Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • Christmas classics, Broadway shows and more
    Four actors in shimmery flapper and showgirl drag perform on stage in a production of "La Cage Aux Folles."

    Topline:

    Whether you love holiday favorites like "A Christmas Carol," want to see big Broadway productions like "Wicked" and "La Cage Aux Folles," or explore lesser-known shows with the family, theater coming to Southern California in December has something for everyone.

    Highlights:

    • Christmas fun — Debbie Allen Dance is putting on Hot Chocolate Nutcracker in Redondo Beach, A Noise Within is doing A Christmas Carol, the L.A. Ballet also has The Nutcracker on and the American Ballet Theatre will visit Segerstrom with their version of the Tchaikovsky holiday classic as well.
    • The Lythgoe Family's Panto franchise — England has the ubiquitous tradition of going to see a pantomime. The Lythgoe family's production bring two of those types of shows to L.A. this year: Peter Pan & Tinkerbell in Thousand Oaks and Rapunzel's Holiday Wish in Laguna.
    • Broadway darlings — Still want more Wicked? The musical comes to the Pantages starting Dec. 4! And if you want to check out the hottest drag club in town, La Cage Aux Folles hits the Pasadena Playhouse on Dec. 15.

    There’s a lot of fan service out there for theater buffs this December, whether it’s heading to the movies for a sing-a-long of Wicked (I mean, come on, if you’re a Broadway person you’ve already seen it once at least, or will have by the end of Thanksgiving weekend), booking your tickets to Once Upon A Mattress with the incredible Sutton Foster at the Ahmanson, or seeking out some of the hidden gems in the local theater scene — and I promise this holiday season, those are plentiful.

    We’ve put together a short list of some of the best things to take your friends, family, or just yourself to in the coming weeks.

    Some people say L.A. isn’t a theater town, but I beg to differ! A ticket to any of these shows would make a great holiday or December birthday gift and you’ll support the arts at the same time.

    It’s All Your Fault, Tyler Price 

    Last weekend, I had the pleasure of seeing one of those gems, It’s All Your Fault, Tyler Price, at the Hudson Backstage Theater in Hollywood. The musical is ambitious and punches well above its black box theater weight, telling the story of a family whose daughter Lucy has epilepsy. The family’s struggles are seen through the eyes of their middle school-aged son, Jackson, who stages a musical following a bullying incident at school.

    Reminiscent of recent hits like Dear Evan Hansen and Next to Normal, Tyler Price has serious Broadway power behind it in the form of director and co-writer Kristin Hanggi (Rock of Ages). Catch it before it wraps on Dec. 15.

    Cat Kid Comic Club: The Musical

    Brian Owen and Sonia Roman on stage and in costume in the show "Cat Kid Comic Club: The Musical."
    (
    Jeremy Daniel
    )

    If you have a 7- to 10-year-old in your life, you’re probably only too familiar with the phenomenon that is Cat Kid Comic Club (and its erstwhile companion, Dog Man). After the success of last season’s Dog Man: The Musical at the Kirk Douglas Theatre in Culver City, the TheaterWorksUSA crew is back with Cat Kid Comic Club: The Musical, which teaches kids about imagination and creativity through Dav Pilkey’s popular characters. I took my favorite 10-year-old who is a fan of the books, and he gave it a glowing review but thought kids younger than him would like it even more. It’s on until Jan. 5.

    Once Upon a Mattress

    Michael Urie and Sutton Foster hold hands and stand center stage with an ensemble dancing behind them during a performance of "Once Upon a Mattress."
    (
    Joan Marcus
    )

    It’s not every day that we get the original Broadway cast members in L.A. for a touring production. This December, we get a double bill for the revival of Once Upon a Mattress, with Sutton Foster (Anything Goes, The Music Man) and Michael Urie (whom I last saw in Buyer and Cellar at the Taper back in 2014) on stage for the better part of a month in Once Upon a Mattress. The fun retelling of The Princess and the Pea was praised during its NYC run, particularly the “zany” energy between Foster and Urie, says the NY Times. It plays at the Ahmanson Dec. 10 through Jan. 5.

