Quantcast

Possible Porn Exodus? Production Companies Consider Leaving L.A. Post-Condom Law Approval

colorful-condoms-line-shutterstock.jpg
Photo by PeJo via Shutterstock

L.A. City Council's nearly unanimous vote granting final approval to the condoms in porn ordinance is supported by some members of the multibillion dollar porn industry. Those in opposition, however, may pack up set and head elsewhere.

The City of Los Angeles Safer Sex In The Adult Film Industry Act ordinance, which City Council voted 9-1 in favor of on Tuesday, requires adult film actors to use condoms while on set. Production companies will also be forced to pay film permit fees of an amount yet to be determined, which will in turn fund inspections enforced by the city. Los Angeles, a city that produces 90% of the nation's porn films, is the first city in America to approve such a law.

The measure will go to Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, who is supportive of the ordinance, for approval. Before the new law becomes effective, the council has requested a committee comprised of police officials, the city attorney, state health officials and others spearhead logistics for proper condom law enforcement.

Steven Hirsch, co-founder and co-chairman of L.A.-based Vivid, says, "Ultimately I think what they will find is people will just stop shooting in the city of Los Angeles. That's a given," reports NY Daily News. Vivid is one of the biggest erotic porn producers and one that will consider leaving should the measure be passed.

Many industry professionals are curious as to how the law will be enforced, funded and manage to be time-efficient. "It's going to be interesting to see how in fact they do try to enforce it and whose going to fund it and all of the time and effort they're going to spend," said Hirsch.

The ordinance is seen by many as political overstepping in a land where such enforcement should not and cannot be achieved. Nina Hartley, an adult film actress and registered nurse, said, "It's pure politics. It's not going to make anybody safer," adding that the condom law will spur more underground filming. Porn industry representatives say that protected sex does not sell as well and is "hard" on performers' bodies during especially lengthy sessions. Los Angeles, specifically the San Fernando Valley, is America's porn capital. But it could soon lose its luster and clever nicknames like "Porn Valley" and "San Pornando Valley."

"The only thing that the city could potentially achieve is losing some film permit money and driving some productions away, but you can't actually compel an industry to create a product that the market doesn't want," said Christian Mann, general manager of Evil Angel, another major porn production player. Mann noted that smaller productions manned by just a few people can most probably elude the new law, but larger scale production companies cannot and may likely leave town.

San Fernando Valley-based nonprofit Free Speech Coalition, a porn industry lobbying group, will not take the law lying down and are prepared for battle. "We're looking at all of our options and talking to the industry heads, said Diane Duke, a member of the group. "The government is intruding into the sexual behavior of consenting adults."

Contact the author of this article or email tips@laist.com with further questions, comments or tips.

Comments [rss]

  • Why is this showing up in my DCist "local view"?

  • RedMercury

    Saw this on a comics site I like to read.  Ten reasons the porn industry should move to Philadelphia:

    (1.) Sure it's illegal. So is parking in the median in South Philly. Fuggedaboutit.

    (2.) Oh gosh, where to start? Vince Fumo supposedly strong-armed donations for charities that he allegedly benefitted from personally. And didn't Milton Street force his way into a Democratic primary -- to run against his own nephew -- despite a lack of the proper amount of ballots and a possible residency dispute? I guess what I'm saying is, Philadelphia is the perfect home for an industry that seems obsessed with big dicks.

    (3) What's porn without bad 70s funk? "Bow-chicka-wow-wow"...? We wrote that!

    (4) The city's motto: "The city that loves you back" really means something now.

    (5) The Catholic Church has announced the closings of 48 of its schools in Philadelphia. That's gonna mean a surplus of schoolgirl uniforms.

    (6) Bondage experts? Look no further that the thousands who spend every morning tied up on the Schuylkill Expressway.

    (7) Parodies are hot in porn right now -- with moves like "Not Bewitched," "Not Three's Company," and "Not Married With Children." Meet our football team, "Not going to the Super Bowl." (Part Eight.) 

