Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
AirTalk

Medical marijuana patients’ right to work

A one-ounce bag of medicinal marijuana is displayed at the Berkeley Patients Group March 25, 2010 in Berkeley, California.
A one-ounce bag of medicinal marijuana is displayed at the Berkeley Patients Group March 25, 2010 in Berkeley, California.
(
Justin Sullivan/Getty Images
)
Listen 22:42
Medical marijuana patients’ right to work
What happens if you have a legal medical marijuana prescription and you test positive in a workplace drug test? Currently it’s grounds for dismissal or for not hiring someone in the first place. New legislation that just passed the Senate Judiciary Committee would make it unlawful “for an employer to discriminate against” persons who are authorized under state law to use medical marijuana. It would also declare it unlawful “for an employer to discriminate against a person in hiring, termination, or any term or condition of employment or otherwise penalize a person, if the discrimination is based upon the person's status as a qualified patient or a positive drug test for marijuana,” if the drug test result is indicative of previous, off-the-job marijuana use. A similar bill passed the senate and assembly in 2008 but was vetoed by then-Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, so is the climate any different now? Business owners are clearly fearful of liability issues, but what other reasons do they have for strongly opposing this legislation? And what about federal drug laws that are already in place?

What happens if you have a legal medical marijuana prescription and you test positive in a workplace drug test? Currently it’s grounds for dismissal or for not hiring someone in the first place. New legislation that just passed the Senate Judiciary Committee would make it unlawful “for an employer to discriminate against” persons who are authorized under state law to use medical marijuana. It would also declare it unlawful “for an employer to discriminate against a person in hiring, termination, or any term or condition of employment or otherwise penalize a person, if the discrimination is based upon the person's status as a qualified patient or a positive drug test for marijuana,” if the drug test result is indicative of previous, off-the-job marijuana use. A similar bill passed the senate and assembly in 2008 but was vetoed by then-Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, so is the climate any different now? Business owners are clearly fearful of liability issues, but what other reasons do they have for strongly opposing this legislation? And what about federal drug laws that are already in place?

Guests:

John Kabateck, Executive Director, National Federation of Independent Business, California

Joe Elford, Chief Counsel, Americans for Safe Access. He helped state Sen. Mark Leno draft this legislation