    Back to the Future: The Musical

    Doc and Marty McFly stand on either side of the DeLorean in "Back to the Future: The Musical."
    (
    Matthew Murphy, Evan Zimmerman
    )

    Great Scott! Perfect for kids and '80s-nostalgic adults alike, the Broadway tour of Back to the Future: The Musical is playing at the Pantages through Dec. 1 and then heads south to Segerstrom Center for the Arts in Costa Mesa from Dec. 26 through Jan. 5.

    I saw the show in London last fall and while it sticks mostly to the film’s story (and avid fans will definitely sit there and point out all the overlaps and differences for you), it thrives on its breaks from the movie with some truly out-there numbers that had me dancing in my seat. And I won’t spoil it, but the special effects rival a ride at Universal Studios.

    La Cage Aux Folles

    Cheyenne Jackson and Kevin Cahoon sit on a checkered couch, singing to each other on stage during a performance of "La Cage Aux Folles."
    (
    Jeff Lorch
    )

    The hottest drag club in town is the Pasadena Playhouse — at least until the delightful production of Jerry Herman and Harvey Fierstein’s modern classic La Cage Aux Folles closes on Dec. 15. Starring Cheyenne Jackson (Call Me Kat, American Horror Story: Apocalypse) and Kevin Cahoon (Shucked!), this show is the serotonin hit we all need this fall.

    New Works Festival

    One of my favorite theater events of the year is the New Works Fest at IAMA Theatre Company in Atwater Village, running from Dec. 5-15. Showcasing new plays by local talent, this year’s crop features readings of several new plays including Hit Machine (or True Wes) by IAMA favorite Jonathan Caren and Chloe Hung’s Care Less.

    Fiddler on the Roof

    Jason Alexander and another actor sit on stage in costume, performing the musical "Fiddler on the Roof." Alexander is toasting and smiling.
    (
    Jason Niedle
    /
    TETHOS
    )

    And get in while you can — Jason Alexander (Seinfeld, The Producers) takes his last bow as Teyve in Fiddler on the Roof at La Mirada on Dec. 1. Taking on the role originated by Zero Mostel on Broadway, Alexander steps in as the village elder, seeing his Jewish family through hardship, change, and love in rural Anatevka. Fun fact: Fiddler was the first musical I ever saw (I was 7), so let’s say it’s good for all ages!

    Waiting for Godot

    Just the mention of Waiting for Godot can elicit a strong reaction. People either remember reading the tragicomic Beckett play in school fondly and appreciate its long-lasting cultural relevance or they groan at the memory of making it through, finding it tedious. While a challenging play for sure, this production at the Geffen in Westwood has been getting great reviews and stars Aasaf Mandvi (Ghosts) and Rainn Wilson (The Office) as Estragon and Vladimir through Dec. 21.

    Wicked

    If you haven’t gotten your fill of Wicked at the movies, the Broadway version is coming to the Pantages starting Dec. 4. Go see it and be that person comparing every scene and difference from the stage to film.

    The Lythgoe Family's Panto franchise

    One of my favorite things about holiday time in England is the ubiquitous tradition of going to see a pantomime. Every neighborhood puts on their own version of a twisted fairy tale, with tropes that have withstood the test of time. Here in L.A., we have one of our very own each year — and this year, two! — produced by Lythgoe Family Panto. Peter Pan & Tinkerbell is on at the Scherr Forum Theater in Thousand Oaks from Dec. 13 to Dec. 29, and Rapunzel’s Holiday Wish stars Sally Struthers at Laguna Playhouse Dec. 7 through 29.

    Pacific Overtures

    Gedde Watanabe and Jon Jon Briones in costume for the show "Pacific Overtures."
    (
    Teolindo
    )

    East West Players just extended the run of their latest, Pacific Overtures, through Dec. 8, so you have a few more chances to catch the Sondheim musical at the Asian-American theater company’s home stage in Little Tokyo. The vintage 1976 show may not be Sondheim’s most well-known, but the musical, about Japan's westernization following a period of isolationism, was the first to play at East West Players back in 1979. This iteration features well-reviewed performances from West End vet Jon Jon Briones (The Reciter) and Gedde Watanabe.

    Kooza

    A woman aerial danced dressed in a red body and holding onto a long red, flowing ribbon performs in Cirque Du Soleil's show "Kooza."
    (
    Cirque Du Soleil
    )

    Cirque du Soleil is always a crowd-pleaser. The Canadian acrobats’ latest, Kooza, is on here under the big top at the Santa Monica Pier through Jan. 5.

