Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The debate over phone and data encryption

A Maine legislator wants to make the state the first to require cell phones to carry warnings. A similar effort is afoot in San Francisco, where Mayor Gavin Newsom wants his city to be the nation's first to require the warnings.
A Maine legislator wants to make the state the first to require cell phones to carry warnings. A similar effort is afoot in San Francisco, where Mayor Gavin Newsom wants his city to be the nation's first to require the warnings.
(
Michael Kappeler/AFP/Getty Images
)

Take Two translates the day’s headlines for Southern California, making sense of the news and cultural events that affect our lives. Produced by Southern California Public Radio and broadcast from October 2012 – June 2021. Hosted by A Martinez.

Get LA News Updates Daily

We brief you on what you need to know about L.A. today.
A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right

Among the many after-effects of the attacks in Paris and San Bernardino, a new turn in the debate of data encryption on phones.

The U.S. government wants manufacturers and operating system providers to grant a way to unlock any phone on request. But, for the most part, the phone makers have resisted that idea.

For more on the status of phone encryption, we turn to Kim Zetter, staff reporter at Wired covering cybercrime, privacy and security.  

"The arguments are a reaction to the recent terrorist attacks in Paris and San Bernardino and claims that the attackers, at least in Paris, had used encryption apps like WhatsApp and Telegram to secure their communications" says Zetter. 

Recently, California assembly member Jim Cooper recently introduced a bill that would require manufacturers or operating system providers to include a way for unlocking all phones. 

But companies, in particular, Apple has been pushing back on the idea since it emerged. 

"Having a backdoor for one law enforcement agency creates vulnerability for all users because that back door can be exploited by hackers and other intelligence agencies," says Zetter. 

So far there's no compromise that would be acceptable to both sides.