Quantcast

L.A. City Attorney's Office Files Suit Against Condoms in Porn Initiative

condoms.jpg
Photo by robertelyov via Flickr.

The L.A. City Attorney's office apparently does not want voters determining the fate of safe sex in the local porn industry. City attorneys filed suit against AIDS Healthcare Foundation (AHF) in L.A. County Superior Court on Thursday.

Spearheading the efforts for the June 2012 ballot initiative, dubbed City of Los Angeles Safer Sex In The Adult Film Industry Act, AHF has gathered over 71,000 signatures in support of the measure, exceeding the 41,138 signatures needed by December 23 to qualify the initiative for the ballot. Michael Weinstein, AHF president, told Huffington Post, "I think it's extraordinary to attempt to thwart the will of 71,000 voters who under the laws of the city of Los Angeles wish to see this measure put before the voters."

AVN reports that "many" of the signatures obtained by AHF were done so "by misleading the public as to the initiative's effects."

City attorneys say the measure is unnecessary and will waste taxpayer money. State laws already exist mandating workplace safety, as stated in the lawsuit, but Ged Kenslea, a spokesman for AHF, says these laws are not enforced.

The measure would connect the issuance of adult film permits by the City of L.A. to condom use in adult films shot and produced in L.A. It would also require fee collection from adult film permit recipients to allow periodic inspections of sets to monitor compliance.

The lawsuit asks that the validity of the initiative be determined before the June 5 election "because, were the initiative to pass, and a court were to rule then that the initiative violated state law, such a result would 'undermine public trust in the petition process,' 'undermine the public trust in the government institutions and election officials who play a role in the qualification of measures for the ballot' and 'undermine[] the credibility of the elections process in general, which is amongst our most treasured and essential democratic institutions,'" reports AVN.

Lauding the city's decision to file suit, The Free Speech Coalition - a trade association for the porn industry - has been battling AHF since the measure's launch in August 2011, claiming that the measure "squanders its donor resources," says Huffington Post.

Contact the author of this article or email tips@laist.com with further questions, comments or tips.

Comments [rss]

  • I'm a former porn actress fighting for safety and health in the
    porn industry. Check out shocking footage of women abused on the porn
    set (a California workplace): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...
     

  • lax2hnl

    "We need a ballot measure that says you cannot pay people to collect signatures. Then we will see how many of these dumb measures get on the ballot."

    do you think if they tried to get that ballot measure on the ballot, they would pay people to get signatures for it?  the irony!

  • thegodofthor

    I was asked to sign one of these at my local Ralphs. When I asked the kid that was collecting signatures for 3 different ballot measures what he actually knows about this measure and the industry itself, he completely balked. He not only knew nothing the stuff he was spouting was completely wrong. 

    There are many jobs you can do that are far far far more dangerous then being a porn star. Maybe we should outlaw deep sea fishing. While we are at it Logging is really dangerous too. 

    Fiddling with this industry could send them to Eastern Europe where the tallent is plentiful and the tax is low. 

    We need a ballot measure that says you cannot pay people to collect signatures. Then we will see how many of these dumb measures get on the ballot. 

blog comments powered by Disqus

send a tip

tips@laist.com