    BATSU

    The Bourbon Room is curated exquisitely. If there’s a quirky show promoted there, I will always try to see it, and this December is no exception. BATSU is a Japanese game show- slash-theater-slash-improv event that will make its L.A. debut with five performances at the Hollywood venue next month. Playbill videographer Ethan Treiman called the experience, which premiered at Edinburgh Fringe “maybe my favorite thing I’ve ever seen.” Count me in.

    Christmas and beyond

    For more traditional holiday fare on stage, there’s a wealth of Christmas delights, from the sublime to the silly. Debbie Allen Dance is putting on Hot Chocolate Nutcracker in Redondo Beach, A Noise Within is doing A Christmas Carol, the L.A. Ballet also has the Nutcracker on and the American Ballet Theatre will visit Segerstrom with their version of the Tchaikovsky holiday classic as well. If you haven’t had enough of Clara and the Mouse King, Bob Baker’s Marionette Theatre is putting on a charming show at Sierra Madre Playhouse. On the comedy side, Bob’s Holiday Office Party is at the Odyssey and the musical White Christmas is in Simi Valley. Plus, don’t miss the annual L.A. County Holiday Celebration with a wide range of free performances at the Music Center on Christmas Eve.

    And as we head into the new year, the theater scene only gets better. Keep an eye out for the new Larissa Fasthorse play Fake it Till You Make It at the Taper, Harry Potter and the Cursed Child at the Pantages, and Sondheim’s final show Old Friends premiering in a pre-Broadway run at the Ahmanson with Broadway superstars Bernadette Peters and Lea Salonga.

    Sign up for the Best Things To Do newsletter to get your twice-weekly dose of events in L.A.

  • 5 tech giants sued to stop new models
    Two people appear in silhouette in front of a white wall displaying the OpenAI wordmark and a black circle logo with two caret-shaped eyes and a “<3” beside it.
    Attendees gather at the OpenAI DevDay 2026 conference, Tuesday, Sept. 29, 2026, in San Francisco

    Topline:

    A coalition of online safety and consumer advocacy groups on Thursday sued five of the world’s leading artificial intelligence companies to halt further development, alleging the tech giants can’t prevent their own creations from causing “catastrophic” harm.

    Why it matters: The lawsuit in San Francisco Superior Court follows a midterm election that could bring a moment of reckoning for the fast-moving AI industry, as Democrats who won back control of Congress stress the need to regulate the technology. The filing, first reported on by The Associated Press, asks a judge to stop Anthropic, Google, Meta, OpenAI and SpaceXSI from developing or deploying new AI models, pointing to documented examples of cyberattacks and other harmful actions by AI systems and the companies’ own alarming acknowledgments that their technology has the potential to someday destroy humanity.

    The argument: The plaintiffs, all nonprofits, allege that the companies named in the lawsuit have violated a California unfair competition law by endangering public health and interfering with the use of property such as computer systems. They claim they’ve had to divert resources away from other planned work to address the acute harms threatened by each of the companies’ advancing AI models.

    The backstory: The AI industry has generated excitement and stock market gains, but also deep fears that the technology could go rogue and escape human control. Recent incidents of AI agents hacking government websites and companies — including when OpenAI’s ChatGPT hacked into another AI company on its own in July — have accelerated those concerns.

    A coalition of online safety and consumer advocacy groups on Thursday sued five of the world’s leading artificial intelligence companies to halt further development, alleging the tech giants can’t prevent their own creations from causing “catastrophic” harm.

    The lawsuit in San Francisco Superior Court follows a midterm election that could bring a moment of reckoning for the fast-moving AI industry, as Democrats who won back control of Congress stress the need to regulate the technology.

    The filing, first reported on by The Associated Press, asks a judge to stop Anthropic, Google, Meta, OpenAI and SpaceXSI from developing or deploying new AI models, pointing to documented examples of cyberattacks and other harmful actions by AI systems and the companies’ own alarming acknowledgments that their technology has the potential to someday destroy humanity.

    “No other industry is allowed to treat its own development of unsafe products — much less ones that could kill us all — as inevitable,” reads the complaint from the Irreplaceable Education Fund, Public Citizen, Heat Initiative and the Alliance for Secure AI. “Plaintiffs bring this suit to stop Defendants from continuing their unlawful path to disaster.”

