Sustain LAist today!

Your monthly gift during our June member drive powers our local newsroom.
1,535 sustainers of 2,500 goal
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.

News

One Reason to Vote June 3rd: The 'Rent Control' Law

This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.

Photo by pepewk via Flickr

June 3rd is not going to be a very popular day for Californians to come out to the polls when compared to last February's Super Tuesday primary. Nonetheless, among electing state and congressional politicians, there are only two propositions on the ballot and they are stirring up controversy. Prop 98 and 99 are like good cop, bad cop, depending on how you feel about the issues, or maybe better put, if you're a landlord or not.

Prop 98 help limits government eminent domain, but under the guise of that, rent control could essentially be eliminated if passed. A provision in the bill also includes letting landlords raise rents to a unit after someone moves out, leading to more reason to look for easy evictions. There are a million rent controlled units in California, nearly 700,000 of them are in the Los Angeles area, most in the city of Los Angeles.

"Proposition 98 is a wolf in sheep's clothing that would roll back key environmental and tenant protections," Los Angeles City Council President Eric Garcetti told the Daily News' Dana Bartholomew. Garcetti wrote a city resolution against 98 last week and supports Prop 99. "It would protect Californians from government taking property that should remain in private hands, but wouldn't negatively impact other important environmental and tenant laws."

Resources
Yes on Prop 98 | No on Prop 98
Yes on Prop 99 | Opponents say go to Yes on Prop 98

Previous Opinion
-- A Tremendously Efficient Way To Make Life Harder for Californians

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today