Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

POLL: Should there be more surveillance cameras in Los Angeles?

LONDON, ENGLAND - MARCH 31:  Metropolitan Police officers view displays from CCTV cameras around London in the Special Operations Room of their Central Communications Command ahead of the G20 summit of world leaders on March 31, 2009 in London, England. The policing operation for the G20 Summit in London's ExCeL centre and the expected protests throughout the capital is set to be one of the largest and complex police deployments ever involving 2,500 officers.  (Photo by Oli Scarff/Getty Images)
Metropolitan Police officers view displays from CCTV cameras around London in the Special Operations Room in London, England.
(
Oli Scarff/Getty Images
)

When the FBI released images of the two suspects involved in the Boston Marathon bombings, many people found the clarity of these images quite striking. Although many are uncomfortable with the idea of being watched by surveillance cameras, the country was relieved to finally see some progress in identifying suspects in the bombings.

Major cities like London are under constant surveillance with cameras all over the city and in the subway. According to Slate, New York has over 3,000 cameras just for Lower Manhattan. However, in Los Angeles, the LAPD estimates over 300 cameras to cover the entire city — not many for such a large metropolitan area.

Should Los Angeles install more surveillance cameras? Are private security cameras enough? Do cameras deter crime? Would you be uncomfortable with “Big Brother” watching or is it worth it to prevent future tragedies?

Guests:
Chief Edmund “Ted” Sexton, Chief of the Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department

Marc Rotenberg, Executive Director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center