    The AI industry has generated excitement and stock market gains, but also deep fears that the technology could go rogue and escape human control. Recent incidents of AI agents hacking government websites and companies — including when OpenAI’s ChatGPT hacked into another AI company on its own in July — have accelerated those concerns.

    President Donald Trump, a proponent of rapid AI development to keep the U.S. ahead of foreign competitors like China, has so far encouraged the companies to police themselves on matters of safety, though he has expressed openness to more guardrails. Congress also has stopped short of regulating the technology, but that may change with its Democratic takeover.

    Some CEOs of major AI companies, meanwhile, have voiced support for slowing development of the technology to give safety measures a chance to catch up. They also haven’t held back in recognizing the risks. Anthropic’s Dario Amodei, for example, last year said he thinks there’s a 1 in 4 chance AI’s future goes “really, really badly,” compared with a 3 in 4 chance it goes well. Elon Musk, the CEO of SpaceX, told Fox News in 2023 that AI could lead to “civilization destruction.”

    The plaintiffs, all nonprofits, allege that the companies named in the lawsuit have violated a California unfair competition law by endangering public health and interfering with the use of property such as computer systems. They claim they’ve had to divert resources away from other planned work to address the acute harms threatened by each of the companies’ advancing AI models.

    They also warn that the companies’ goals of creating AI systems that are broadly as smart as humans and can increasingly manage tasks and learn things autonomously could result in a permanent loss of control of the technology and heighten existential risks to humanity.

    The companies named in Thursday’s lawsuit didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment.

  • Sponsored message
  • Palisades Fire survivors share their stories
    A collage of two photos side by side, showing one photo of workers at the foundation of a destroyed home and another photo of a group of people smiling for a selfie.
    Palisades Fire survivors are sharing their stories and photos of what it means to find community.

    Topline:

    LAist spoke with a couple of Palisades Fire survivors about the experience of finding a community after the disaster. It meant the world to them.

    Why it matters: The diaspora from the Eaton and Palisades fires is far and wide.

    How to share your story: Earlier this year, LAist asked fire survivors what it looks and feels like to rebuild your life after 2025 L.A. Fires. We want to hear from homeowners, current or former renters, business owners and more.

    Read on… to share your story with LAist.

    What does it mean to rebuild your life, friendships and community after a disaster?

    For Palisades Fire survivors, it means everything.

    Many people had to leave their neighborhoods, where 6,837 structures were destroyed, while they work to rebuild their homes.

    They’ve also had to work at forging new friendships and connections.

    Friends in unexpected places

    A group of people wearing yellow safety vests gather near a foundation where a charred chimney and trees still stand where a home stood before.
    Workers gather near the foundation where the Zetlin home stood after it was destroyed in the Palisades Fire.
    (
    Barry Zetlin
    )

    Who is considered a friend?

    For Barry Zetlin, it’s not only the people he’s known his whole life or who were his neighbors. It’s also the people who have helped him and his wife, Andrea Zetlin, after the Palisades Fire.

    “They are my architects, my contractor,” he said. “Maybe I spent an hour with them a week, a couple of hours a month. Yet, when I'm with them, they feel like friends because we're working together and we feel for each other.”

    The Zetlins had been living in Playa Vista as they rebuilt their home in the Palisades. By the end of October, Zetlin and his wife are one step closer to moving in. Their new home is surrounded by empty lots and homes under construction. They will be the first house on their block to be completed.

    The avid readers and book collectors are excited to return to the area and move into their new home with custom bookshelves.

    Zetlin shared with LAist a short story he wrote in a writing group with other fire survivors about what new friends meant to him as they were rebuilding their home.

    Zetlin’s short story: “New Friendships”

    There have been so many new friendships, mainly short lived friend acquaintances who have filled my life. The people who volunteered to sift my house, friends for a few hours, helping strangers from just the goodness of their hearts. My architects, friends on and off for an hour at a time, to talk to and plan a rebuild and tell stories to. My neighbors down the street that we knew casually, now we talk several times a week with advice and questions. The people who helped get us assistance of one kind or another — maybe not friends, but new people who went out of their way to help us rebuild our world. A new friend from a trip we took, always available to talk or meet up and bring fun and distraction from the realities of our new life. These are my new friends — much appreciated in our dissociated world.

