Support for LAist comes from
Made of L.A.
Stay Connected

Share This

This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.


Would Restoring the Malibu Lagoon Actually Destroy It?

Our June member drive is live: protect this resource!
Right now, we need your help during our short June member drive to keep the local news you read here every day going. This has been a challenging year, but with your help, we can get one step closer to closing our budget gap. Today, put a dollar value on the trustworthy reporting you rely on all year long. We can't hold those in power accountable and uplift voices from the community without your partnership.

Photo by faria! via the LAist Featured Photos pool on Flickr

Photo by faria! via the LAist Featured Photos pool on Flickr
Environmentalists are divided over the proposed $7 million plan to restore the Malibu Lagoon, according to the LA Times.

Tomorrow the Coastal Commission will consider the plan, which will see to it the lagoon's "stagnant, polluted waterways" be drained and rectified in order to better its "ecological health."

However the fix could also be its own demise:

Support for LAist comes from
Although most conservation groups support the project and the coastal panel's staff has recommended approval, some activists say the heavy grading, use of construction equipment and ripping out of vegetation is heavy-handed and would essentially destroy the habitat in order to save it.

The lagoon's well-being has been an issue for several years; the Malibu Creek Watershed Council was part of a task force that conducted a study of the projectwith UCLA in 1997-2000, while Heal the Bay was part of the team behind the restoration endeavor, for which Phase 1 was completed in April 2008.

Work on the restoration would begin next year, should the Commission approve the project tomorrow. If so, the organizations involved are betting on the temporary disruption being a part of a larger, positive, long-term improvement.

Most Read