Support for LAist comes from
We Explain L.A.
Stay Connected

Share This

News

LA Drops from #3 to #16 on Forbes' List of 'Best Cities for Singles'

LAist relies on your reader support, not paywalls.
Freely accessible local news is vital. Please power our reporters and help keep us independent with a donation today.
5b2ba9bd4488b30009267a41-original.jpg

Los Angeles drops down to number 16 on Forbes.com's list of Best Cities for Singles. | Photo by Hamed Masoumi via flickr

As a city known for its beautiful weather and beautiful people, you'd think it would be difficult to name a more ideal city for singles than Los Angeles. However, Forbes.com, actually found 15 other cities that they think are a better fit for bachelors and bachelorettes in their "8th Annual Best Cities for Singles" list.

5b2ba9be4488b30009267a43-original.jpg
Support for LAist comes from

LA's ranking of number 16 on the annual list that the national business magazine's Web site compiled, marks a 13 spot drop from 2007's results. What caused LA to drop from 3 to 16? The article, written by Forbes.com Executive Editor Michael Noer says, "Blame the cost of living in sun-drenched SoCal and a lackadaisical online dating culture."

Our wallets agree with that knock on LA's cost of living. But "lackadaisical online dating culture"? Clearly Noer has not driven around Los Angeles and spotted any of these signs in every damn neighborhood.

Atlanta took the top spot on the list, which is described by Forbes.com as a ranking of "the 40 largest urbanized areas in mainland America in seven different categories: number of singles, nightlife, culture, cost of living alone, job growth, online dating activity and coolness."