    Share your story

    With the second anniversary of the L.A. fires approaching, we still want to hear from survivors because we know everyone who was affected has a story to tell. So: What does it look and feel like rebuilding your life after the disaster?

    Some of you have shared how you felt a deep connection with gardens or trees that survived on your lots. We’ve heard from current and former renters who want to return home.

    Share your story and photos using the form below, and we may include them in an upcoming article. (We won’t publish anything you share without your permission.)

    Building a community

    Kathy Katims and her family lived in the Pacific Palisades for about three decades, most recently in a blufftop house they bought in 2023.

    After the fire destroyed the house and displaced the Katimses and their neighbors, the community's dispersal was the hardest thing for Kathy Katims. Longtime friends moved to other parts of Southern California or out of state. The Katimses have moved a couple of times too.

    Today they’re living in Venice while the home on the bluff is rebuilt.

    They’re also rebuilding community.

    “A lot of our community is not here,” said Katims, who invited neighbors over for a game night. “We wanted to really reach out and try to make some community.”

    A group of people smile for a selfie as they stand on a tennis court.
    Kathy Katims, bottom left, joined a group of neighbors in Venice to play Paddle Tennis.
    (
    Kathy Katims
    )

    She also found a community playing paddle tennis. That experience was a relief from the rebuilding process, which many survivors say feels like a second job.

    “I was focused on the ball and movement, and I let go of a lot of things like worrying,” she said.

    Katims also runs writing groups through Saved By a Story, including groups specifically for fire survivors, where Barry Zetlin is also a participant.

    She has a word of advice for fire survivors that has brought her joy.

    “Be bold,” she said.

    Looking for community?

    Youth services librarian Tommy Vinh Bui at the Lloyd Taber-Marina del Rey Library saw families affected by last year’s fires look to the library for resources and community. The branch still offers soil testing, disaster preparedness information and story times for kids.

    The Palisades Library also has a temporary branch in its parking lot Tuesday through Saturday, 1 to 5 p.m.

    A collaboration led by L.A. County Library is focused on documenting the lived experiences, cultural heritage and collective memory of communities affected by the 2025 Eaton and Palisades fires.

  • Attorney questions jailhouse informant
    A Long Beach Police squad car is seen in this 2014 file photo.

    Topline:

    The attorney who uncovered the Orange County jailhouse informant scandal is arguing in new court filings that an internal affairs investigation into the Long Beach Police Department shows “shocking deficiencies” with the oversight of paid civilian jailhouse informants in Los Angeles County that could implicate hundreds of criminal cases.

    The investigation: The Long Beach Police's 2016 internal investigation found a veteran homicide detective allowed a civilian jailhouse informant to remove his GPS tracking ankle monitor, in violation of a court order, during the Christmas holiday and then lied about it to authorities. The investigation substantiated several counts of misconduct against the detective, including one violation of state penal code for violating a court order. The detective, Hugo Cortes, retired before discipline was finalized, but the department found his conduct so egregious it recommended he be terminated. Cortes and the informant told investigators there were no established guidelines for the oversight and supervision of civilian jailhouse informants.

    What it means: The investigation exposed “shocking deficiencies” with the oversight of paid civilian jailhouse informants operating throughout Los Angeles County, defense attorney Scott Sanders wrote in his latest court filing. Rather than fully investigate the scope of these problems, Sanders argues the Los Angeles District Attorney’s Office and Long Beach Police Department limited their investigation to the narrow misconduct of a single officer and informant and downplayed the findings to avoid compromising prosecutions.

    Why it matters: The Orange County jailhouse informant scandal Sanders exposed eventually led to a Department of Justice investigation, and more than 60 cases were compromised as a result of the informant evidence. It’s unclear how many cases could be affected in Los Angeles County.

    Go deeper: Defense attorney: Long Beach police can’t be trusted to share evidence that could clear defendants

    The attorney who uncovered the Orange County jailhouse informant scandal is arguing in new court filings that an investigation into the Long Beach Police Department shows “shocking deficiencies” with the oversight of paid civilian jailhouse informants that could implicate hundreds of criminal cases in Los Angeles County.

    The internal investigation found a veteran homicide detective allowed a civilian jailhouse informant to remove his GPS tracking ankle monitor, in violation of a court order, during the 2015 Christmas holiday and then lied about it to authorities. According to internal investigators, that raised questions about why he was allowed to remove the monitor. And defense attorney Scott Sanders says the decision to not follow through with a wider inquiry casts doubt on the informant system as a whole.

