entertainment productions in California, at the Ranch Lot Studios in Burbank, California on July 2, 2025.

    Topline:

    In 2025, California majorly boosted its film and TV tax credit program for the first time since 2014 in an effort to keep jobs in the Golden State. One year out, we asked film and TV workers in Los Angeles how they're faring.

    The responses:

    • Chineza Ezinkwo, production coordinator/supervisor: “It feels incredibly uncertain, but I will say there's more hope these past two years than there was certainly [in] the past three or four years.”
    • Pam Elyea, prop house owner: “Are we at where we were before? No. But we certainly are so much better, and so it kind of gives you hope moving forward.”
    • Andrea Wheeler, costumer: "Everybody is on eggshells. Everybody's just like, "Oh, thank God we're working. ... You feel like you're in a dying industry right now."

    Read on ... for more on the state of the entertainment industry in Los Angeles.

    “Was it like this during the Great Depression?”

    It’s a question that prop house owner Pam Elyea says she’s asked herself in recent years, as the film and TV industry has weathered multiple hits — the pandemic, the dual industry strikes of 2023, the 2025 fires — and a loss of production jobs to other states and countries that began decades ago.

    Elyea, along with her husband Jim, opened History for Hire, a prop house in North Hollywood, in 1985. Before the pandemic, they had a staff of 20 people, but now employ only nine full-time employees.

    “As an employer and a business owner, the feeling you're always trying to overcome is that feeling of weariness,” Elyea says. “ That it was just dragging on and on, and there's really no big hope in sight.”

    ‘It got everybody excited’

    Elyea says she was heartened by the boost to California’s film and TV tax incentive program in July of 2025 — from $330 million to $750 million: “It got everybody excited."

    Elyea says she started to see positive effects sooner than she expected, about three months in, first with new TV productions that were tax credit recipients coming to History for Hire for props, and more recently feature films.

    A group of five people pose for a picture outside the U.S. Capitol building. The sky is blue and cloudless around the dome of the building.
    Members of the Set Decorators Society of America in Washington, D.C., lobbying for a federal film and TV tax incentive on September 16, 2026.
    (
    Courtesy of Pam Elyea
    )

    She’s also now lobbying for a new federal film and TV tax incentive, which President Donald Trump recently said he’d support.

    “Are we at where we were before? No,” she says. “But we certainly are so much better, and so it kind of gives you hope moving forward.”

    ‘Flickering back to life’

    Elyea’s experience is reflective of some of the data on film and TV productions in Los Angeles over the last year.

    On the LAist podcast Imperfect Paradise, entertainment journalist Dawn Chmielewski notes that Film LA, which tracks permitting for on-location shoots in and around Los Angeles, showed that when it comes to television production, there was a 51% increase in the second quarter over the first.

    “Overall, the numbers are still down year over year,” Chmielewski says. “But it's showing that the industry is sort of flickering back to life.”

    Another promising data point Chmielewski points out: ProdPro, which tracks productions around the world, “showed that both the number of films being shot and overall production spend are both up in California for the second quarter of this year.”

    But there are also statistics that point to a less rosy picture.

    Film LA research that shows the number of shoot days in Los Angeles has decreased by nearly 50 percent since 2017. And it’s estimated that since the peak of the streaming era in 2022, nearly 50 thousand production jobs have been lost in Los Angeles.

    ‘It feels incredibly uncertain’

    Costumer Andrea Wheeler describes the current climate in the industry as one where “everybody is on eggshells,” with so many people she knows who’ve had to pivot to other careers that “you feel like you’re in a dying industry right now.”

    A woman with long brown hair, wearing a blue and white winter hat and a maroon sweater and scarf, smiles while sitting at a table. Behind her is a bar that is out of focus.
    Andrea Wheeler is a costumer who has worked on TV shows like "Lopez v. Lopez" and movies like Marvel's "Eternals."
    (
    Courtesy of Andrea Wheeler
    )

    While Wheeler was recently able to find work on a show that moved from Vancouver to California because of the tax credit boost here, she says the pay and working conditions didn’t match up to the kind of work she was able to find in the past.

    From around 2016 to 2019, she says, “if you were in a job that was really atrocious, just like really bad working conditions. ... You could just leave and find another job the next day. There was a lot of security there, [but] not now.”

    A woman wearing a black t-shirt reading "Shondaland" sits in a director's chair and smiles at the camera. Next to her is an empty director's chair that reads "Netflix" and behind her is a softly lit red backdrop.
    Chineza Ezinkwo is a production coordinator based in Los Angeles. She most recently worked on "Tyrant," a Charlize Theron film that shot in LA.
    (
    Courtesy of Chineza Ezinkwo
    )

    Chineza Ezinkwo, a production coordinator who’s worked in the film and TV industry in Los Angeles since 2011, echoes Wheeler.