    (8) John Bolaris is available.

    (9) Chopped beef, onions and cheese. Now that's a threesome.

    (10) And I'm not just talking about straight porn, either. This is the City of Brotherly Love.

  • thegodofthor

    When is Los Angeles going to require inmates to use condoms as they rape the weaker inmates. Until you can go to jail in this city without being anally raped (with no condoms) this is just a damn  joke. 

  • DonKeysHoTea

    i vote for porn to "cum" to DC. we're used to screwing people for money, and doing it on camera. most of our elected representatives already smoke enough pole on K street to give any porn stars a bit of helpful advice. how about "cock-you-pie" DC? from establishing shot to money shot, washington is waiting with open... well, you fill in the blanks.

  • dcbsky

    Attention Downey City Council:  A lot of people are angry that the old North American Rockwell/Boeng site is being converted into yet another shopping mall. Many say they wanted another big industry to move into those huge empty buildings, so....

  • ChicagoD

    Isn't Las Vegas a more appropriate place for this industry? Tons of empty "sets" (what we call "houses"), close to LA, all the porn stars advertise that they turn tricks there anyway . . . Seems to me a win/win.

  • Paul

    Just because a girl will have sex with people on film (safely, as they are tested for STDs) - doesn't mean they'll have sex with random people who aren't tested.

  • ChicagoD
  • So ... did you just have those links handy, D, or did you go googling just now?

  • ChicagoD

    A little of column A, a little of column B.

  • Is that your standard order?

  • I look forward to porn losing the plastic titted women of LA and hiring some more natural looking women.

  • westlafadeaway

    Where do you get your porn?!  Don't you know there is something for everyone now?  

  • edgie168

    the problem is that a lot of those chicks end up getting "augmented" anyway.

  • JC

    How much mileage are you hoping to get out of this story?  It's getting less interesting with every new installment.  What is this, Pornoist?

  • ThomasEarlham

    It's a story about a significant development in a major industry ($400 billion annually) which is largely based in L.A. The story involves the City Council. the mayor, and hundreds if not thousands of potential job losses in the city. The L.A. Times has covered this story, as have the Washington Post and NPR. Whatever hang-ups you may have about sex or porn have no bearing on the newsworthiness of this article.

  • JC

    Read my comments to the other two stories about this over the past 24 hours and you will discover that I have no hang-ups whatsoever.  Three in a row is just a little much. 

  • ThomasEarlham

    Apologies. I lumped you in with all the nimrods with knee-jerk 19th Century attitudes about every porn-related story on LAist.

  • westlafadeaway

    It's just filling in the time between Adultcons.  I wouldn't mind but LAist went to a policy of not running NSFW images a year or two ago.  At least give us a better picture! :)

  • Gothampc

    No, it's Gothamist, the website that does stories about New York City...oh wait scratch that.  This isn't a story about New York City.  Maybe this is Pornoist.

  • FU Boy

    Check the icon - this is LA-ist.   Geez man, giving us gothamist-ers a bad name 'round the web-ter-net.

  • diablofreak

    it was unnecessarily crossed posted to gothamist. note how any posts that deal with sex or porn will be cross posted. anything for a page click though, amirite?

  • FU Boy

    Well, I heard about this a while ago through friends in the industry.  Didn't know it's close to passing.

    Would be a seriously idiotic move.  Sure, put the warning up saying this is risky and the actors involved are closely screened.  Fine. 

    But to mandate condoms in filming is like the marijuana laws.  People are still going to make the product, because other people want it.  The people who do it responsibly now will have their hands tied, and those that don't do it ethically will start raking in money.
     
    That's just a dumb call. 

    PS - porn isn't relevant to new york? Shit, I'd argue we consume a hell of a lot more of it that LA.

blog comments powered by Disqus

send a tip

tips@laist.com