Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
AirTalk

Should CA repeal its ban on noncompete clauses?

SLOUGH, ENGLAND - FEBRUARY 08:  General view of the empty O2 offices during their flexible working pilot scheme on February 8, 2012 in Slough, England. O2 announced the launch of the biggest flexible working initiative of its kind. Today, employees based at the O2 Slough HQ, a quarter of its 12,000 strong workforce will participate in a flexible working pilot, operating remotely for the day as the doors are shut and lights turned off at the business' 200,000 sq ft office. (Photo by Ian Gavan/Getty Images for O2)
General view of the empty O2 offices on February 8, 2012 in Slough, England.
(
Ian Gavan/Getty Images for O2
)
Listen 17:05
Should CA repeal its ban on noncompete clauses?

Once popular in the domains of high-tech and sales, noncompete clauses are now appearing in new professions. From hair salons to summer camps, employers across the country are putting in noncompete clauses in employment contracts to prevent employees from working for their rivals.

California bans noncompete clauses, but businesses are finding ways to get around the prohibition.

Supporters of the ban--mostly venture capitalists and high-tech companies--say it noncompetes stifle innovation. Opponents--including small businesses--argue that noncompetes encourage companies to invest and retain their workers.  Massachusetts is currently debating whether to put in a noncompete ban. Should California repeal its ban?

Guests:  

Orly Lobel, professor at the University of San Diego School of Law; author of “Talent Wants to be Free” (Yale University Press, 2013) focusing on noncompete clauses

Lee Fleming, Director of Coleman Fung Institute for Engineering Leadership; Professor of Management of Organizations at UC Berkeley who has studied the economic impact of noncompete clauses