    Sanders would know; he’s the attorney who uncovered the Orange County jailhouse informant scandal in 2014. A subsequent Department of Justice investigation into the practice found the Orange County District Attorney’s Office and Sheriff’s Department violated the 14th Amendment by not disclosing information that could have benefited criminal defendants.

    If that’s the case in L.A. County, it’s unclear how many criminal cases could be affected. In Orange County, more than 60 cases were compromised as a result of the informant evidence.

    Sanders has argued in previous court motions that the Long Beach Police Department hid information about an officer who arrested his client, Lonnie Jacobs, and, in doing so, violated his rights to a fair trial established by the 1963 Supreme Court case Brady v. Maryland.

    In a Nov. 10 filing supporting his motion to dismiss the drug charges against Jacobs, Sanders argues the internal investigation further demonstrates that the Long Beach Police Department cannot be trusted to turn over damaging information about its officers.

    The investigation exposed “shocking deficiencies” with the oversight of paid civilian jailhouse informants operating throughout Los Angeles County, “including the absence of standardized operational guidelines, inadequate coordination and recordkeeping among participating law enforcement agencies, and insufficient supervision of informants,” Sanders wrote.

    Rather than fully investigate the scope of these problems, Sanders argues the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office and Long Beach Police Department limited their investigation to the narrow misconduct of a single officer and informant and downplayed the findings to avoid compromising prosecutions.

    The Long Beach Police Department did not respond to emailed questions from LAist in time for publication. And the L.A. County District Attorney’s Office did not respond to a request for comment before publication.

    A concrete sign reads "Long Beach Police North Station" in front of a building with a peaked roof overhang and U.S. flag on a tall pole.
    The Long Beach Police North Station in March 2025.
    (
    Megan Garvey
    /
    LAist
    )

    What are Perkins agents?

    The use of what’s known as Perkins informants has faced growing questions in California recently. The U.S. Supreme Court determined in the 1990 case Illinois v. Perkins that undercover law enforcement officers don’t need to give Miranda warnings to incarcerated suspects before questioning them in a jail cell. Perkins operations can also use civilians working for law enforcement, as was the case in Long Beach.

    Some judges and defense attorneys call the practice coercive — citing threats and other tactics — and say it could be used to solicit inaccurate information. They also criticize the practice for disproportionately targeting Black and Latino defendants.

    Earlier this year, the California 4th District Court of Appeal overturned a conviction after finding a Perkins informant violated the defendant’s rights by essentially staging a surreptitious, coercive interrogation after he had asked for an attorney.

    Several counts of misconduct were filed by the Long Beach Police Department — including one violation of state penal code for violating a court order — against veteran homicide detective Hugo Cortes in 2016 over his handling of jailhouse informants. He retired before discipline was finalized, but the department found his conduct so egregious it recommended he be terminated. No criminal charges were ever brought against Cortes.

    Cortes could not be reached for comment.

    According to court documents and other records, the informant at the center of the internal affairs investigation, Cortes and other officers told investigators about several gaps in the oversight and supervision of civilian jailhouse informants.

    After an informant helped solve a 2012 quintuple homicide, the department started using them with greater frequency, according to a memo from the Long Beach police leadership included in the investigative files. Cortes told investigators that no one trained him on the tactic and the department used existing policy on confidential informants as guidance, according to the memo.

    “We learned as we go,” Cortes said.

    Cortes told investigators he paid informants in cash with no reliable paper trail.

    “Every time you put (an informant) in a jail cell with somebody, you owe him a thousand dollars. If I put him in with two defendants, I owe him two thousand dollars,” another officer, whose name is redacted in the files, said. The officer was unable to locate payment records for certain periods.

    Cortes became the department go-to for jailhouse informants. “There is no doubt that Detective Cortes has brought this agency to the forefront of Perkins Operations usage,” the statement added.

    How the Long Beach informant case unfolded

    Sometime in late December 2015, someone from the Los Angeles District Attorney’s Office called a Long Beach officer to report that “a Perkins agent who was on special release by the court and supposed to be under 24-hour monitoring via GPS bracelet, was out of custody and had committed a crime in another city and was being investigated.”

    That call kicked off the internal affairs investigation, the files for which were posted on the Long Beach Police Department website in 2022.

