Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • Officials consider permanent protections
    A young male mountain lion gazing at the camera in the night walking through grass and rocks.
    The California Fish and Game Commission on Thursday called for permanent protections for the big cats in the Santa Monica Mountains, San Gabriel, San Bernardino Mountains and others.

    Topline:

    Southern California’s mountain lions could get permanent protections from state wildlife officials.

    What happened: The California Fish and Game Commission on Thursday called for permanent protections for the big cats in the Santa Monica Mountains, San Gabriel, San Bernardino Mountains and other areas. The protections are warranted under the state’s Endangered Species Act, according to the commission.

    How were SoCal’s big cats involved: The Center and Mountain Lion Foundation petitioned the commission to protect six mountain lion populations in Southern California and on the Central Coast. In 2020, the commission unanimously granted temporary protections to those populations while the Department of Fish and Wildlife considered permanent ones.

    Why it matters: Mountain lions are doing fine in some parts of the state, but here in Southern California, they’re struggling due to development and urban sprawl.

    What are the protections? The California Endangered Species Act makes it illegal for any person or agency to import, export, take, possess, or purchase a listed species. On top of that, Proposition 117 makes it illegal to take, injure, possess, transport, import, or sell a mountain lion.

    What else is being done to help: In Agoura Hills, the Wallis Annenberg Wildlife Crossing is in its final construction stage to help pumas, bobcats, deer, bats, birds and other animals — big and small — cross over the 101 Freeway. The project is on track to be finished by the end of next year.

    What’s next: The California Fish and Game Commission is expected to make a final decision on during a two-day meeting on Feb. 11 and 12.

    Go deeper… on L.A.'s famed wildlife, listen to Imperfect Paradise: Lions, Coyotes & Bears.

    Listen 50:06
    Lions, Coyotes, & Bears: Part 1 - The Mountain Lion Celebrity

  • Huntington Park OK’s eviction pause for late rent
    A white passage way with arcs and stucco roof. In the foreground a grassy patch and a white sign that reads "Civic Center City of Huntington Park."
    The Huntington Park Civic Center.

    Topline:

    The Huntington Park City Council voted unanimously on Tuesday to pass a new eviction protection for tenants who’ve fallen short on their monthly rent.

    The details: Under the new rules, the city will protect tenants from eviction if they’ve failed to pay up to one month’s worth of rent. Advocates say giving renters more time to get caught up is crucial to avoid unnecessary evictions and potential homelessness, especially with families in the 97% Latino city losing breadwinners and having to stay home from work due to ICE raids.

    The opposition: Landlord groups have said the rules could push rental housing owners to engage in tougher screening of new tenants, potentially making it harder for low-income renters to find housing.

    The spread: The city of L.A. was the first to pass a similar protection in 2025. Earlier this year, Huntington’s Park’s neighbor city, Cudahy, passed its own version.

  • Sponsored message
  • Report recommends more oversight at Cal State
    Two femme presenting students walk down university stairs outside. There are trees and greenery
    The Cal State Long Beach campus.

    Topline:

    If state lawmakers decide to continue funding California State University’s efforts to improve graduation rates, they should tighten oversight of how those dollars are spent, California’s nonpartisan fiscal and policy adviser said Wednesday.

    Mixed success: The Legislative Analyst’s Office (LAO) reported that while CSU’s Graduation Initiative 2025 had mixed success at the end of its 10-year run, a lack of detailed financial reports clouds lawmakers’ ability to assess which interventions were most cost-effective. As CSU works to implement new and more wide-ranging criteria for student progress, the analyst’s office calls for lawmakers to more closely track future spending across the 22-campus system.

    Why it matters: LAO found that CSU campuses struggled to balance multiple graduation objectives. Cal State also has not provided enough data to the state about how much campuses spent on specific activities like tutoring, academic advising and mentoring, LAO noted. Data on students’ use of those services also wasn’t available for Graduation Initiative 2025, though recent CSU survey results suggest use of counseling and career services is relatively low.

    If state lawmakers decide to continue funding California State University’s efforts to improve graduation rates, they should tighten oversight of how those dollars are spent, California’s nonpartisan fiscal and policy adviser said Wednesday.

