Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
AirTalk

Amateur shrinks and professional psychiatrists analyze Trump, Clinton

Up to 100 million people are expected to watch Hilary Clinton and Donald Trump square off.
In this composite image a comparison has been made between former US Presidential Candidates Hillary Clinton (L) and Donald Trump.
(
Alex Wong/Getty Images
)
Listen 16:57
Amateur shrinks and professional psychiatrists analyze Trump, Clinton

Amateur shrinks AKA average voters have every right to analyze the minds of presidential candidates - and during this cycle, it can be too tempting to resist.

However, professional psychiatrists who cannot restrain themselves from diagnosing Donald Trump's id and ego are violating the "Goldwater Rule" established by the American Psychiatry Association. As Benedict Carey recounts in "The New York Times," the Republican presidential candidate of 1964, Barry Goldwater, similarly inspired diagnoses from shrinks across the land.

At the time, more than 1,000 psychiatrists surveyed said Goldwater was psychologically unfit for the presidency. The news stoked controversy and later was deemed unethical by the aforementioned association.

How skilled do you think you are in diagnosing public figures? Looking back on Presidents Richard Nixon, Lyndon Johnson, George W. Bush, and Bill Clinton, for instance, how did their behavior get analyzed at the time?

Guest:

Benedict Carey, Science Reporter for The New York Times; Author, “How We Learn” (Random House; 2014)