    The informant at the center of the investigation had been living in the jail at the Long Beach Police Station for a year when, in October 2015, he struck a plea deal to be released home on a GPS monitor under 24-hour surveillance.

    The plea deal states the informant “will plead guilty” to shooting at an occupied vehicle and will “admit the truth of two prior burglary convictions.”

    The agreement carried a sentence of nine years in state prison, but gave the option to serve that sentence out under house arrest while under 24/7 electronic monitoring. The agreement required the informant to cooperate with the Los Angeles District Attorney’s Office, the L.A. County Sheriff's Department, the Los Angeles Police Department, Long Beach and “any other law enforcement agency”.

    During the course of the internal affairs investigation, the informant said he had worked cases with police departments in Hawthorne, Inglewood and National City in San Diego County.

    The terms of the deal are clear: The informant “may only leave his residence under the direct supervision and monitoring of law enforcement.” He was only allowed to leave to assist law enforcement with criminal investigations, to attend court for his own case or for medical appointments or a “bona fide emergency situation.” He was supposed to be in “the custody and control” of law enforcement while assisting in criminal investigations.

    The internal affairs investigation would show the informant was without his monitor and unsupervised for several days in December 2015 “for no lawful purpose, in violation of the confidential informant’s court-ordered residential arrest plea agreement.”

    According to a summary of the investigation, the informant was not wearing the GPS monitor when he went to a midnight movie on Christmas Day and got into a fight.

    “Witnesses to the incident said (the informant) was intoxicated and started the fight with two subjects then fled,” according to the investigation summary.

    The District Attorney’s Office called Long Beach police days later to ask about the incident. Initially, prosecutors were planning to investigate on their own, but later told Long Beach they could start their own investigation.

    Long Beach police investigators wanted to know if Cortes had given the informant Christmas off, or permission to stop wearing the GPS monitor while he wasn’t actively working for law enforcement.

    Internal affairs investigators found Cortes had sent misleading emails to the company that monitored the GPS devices for Long Beach about the informant’s whereabouts.

    When investigators questioned Cortes about the emails, he said they did not reflect what he had meant to say, according to a summary of those interviews.

    The informant told investigators neither Cortes nor anybody else had given him permission to go off the monitor.

    When investigators told him his handlers were supposed to pick him up from home and drive him to and from the police station for operations so that he remained under supervision, he said that never happened.

    The informant “said he has done 200 operations since 2013 and since the beginning; there has been nothing in writing governing the way the operations were conducted,” according to a summary of his interview.

    The informant said he was “held to a different standard” because his work with law enforcement showed he could be trusted.

    The informant told investigators that he sometimes had to explain the process to detectives that he worked with.

    “This is all new to everyone. Not Perkins per se, but the fact that you have a confidential informant who does the volume of work that I do and the type of work that I do,” he said.

    Cortes told investigators he at one point knew the informant was off his monitor because he was on “stand by” and needed to be ready to be placed in a jail cell on short notice.

    Cortes also told investigators it was not his responsibility to make sure the informant got his monitor reattached, according to transcripts.

    James Trott, an attorney representing Cortes in the investigative process, raised similar concerns with the Perkins system and stated there are no rules or regulations in place for handling informants.

    “My pet peeve is the departments love these guys,” Trott said. “I’ll just deal with this guy, they love this guy. He gets all kinds of good juice for them. Look who you’re dealing with. You’re dealing with the devil.”

    Before he retired, Cortes was removed from all criminal investigations, records show.

    The findings letter sent to Cortes informed him the investigation determined he violated California Penal Code by disobeying a court order.

    Cortes waived his right to a hearing to challenge the findings, but told the department he would write a letter responding to the case. The department had not received a response letter as of Jan. 11, 2017, and no such letter is included in the internal investigations file.

    It appears no charges were ever filed against Cortes, and a deputy L.A. County district attorney said their office had not received a request to open a criminal investigation, according to the investigative summary.

    The informant was put back into custody.

    Then-Long Beach Police Chief Robert Luna, now in his second term as Los Angeles County sheriff, signed the investigative report and, in a handwritten note at the bottom, instructed the department to look into the case and “identify any/all gaps in these kinds of operations to prevent them in the future.”

