This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.
This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
DA Won't File Charges Against Cops Who Fatally Shot Long Beach Man Wielding a Water Nozzle
This undated photo provided by the family of Douglas Zerby shows Zerby, left, and his then-fiancee Tina. (AP Photo/Family Photo)
The district attorney's office said today that it wasn't going to file any criminal charges against police who shot a Long Beach man who turned out to be "armed" only with a water nozzle.The officers acted “lawfully in self-defense and in the defense of others” when they shot 35-year-old Douglas Zerby on Dec. 12, 2010, the district attorney’s office said in a statement, according to the Associated Press.
The shooting happened last December on a Sunday afternoon when a neighbor called the police, thinking that Zerby was drunk and armed with a gun. He was drunk, but he turned out to be wielding nothing more than a "black pistol-grip water nozzle. Long Beach Police Chief Jim McDonnell said at the time that his officers "believed the man had a gun and were awaiting the arrival of backup when the man pointed the object in a two-handed posture that looked like what a person would do when they are about to fire a weapon."
Zerby's family was concerned that the officers who responded to the call about a possibly intoxicated man did not identify themselves before opening fire. They have filed a federal civil rights and wrongful-death lawsuit against the city, which will continue, according to the family's attorney.
You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.
Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.
If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.
If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief
