Quantcast

Map Shows How Fast (or Slow) Buses Move in Los Angeles

metro.jpg
Photo by Eric Fischer via Flickr

The hottest trend among cartographers is grabbing data from NextBus and using it to create maps that help visualize just how long it takes to get around on public transportation in whatever city you choose.

The digital cartographer Eric Fischer that helped kick off the trend with his map of the MUNI system in the Bay Area released his own visualization of the Los Angeles transit system. We've posted the map above (or you can check out the giant-sized one that wouldn't fit on our blog on Flickr).

Fischer used data from last Thursday to create the map and the legend goes as follows:

Black = Less than 7 mph
Red = 7-18 mph
Blue = 19-42 mph
Green = More than 43 mph

On this Thursday, he figured the average bus moved about 10 mph including stops and his visualization helps you see where buses moved the slowest and fastest — although it is a little hard to tell which streets are which since they're not labeled.

Downtown, unsurprisingly, is the most clogged, and it looks like there are tentacles of gridlock radiating out from it. Sunset gets pretty crowded from around Los Feliz through Hollywood and West Hollywood and there's a lot of black in Santa Monica. It looks like buses on the Harbor Freeway and the 10 east of downtown have the most green out of any thoroughfare.

(Note: if you get a little jealous looking at all that green on the San Francisco map, keep in mind that the comparison is sort of apples and oranges. From what I can tell, rail doesn't factor into Fischer's L.A. map.)

It would be pretty sweet if we could learn how to make these maps ourselves so we could visualize how the Oscars, Obamajam, Carmageddon or even just a light rainstorm drive us crazy.

Cartographer Matt Wigway also has his own visualization of Los Angeles metro speeds, which shows slightly different results — buses that travel on freeways look like much bigger winners. It's hard to tell how their methodology differs.

Contact the author of this article or email tips@laist.com with further questions, comments or tips.

Comments [rss]

  • LA MapNerd

    One methodological difference:  Fischer uses only four color-coded categories, with fenceposts at 7,19, and 43 mph.    Wigway uses seven categories, with fenceposts at 10,15, 20, 25, 35, and 50 mph.

    As for SF vs. LA: As you note, the LA map doesn't include rail service, since Metro doesn't provide NextBus with real-time train positions, and Metrolink isn't covered by NextBus.  Also, Nextbus doesn't include most of the LA-area municipal agencies that operate express or commuter buses on freeways - LADOT Commuter Express, Santa Monica Big Blue Bus , Culver City Bus, Foothill Transit, Antelope Valley Transit, or Santa Clarita Transit.

  • So, basically what you're stating is this static map is worthless.

  • My comment is, will anyone ever see my comment?

blog comments powered by Disqus

send a tip

tips@laist.com