    “ Yes, there's more work happening, but also it's hard to find,” Ezinkwo says. “You can't really plan to build a life in the way that you felt like you used to even a few years ago.”

    Still, she says there is also a bit of a renewed sense of optimism in the industry right now.

    “It feels incredibly uncertain, but I will say there's more hope these past two years than there was certainly [in] the past three or four years.”

  • City is left as last major funder of LAHSA
    LAHSA-COMMISSION
    A presentation during a LAHSA Commission meeting on Friday, April 25, 2025.

    Topline:

    The city of L.A. is now left as the last remaining major funder of L.A.’s embattled homelessness agency — known as LAHSA — after the agency decided this week to give up management of federal dollars and L.A. County pulled its funding this summer.

    The backstory: The L.A City Council has debated withdrawing funds for years, but is still in the process of hiring a consultant to come up with a plan.

    Corruption charges: This week, federal prosecutors announced new fraud and bribery charges over homelessness funds that flowed through LAHSA. They allege a nonprofit founder siphoned $1 million in taxpayer funds into a high-end nightclub and a nearly $50,000 trip to Tahiti. It’s the latest fallout around LAHSA, which for years has seen outside audits and reviews find that it’s failed to adequately oversee taxpayer spending.

    What the mayoral candidates say: L.A. Mayor Karen Bass and her mayoral challenger, Councilmember Nithya Raman, both say they want the city to pull its funds and directly manage them. In recent weeks on the campaign trail, Raman has promised an exit within her first year as mayor if elected, while Bass this week said it would take “a couple of years.”

    This week, Los Angeles' embattled homelessness agency made a major shift when it decided to no longer conduct the region's annual homeless count and give up management of over $200 million in annual federal funds aimed at addressing homelessness starting next month.

    The day after the shift, federal prosecutors announced new fraud and bribery charges over homelessness funds that flowed through the agency. They allege a nonprofit founder siphoned $1 million in taxpayer funds into a high-end nightclub and a nearly $50,000 trip to Tahiti, among other claims. The founder's attorney has not responded to requests for comment.

    It’s the latest fallout around the L.A. Homeless Services Authority, known as LAHSA, which for years has seen outside audits and reviews find that it’s failed to adequately oversee taxpayer spending.

    In response to one of those audits, L.A. County decided a year and a half ago to pull its roughly $300 million per year from LAHSA — moving it into a newly created county homelessness department.

    Until this year, LAHSA was funded by three main sources: the county, the city and the federal government.

    With LAHSA’s decision this week to bow out of federal funding, the city of L.A. is now left as its last remaining major funder.

    The L.A City Council has debated withdrawing funds for years, but is still in the process of hiring a consultant to come up with a plan.

    L.A. Mayor Karen Bass and her mayoral challenger, Councilmember Nithya Raman, both say they want the city to pull its funds and manage them directly. In recent weeks on the campaign trail, Raman has promised an exit within her first year as mayor if elected, while Bass this week said it would take “a couple of years.”

    A woman with medium skin tone with short curly light brown hair wearing black-rimmed glasses and a black jacket with the seal of Los Angeles stands behind a podium speaking into a microphone.
    L.A. Mayor Karen Bass speaks at a press conference before LAHSA's annual homeless count on Tuesday, Feb. 18, 2025, in Los Angeles.
    (
    Carlin Stiehl
    /
    LAist
    )

    In June and July, Bass’ office said she took steps toward exiting LAHSA, saying she directed city housing staff to come up with a plan for the city to leave the agency. Those staff told LAist they’re not aware of any such directive, and Bass’ office has not responded to follow-up questions.

    No decisions yet from city

    Three years ago, as the L.A. City Council’s homelessness committee was expressing frustration at years of inaccurate and incomplete performance data from LAHSA, a council member said the council had failed to examine alternatives that could take over management of the funding from the agency.

    “ We have to have something in place. And I think what we failed as council is to start talking [through] the questions about what that would mean,” Councilmember John Lee said at the time.

    “ We need to make sure that we take a look at those options. Otherwise, every year, we're going to be coming here … having the same exact conversations.”

    How to reach me

    If you have a tip, you can reach me on Signal. My username is ngerda.47.

    The next year, county auditors found that LAHSA had failed to properly track and oversee the money it managed.

    The City Council then voted in March 2025 to study letting the city contract directly with homeless service providers, bypassing LAHSA.

    It was about a year before council members discussed next steps at a meeting.

    This April, the council's Housing and Homelessness Committee — chaired at the time by Raman — recommended shifting city-funded programs away from LAHSA over the course of the current fiscal year. They recommended a July 1 deadline for a plan to be provided. That date came and went without the full council directing that a plan be created.

