Quantcast

The LAPD, Obama, and the National Defense Authorization Act: WTF?

"Shut your fucking mouth! We can lose you in here."

That's what "Officer K" of the Los Angeles Police Department's Metro Detention facility said to me as I was lining up to be bailed out with 8 other arrestees forty hours after my own arrest at the raid of the Occupy LA encampment. It seems "Officer K" wanted me not to discuss legal instructions from the glass of the neighboring pod, D block, from a few of the occupiers who had not been able to contact their lawyers two days into their arrest.

Not having planned to be arrested nor memorized my attorney's landline phone number (have you?) I'd asked Family Guy writer Patrick Meighan, my bunkmate who got out four hours earlier, to get in touch with my lawyer on my behalf. Though it was someone else who bonded me out, I was surprised but glad that I had been sprung and could say goodbye to the prison catering done by the same company used by the Los Angeles Unified School District. "Officer K" may been merely trying to provoke a response out of me, but the behavior was unacceptable of someone sworn to "Serve and Protect."

So how does a tale of civilian police and how they handle arrested protesters connect to national politics and policy?

"Shut your fucking mouth! We can lose you in here" becomes even more poignant as the constitutionally challenged National Defense Authorization Act for 2012 sits on President Obama's desk. As it currently stands, spokespeople for Obama have stated he would not veto it.

"Human rights groups are disappointed with the president’s decision to walk away from his veto threat," according to ABC News, who report the White House supports the bill now that "the authors of the bill removed language that would have restricted the administration’s handling of terrorist detainees."

As Cenk Uygur of The Young Turks explains, the NDAA declares the whole world a battlefield as we engage the whole world, presumably, on the "war on terror." In it are suspensions on the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878, which includes the prohibition of arrest of Americans by our own military... indefinitely without habeas corpus for any reasons it wants. Senators McCain and Levin have cooked up a foul menu of the corruption of the Bill of Rights: secret arrests, secret detentions without trial, suspension of civil rights and torture a la Guantanamo. While the bill passed the Senate and House with bipartisan support, opposition is equally diverse from both Senators Rand Paul and Bernie Sanders. Amnesty International, yes the Free Biko/Apartheid NGO, are rallying support for the blockage of the NDAA. Similarily on the Right, the Roanoke Tea Party, a group that is what it sounds like has published photos of the constitution going up in flames on its website.

In California you can still contact Senators Dianne Feinstein and Barbara Boxer to let them know how you feel.

Or, you can, as per LAPD "Officer K's" advice, "Shut your fucking mouth." if you are okay with this sort of editing of your civil liberties.

Contact the author of this article or email tips@laist.com with further questions, comments or tips.

Comments [rss]

  • Left or Right Ron Paul is the only candidate that understands the Constitution. Want real change? If we follow the constitution, you'll actually get it. I'm the guy from the Roanoke Tea Party referenced in the story.
  • Shawn Tippie
    or Ron Paul in 2012!
  • westlafadeaway
    On this issue I'll agree.  Few others.
  • I_Heart_Obama111
    Don't worry, we got rid of that bastard Bush, cause .. that was the problem all along right? it's bush's fault, it's all bush's fault, I mean, he's not just a scapegoat right? Not just an easy target so that smart people like us won't realize who the real enemy is... right? We voted for Obama, so everything's gonna be ok now! We put the blue into the majority everywhere, and we got rid of Conan the Red as our gov. so everything's fine now right? ... .Right?? ... umm Right?
  • Billteud
    I liked Obama until I realized he's a secret Republican.
  • westlafadeaway
    I'm certainly disappointed in Obama's caving on civil liberties but it is in fact still Bush's fault who got this ball rolling and less Obama's fault for not being able to get ANYTHING through the GOP congress (not even raising the debt ceiling) without legislation being held hostage.

    The buck stops with Obama though so like I said it's very disappointing - but apart from Kucinich (and maybe Edwards dare I mention) I was not under any illusions that the next Dem president be it Hillary or Barack would play to this middle and to capitalist interests.

    I voted for him but never thought it would make things "fine".  And when I vote for him again (alternatives?) I also won't make that assumption.
  • seems like the government has declared war on americans.
    who would have thunk it ?
  • bd_in_ohio
    As far as I'm concerned, that's a felony-grade threat: the detainment without charge, bond, or trial of a [sigh] non-terrorist American citizen is tantamount to kidnapping.

    Is this really what our police have become? I've seen similar crap in my own community, and I think that under all of this is a desperate need for law enforcement to take a long, hard look at what it has become.

    In any case, there's no way it can be proven in a court of law to that court's standards that this cop actually said this, no matter how many witnessed it. But it's something LAPD (Or whatever agency manages that jail, LA County Sheriff, perhaps) should be taking deadly seriously. That's a real problem, and left unaddressed, it will metastasize.
  • factchecq
    The law, as amended, applies to terror suspects caught in US that are NOT US citizens. As amended, US citizens lose no rights that that they did not lose in the patriot act. The officer in the story is not a lawyer. I am not saying I support the act, but the older version is dead. This change does not affect US citizens.
  • you've got it backwards. the original act did not allow for US citizens to be detained indefinitely by the military. the revised, current, version of the act gives the president discretion to detain US citizens indefinitely either in military or federal prisons, without being charged or given trial. the president said he would veto the act not because it was too severe, but because he would not sign any act that limited the executive branch's ability to detain suspected terrorists, American citizen or not. Now that the act has been revised to include the ability to detain US citizens the president will likely sign it.  I know that sounds crazy, but it's true.
  • Enygma Seven
    "Is this really what our police have become?"
    YES!
blog comments powered by Disqus

send a tip

tips@laist.com