Quantcast

Parks and Rec Throws Out Another Figure For Occupy L.A.'s Cost to City Hall Grounds

Occupy_LA_foreclosures.jpg
Photo by Lauren Lloyd

If there's one department that's worried about the Occupy L.A. encampment, it's the city's Recreation and Parks Department.

The department released its third estimate of how occupiers are wreaking havoc on the lawn, shrubbery and sprinkler-heads around City Hall. Two weeks into the movement, the department said damage to the lawn would cost the city $50,000. Occupiers responded by saying they would canvas for donations to fix the lawn. A few days later, the department's general manager Jon Kirk Mukri said the sod replacement and sprinkler damage could cost the city $400,000. (City councilman Dennis Zine was skeptical it could cost that much.)

Now Mukri is lowering his estimate and saying that the bill is $120,000, according to a memo obtained by City Maven. The memo blames occupiers for dry soil, nutrient-starved trees, broken sprinkler-heads and wear and tear to trees caused by protestors hooking their tents up to the trees for stability. The department is passing out fliers to occupiers so that they will not cause any more damage to the trees. It complains that the protestors are monopolizing the park and no one else is getting to enjoy it and warns that someone might get hurt while camping and sue the city.

"The persons now living on the grounds of the park have: 1) created several unsafe conditions; 2) monopolized the park grounds, thus limiting access for other park users; 3) greatly impacted (Recreation and Park’s) ability to properly maintain and irrigate the park; and, 4) caused damage to the park grounds including landscaped areas, hardscape areas, and trees,” Mukri wrote in the memo.

The memo also complains that because there are so many people camped out, the department couldn't get a proper estimate of how much it's going to cost the city in the end. We'll keep our eyes peeled for the next estimate. (Especially if out-of-town protestors looking for sunny skies show up this winter.)

Contact the author of this article or email tips@laist.com with further questions, comments or tips.

Comments [rss]

  • Guest

    My GAWD you guys are idiots. You all have no concern for this waste of taxpayer money. This is a LAME response to the cost, Emma Gallegos. Ya know, us taxpayers are a part of this 99% you say you represent. I think its time for you to redo your math because your disapproval rating is increasing by the minute. Go occupy a jail cell.

  • Oh boo fucking hoo!

    Why don't you go to Beverly Hills and sit on a street corner with a sign offering free ass kissings for the wealthy!

    These occupy people are fighting for your future as well their own and you're worried about the City Hall's lawn which they've already said they cover the cost of fixing. Or maybe you like the idea of a rapidly shrinking middle class. I doubt you will when you're living in a card board box because your job has been outsourced to another country.

    And while you're mulling that over, listen to a new one from Garfunkle and Oakes...

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...

  • Guest

    Oh, they are fighting for MY future. So I should probably thank them then. Maybe give a cash donation. Thanks for pointing that out.

blog comments powered by Disqus

send a tip

tips@laist.com