    A person with light-brown skin tone and dark hair pulled back speaks at a podium into a microphone, wearing a mustard-colored turtleneck and gesturing with one hand. Behind them stand three people.
    City Councilmember Nithya Raman speaks ahead of the annual homeless count on Jan. 20, 2026.
    (
    Jordan Rynning
    /
    LAist
    )

    The full council approved money for a consultant on Aug. 4, when it voted to allocate $450,000 to "rapidly hire" outside experts to study a transition plan.

    That consultant hasn’t been hired yet. A competitive bidding process is underway, according to City Administrative Officer Matt Szabo.

    "We are required to solicit bids for that work and are currently in the procurement process," Szablo said via email.

    Mounting federal and legal pressure

    The city's deliberations are unfolding against escalating scrutiny of LAHSA itself.

    In June, the Trump administration suspended the agency from federal homelessness dollars, citing what it called a pattern of fraud, failure and flagrant mismanagement. Administration officials at the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, or HUD, pointed in part to the case of Abundant Blessings, a nonprofit whose director, Alex Soofer, was criminally charged in January with siphoning at least $10 million in homelessness funds that flowed through LAHSA.

    An LAist investigation found LAHSA had approved at least $3.5 million in contracts to Soofer's nonprofit even after its own compliance team flagged the group as high-risk for failing to do its job. Soofer recently agreed to plead guilty to diverting $2 million and previously repaid LAHSA $1.25 million.

    LAHSA sued to block the federal suspension of homelessness dollars, arguing HUD's evidence was thin and its process abrupt. In an August ruling, U.S. District Judge David Carter paused the suspension pending further hearings, writing that LAHSA "may be dysfunctional" but that federal officials had "abruptly" pulled funding from providers serving thousands of people.

    This week, LAHSA gave up trying to continue its federal responsibilities, just before prosecutors announced the new charges against LAHSA vendors.

    LAist reporter Aaron Schrank contributed reporting to this story.

  • How candidates say they would tackle homelessness
    Two women, one with light-brown skin tone and one with brown skin tone, speak into microphones side by side on a panel, both mid-gesture.
    L.A. Mayor Karen Bass and Councilmember Nithya Raman appear separately at a mayoral forum held Sept. 3, 2026, in downtown Los Angeles.

    Topline:

    Incumbent Karen Bass and challenger Nithya Raman laid out competing plans for fixing L.A.'s homelessness crisis at separate mayoral candidate forums this week ahead of the Nov. 3 election.

    Why it matters: More than 29,000 people sleep outside in the city, a nearly 8% jump from last year. The two candidates are both promising to solve L.A.'s homelessness crisis, but they have slightly different approaches. Voters decide between the two on Nov. 3.

    Breaking from LAHSA: Both candidates now support the city eventually leaving LAHSA, the joint city-county homelessness authority. Bass wants to move now, proposing an independent system within about two years. "The county filed for divorce. Now we file, too," Bass said.

    The Inside Safe fight: Bass's signature program, which moves people from encampments into motels, is the sharpest divide. Raman calls it too costly — and wants cheaper rental subsidies instead.

    More than 29,000 people sleep outside in L.A., according to official estimates — a nearly 8% increase over last year.

    Two candidates for mayor are promising to change that, but they have different ideas about how.

    Incumbent Mayor Karen Bass and Councilmember Nithya Raman appeared separately at homelessness forums hosted this week by Hope The Mission, a large homeless shelter operator.

    The events were held amid a national spotlight on L.A.’s homelessness crisis.

    This week, a congressional subcommittee held a hearing on allegations of fraud and mismanagement of homelessness funds — a hearing in which Bass declined to appear. The next day, federal authorities announced charges against three employees at L.A. homelessness nonprofits in a widening federal investigation of homeless services fraud.

    Bass cited L.A.’s homelessness crisis as the reason she sought the city’s top job in 2022.

    “I ran because I am always compelled to go toward a crisis,” she said Thursday.

    She has made clearing homeless encampments and moving people indoors a top priority as mayor, but fell far short of her pledge to end street homelessness by 2026.

    Raman has said founding a local homelessness nonprofit inspired her 2020 L.A. City Council run. For years, Raman was chair of the council committee focused on city homelessness policy.

    Both candidates have played major roles in shaping L.A.’s homelessness response in recent years, and they told forum moderators this week that the city’s approach has been dysfunctional.

    L.A.’s next mayor will face a barrage of challenges related to homelessness.

    Here’s how the candidates said they would handle some of the big ones:

    How will they deal with the Trump administration?

    The Trump administration has been cracking down on the L.A. region’s administration of homeless services to root out potential financial mismanagement, but also to challenge the local policy approach to homelessness and impose policies it prefers.

    Federal officials argue that approaches known as “housing first” and “harm reduction” are failing. They favor treatment and enforcement instead.