    The Legislative Analyst’s Office (LAO) reported that while CSU’s Graduation Initiative 2025 had mixed success at the end of its 10-year run, a lack of detailed financial reports clouds lawmakers’ ability to assess which interventions were most cost-effective. As CSU works to implement new and more wide-ranging criteria for student progress, the analyst’s office calls for lawmakers to more closely track future spending across the 22-campus system.

    LAO recommends state lawmakers “continue to monitor whether existing programs are meeting their objectives cost‑effectively and make adjustments accordingly. While a new CSU graduation initiative likely would provide some state benefits (such as enhanced economic mobility), those benefits could be less sizable or less significant than the potential public benefits of other state programs.”

    Funding for the graduation initiative grew from roughly $50 million in 2016-17 to more than $400 million annually by 2024-25, an LAO analysis found, backed by state and tuition revenue. Systemwide, Cal State had more success in increasing two-year graduation rates for transfer students and four-year rates for freshmen, but saw slower progress on six-year freshmen and four-year transfer rates. Achievement varied widely among campuses.

    LAO’s interviews with campus administrators suggested the graduation effort had several positive effects beyond raising completion rates, including better Cal State data systems and heightened public scrutiny that held campuses accountable for students’ success.

    But LAO found that CSU campuses struggled to balance multiple graduation objectives. Cal State also has not provided enough data to the state about how much campuses spent on specific activities like tutoring, academic advising and mentoring, LAO noted. Data on students’ use of those services also wasn’t available for Graduation Initiative 2025, though recent CSU survey results suggest use of counseling and career services is relatively low.

    CSU is now launching a new and broader framework for measuring student achievement, which includes not only graduation rates, but metrics like placement into jobs or graduate school and post-graduation earnings.

    If lawmakers opt to back those goals, LAO recommends they explicitly link funding to a single objective and set a formula for how the money is divided among CSU campuses. LAO also calls for campuses to release consistent annual tables breaking down spending and student utilization rates.

    EdSource is an independent nonprofit organization that provides analysis on key education issues facing California and the nation. LAist republishes articles from EdSource with permission.

  • Companies announce $1 billion licensing agreement

    Topline:

    The Walt Disney Company has reached a licensing agreement with OpenAI that brings Disney characters and images to Sora, the artificial intelligence company's short-form-video generator.

    About the deal: According to a joint statement released by the two companies, the three-year licensing agreement will allow people to create and share videos using "more than 200" animated characters from Disney, Marvel, Pixar and Star Wars. As a part of this agreement, Disney will invest $1 billion into OpenAI and become a "major customer" of the company.

    Concerns over the deal: Fairplay, the nonprofit advocacy group dedicated to reducing children's screen time, issued a statement saying the Disney OpenAI agreement "betrays kids." "OpenAI claims children are prohibited from using Sora, yet here they are luring young kids to their platform using some of their favorite characters. Shame on the 'House of Mouse' for aiding and abetting OpenAI's efforts to addict young children to its unsafe platform and products," the statement reads.

    If you've ever wanted to conjure up a scenario between yourself, Han Solo and the crew from Zootopia, you're in luck.

    The Walt Disney Company has reached a licensing agreement with OpenAI that brings Disney characters and images to Sora, the artificial intelligence company's short-form-video generator. According to a joint statement released by the two companies, the three-year licensing agreement will allow people to create and share videos using "more than 200" animated characters from Disney, Marvel, Pixar and Star Wars.

    Notably, the statement adds "the agreement does not include any talent likeness or voices."

    As a part of this agreement, Disney will invest $1 billion into OpenAI and become a "major customer" of the company.

    Fairplay, the nonprofit advocacy group dedicated to reducing children's screen time, issued a statement saying the Disney OpenAI agreement "betrays kids."

    "OpenAI claims children are prohibited from using Sora, yet here they are luring young kids to their platform using some of their favorite characters. Shame on the 'House of Mouse' for aiding and abetting OpenAI's efforts to addict young children to its unsafe platform and products," the statement reads.

    Disney and OpenAI say in their statement that the two companies share a commitment to protecting the rights of creators while "maintaining robust controls to prevent the generation of illegal or harmful content."

    Sora users will be able to take advantage of the agreement starting in 2026.
    Copyright 2025 NPR

  • Trump calls affordability crisis a 'hoax.' Is it?

    Topline:

    President Donald Trump's messaging about a strong economy is at odds with widespread voter sentiment that he's not doing enough to tackle rising costs.