    LAist emailed questions to Luna and the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department. Luna didn’t respond, but in an unsigned statement, the sheriff’s department said that in March 2018, it incorporated policies and guidelines for the use of confidential sources during law enforcement operations. The statement added that the department “conducts such operations in accordance with applicable laws and legal standards.”

    Far-reaching consequences

    In 2014, Sanders, the defense attorney, began requesting evidentiary hearings about the jailhouse informant program in Orange County, including the use of Perkins informants.

    The evidence that surfaced over three years and several hearings led the court to remove the Orange County District Attorney’s Office from the case and to take the death penalty off the table for Scott Dekraai, the Seal Beach shooter whom Sanders was representing at the time.

    A lawsuit by the ACLU of Southern California and an investigation by the U.S. Department of Justice followed.

    In the Nov. 10 court filing, Sanders argues the Orange County scandal should have prompted the Los Angeles District Attorney’s Office and local police departments to take a hard look at their own jailhouse informant programs.

    According to Sanders, the Cortes investigation, which began in 2015, shows that didn’t happen.

    An April 6, 2016, letter from the District Attorney’s Office informed Cortes he would be added to the office’s Brady alert system — which is meant to track potentially damaging information about officers who testify in court — because he was the subject of an internal affairs investigation.

    The District Attorney’s Office also sent Brady notices to two defendants who had been convicted in a murder case investigated by Cortes in May 2016.

    Sanders argues both descriptions by the District Attorney’s Office vastly understate what really happened.

    The investigation revealed major, systemic problems with Perkins operations throughout L.A. County, Sanders wrote in his most recent filing, but the notifications don’t mention those findings at all. Instead, they focus narrowly on Cortes’ misconduct, Sanders added.

    He argues those findings should have prompted significant investigations and disclosures, not just about conduct by Cortes and this specific informant, but about the countywide Perkins system in general.

    It’s unclear if any of these steps were taken.

    Do you have information to share?

    I'm a watchdog reporter for the LAist newsroom reporting on law enforcement and immigration. If you have a tip related to this story or others, you can reach me on Signal. My username is Jbennett.18.

  • Beloved street vendors were killed in crash
    Night view of the North Hollywood Metro station entrance, where collapsed canopy tents and scattered cans, bottles and debris cover the ground in front of the glass doors.
    Debris lies at the scene of a vehicle crash, involving multiple fatalities, Tuesday, Nov. 10, 2026, in the North Hollywood section of Los Angeles

    Topline:

    Authorities have identified two of the three women killed when the driver of a minivan crashed outside a Los Angeles metro station this week.

    The backstory: The women were food vendors in Los Angeles’ North Hollywood neighborhood who were killed when the minivan plowed into a busy intersection during the height of the evening commute. Friends and family members built a memorial to the women, who were widely known for selling hot dogs and other street food, by leaving flower bouquets, notes, photos and candles on the sidewalk where they were struck.

    Arrest and charges: Police arrested the driver, 61-year-old Ihor Demianenko, for investigation of driving under the influence and three counts of murder. His bail was set at $6 million. It was not immediately known when he would appear in court.

    Authorities have identified two of the three women killed when the driver of a minivan crashed outside a Los Angeles metro station this week.

    The Los Angeles County Medical Examiner identified the women as Teodora Villalobos, 57, and Maria Peck, 73. Both were killed on the sidewalk Tuesday by blunt force injuries, the medical examiner’s office said.

    Authorities did not immediately release the identity of the third victim, pending the notification of family, the medical examiner’s office said in an email on Thursday.

    Peck and Villalobos were food vendors in Los Angeles’ North Hollywood neighborhood who were killed when the minivan plowed into a busy intersection during the height of the evening commute. Friends and family members built a memorial to the women, who were widely known for selling hot dogs and other street food, by leaving flower bouquets, notes, photos and candles on the sidewalk where they were struck.

    Police arrested the driver, 61-year-old Ihor Demianenko, for investigation of driving under the influence and three counts of murder. His bail was set at $6 million. It was not immediately known when he would appear in court.

    Melissa Villalobos told KABC-TV that her mother worked hard and tried to help those in her community.

    “When she sold here, if people didn’t have money to pay for the food, she would still give food to those who didn’t have anything,” she said.

    Peck worked as a vendor for more than a decade six days a week, even on holidays, according to a GoFundMe page set up to support her family. The page said Peck found joy in being part of the community and didn’t want to scale back her hours even as she aged.