Support for LAist comes from
We Explain L.A.
Stay Connected

Share This

News

Gold Vs. Purple: Advocates Choose Their Trains

LAist relies on your reader support.
Your tax-deductible gift today powers our reporters and keeps us independent. We rely on you, our reader, not paywalls to stay funded because we believe important news and information should be freely accessible to all.
5b2c58a44488b3000927f946-original.jpg

Gold Line Photo by Fred Camino/MetroRiderLA and Metro Subway photo by Kwasi B.

Next week, the Metro board will vote on two very important issues. One will put a half-cent sales tax increase, that would raise funds for public transit, on November's ballot. The other is the Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP), a document guiding public transit in Los Angeles County for years to come.

Gold Line advocates, who wish to see the line extend from Pasadena to Azusa (then Montclair, then Ontario International Airport), are asking the board to move the eastwardly extension from the unfunded to the funded portion of the LRTP, according to the LA Times' Road Sage, Steve Hymon. If that happens, they would get an $80 million boost to the $400 million project. San Gabriel Valley officials say they can take care of the rest.

Support for LAist comes from

But the problem comes with the half-cent sales tax increase. If Gold Line gurus don't get what they want, they threaten (in hint form) to advocate for residents to vote down the increase on the November ballot (because, after all, what do they get? Butterfly effects may not be enough). And that constituency base could ultimately fail the measure, affecting transportation funding throughout the region, including the Westside extension (the Purple Line's 'Subway to the Sea' plan).