    Reality check: While the prices of some items such as gasoline have fallen on Trump's watch, the overall cost of living has continued to climb. For example, grocery costs are up 2.7% for the year ending in September and electricity costs have jumped more than 5%, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

    Why it matters: Many voters are questioning how well Trump is tackling the stubbornly high costs of everyday items. Some 57% of voters said in a Harvard CAPS/Harris poll released this week that Trump was "losing the battle against inflation," while 68% of respondents to a AP-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research poll from October said the economy was poor or very poor.

    In the spring of last year, then-President Joe Biden tried to convince skeptical voters that the struggling economy was healthy. Then-candidate Donald Trump seized on the moment and vowed to lower prices for American consumers, beating his eventual Democratic rival Kamala Harris in part with a winning economic message.

    Now it's President Trump who's trying to persuade the public that the state of the economy is sound, after prices rose 3% in the 12 months ending in September and with consumers spending less on big-ticket items.

    Betsey Stevenson, a professor of economics at the University of Michigan, says making that argument could be a tall order in the face of rising costs for a number of goods and services.

    "My personal takeaway from the experience we had [in 2024] was that you can't tell people that prices aren't up when they're up," she said.

    While the prices of some items such as gasoline have fallen on Trump's watch, the overall cost of living has continued to climb. For example, grocery costs are up 2.7% for the year ending in September and electricity costs have jumped more than 5%, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

    "Trump's claims about inflation are false," Stevenson said, "and you can go to the grocery store and see it yourself."

    But, in a wide-ranging speech to supporters on Tuesday, Trump both defended his administration's track record on the economy and said that talk of affordability was overblown. Trump told the crowd in Mount Pocono, Pa., that he believed the term "affordability" was a "hoax" perpetrated by Democrats. Trump's recent assertions dismissing inflation are not backed by official government economic data.

    Consumers are feeling high prices firsthand

    While it's true that inflation hit a 9% high during the summer of 2022 under the Biden administration, that was during the pandemic and it dropped significantly after that. Inflation dipped to an annual rate of 3% in January during Biden's final month in office, the same rate it was in September under Trump.

    Now many voters are questioning how well Trump is tackling the stubbornly high costs of everyday items. Some 57% of voters said in a Harvard CAPS/Harris poll released this week that Trump was "losing the battle against inflation," while 68% of respondents to a AP-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research poll from October said the economy was poor or very poor.

    Voters' souring attitudes on the Trump administration's handling of the economy come less than a year before the U.S. midterm elections, in which Republicans will aim to maintain their majorities in both houses of Congress. But in a warning sign for the GOP, November's odd-year races saw Democrats who campaigned on affordability win major contests in New York City, Virginia and New Jersey.

    Political consultant and pollster Frank Luntz says Trump risks appearing out of touch if he continues to claim that affordability is a "hoax" when Americans feel like they're paying more — and actually do pay more.

    "When you talk about affordability, it is all perception," Luntz told NPR's Morning Edition. "The greatest danger is if you tell people happy days are here again, and it's 1929," he added, referencing the beginning of the Great Depression.

    Luntz added that Trump blaming Biden for the failures of the economy may have worked during the campaign season and even for some time after.

    "That said, it's now a year since the election, and the public does expect this administration to take charge. At a certain point, they will not accept the blame game," he said.

    Trump's tariffs are contributing to inflation

    But getting inflation to slow down or prices to drop will be easier said than done for the Trump administration, which has embraced economic policies such as tariffs that force prices upward, according to Stevenson. Trump and other administration officials have argued that tariffs are necessary to correct past global trade policies that have been unfair to the U.S. and to bring back domestic manufacturing.

    Although tariffs are raising about $30 billion per month in revenue for U.S. coffers, the new import taxes levied by the Trump administration have increased prices on a number of items, from food to clothing to furniture.

    "What I find surprising is that he's out there telling people: 'This isn't happening. This is a con job. There's no affordability problem,'" Stevenson said. "At the same time, he's pursuing policies that are purposefully restricting supply, which every person who has taken even an introductory economics course knows will push up prices."

    Still, the administration has taken several steps recently to ease the negative effects of tariffs on U.S. consumers and producers. Last month, Trump scrapped the tariffs on certain products that aren't widely produced in the U.S., such as bananas and coffee. And on Monday the administration announced that it was making $12 billion in one-time payments to U.S. farmers to offset their rising business costs.
    Copyright 2025 NPR