    Bass, a Democrat, skipped a House subcommittee hearing on federal homelessness spending Tuesday, dismissing it as politically motivated.

    “ I'm the mayor of the second-largest city in the country, and I don't have time for foolishness,” Bass said Thursday. “And remember, I know these people. It's a dog and pony show to see who's gonna get on Fox that night. I was not going to subject myself to that, and I was not going to subject our city to that.”

    Bass said her office is cooperating fully by supplying thousands of pages of documents.

    Raman said L.A. should be using the courts much more aggressively to challenge federal overreach and protect funding.

    “ We've done that less than I would've liked here in Los Angeles, but other cities have done that and actually kept their federal dollars in place despite the best efforts of the Trump administration.”

    She said the city also has to make sure that funding is spent effectively, arguing L.A. currently has no single person tracking every dollar coming in from the federal government, state government and other sources.

    “That is wrong,” Raman said at a forum on Wednesday. “If I am mayor — when I am mayor — I will ensure that every single dollar that is being given to us is being used to get as many people indoors into safety and to keep them there as effectively as possible.”

    What to do about LAHSA?

    Both candidates have said they support the city eventually breaking away from LAHSA, the joint city-county homelessness authority.

    "The county filed for divorce. Now we file, too," Bass said on Thursday.

    Last year, L.A. County officials voted to remove more than $300 million in annual homelessness funding from LAHSA’s control and to manage those funds itself with a new county department. Bass is now proposing the city create its own, independent “continuum of care,” a process she said could take “a couple of years.”

    Bass, who appointed herself to serve on LAHSA’s governing board before stepping down this month, said she’s learned in recent years “how profoundly dysfunctional” the regional homeless services system is.

    She argued that because L.A. represents 40% of the county's population and is the epicenter of the crisis, the city must have more control over the system.

    “You might remember that expression I started with: locked arms,” Bass said. “And we locked arms as long as we could.”

    Raman, in her mayoral platform, also called for the city to prepare to move hundreds of millions of dollars in homelessness contracts away from LAHSA, which she described as "plagued with scandal." But she said the city has to build the capacity to take on the job first.

    At Thursday's forum, Raman didn't mention LAHSA by name, instead describing coordination failures between agencies — citing permanent supportive housing units that sat empty for more than a year because departments weren't talking to each other.

    As chair of the council's Homelessness Committee, Raman said she created the city's Bureau of Homelessness Oversight to track spending and outcomes, but accused Bass of failing to staff it promptly.

    “The mayor did not hire people to staff up that oversight body quickly enough,” Raman said.

    LAHSA has served as the lead agency managing homelessness services for the region since 1993, including conducting a yearly homeless count, preparing regional applications for federal funds and managing key databases.

    This week, the agency announced it would soon forfeit those roles and allow other agencies or organizations to apply for them instead — including other county or city of L.A. agencies.

    What about encampments?

    The candidates are also somewhat split on their approach to homelessness encampments. Bass has criticized Raman for voting several times since 2022 against expanding the city’s anti-camping ordinance, which restricts camping in certain public spaces including schools and day cares.

    Raman has defended her votes. She argued the law, at best, “would have moved an encampment from one block to the next block.”

    “To me, that is not good enough," Raman said. "My imagination for how we address homelessness in L.A. goes beyond just thinking about which block an encampment should be on. It is about how we actually get encampments indoors."

    Asked about enforcement approaches, Bass pointed to physical barriers — like cement planters that replaced a major encampment on San Vicente Boulevard — as a more effective deterrent than ticketing or arrests.

    “ So sometimes using physical barriers work, but what we have not done is just gone in and arrested homeless people,” Bass said. “That has never happened.”

    The sharpest divide between the candidates centers on Bass’ signature program, Inside Safe, which moves people from encampments into motels and interim housing.

    Raman said she agreed with the underlying concept — going out to encampments and offering shelter — but that the program is too costly and hasn't evolved since Bass launched it in 2022.

    “Her program has not changed or learned or adapted from the lessons that they should have had in place, and to me, that is a major, major issue,” Raman said.

    Raman put the cost at roughly $100,000 per person, per year — "not a fiscally sustainable approach to a crisis that is growing in our city," she said — and favors time-limited subsidies, short-term rental vouchers that cost a third as much.

    Bass called that framing "fundamentally dishonest," arguing the county reimburses the city for some of the up-front cost.

    Bass said she wants to bring costs down by building permanent structures on public land instead of renting motel rooms.

    She said she favors moving groups of unhoused people together and bringing services to them, which she said is harder to do with the housing vouchers Raman wants to rely on.

    "I would house 30 people at a time, not one by one,” Bass said. "I see it from a people's point of view. She sees it from a numbers point of view. Both are needed."

    The general election is Nov. 3.