Quantcast

Come 2012, Kiss Goodbye to Clean Energy, California

California's clean energy projects will lose around $400 million in funding in 2012 due to the elimination of the so-called public goods charge. This surcharge, paid by customers of Southern California Edison and other investor-owned utilities, adds a practically unnoticeable $1 to $2 each month to the average residential electric bill and helps fund energy efficiency programs and research. Some of these said initiatives have led to the development of LED light fixtures, wireless lighting controls and improved water heaters and thermostats.

Governor Brown highly prioritizes clean energy, but the Legislature failed to gain the two-thirds vote needed by Friday's deadline to extend the tax beyond December 31, 2011. Martin Schlageter, Coalition for Clean Air's Campaign Director, says the failure is "an incredible shame," reports LA Daily News. "I think extending this tax was basically a no-brainer," he said.

The surcharge has been enforced since 1997, and Jim Metropulos, senior advocate with the Sierra Club, warns that "because funding is not guaranteed after this year, agencies will probably start winding down their projects." He hopes Governor Brown will persevere and restore the surcharge.

President of the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association Jon Coupal claims the surcharge is both "anti-consumer" and "unnecessary," adding, "If green energy is efficient, then companies will pursue it on their own, because it's in their own best interests."

Contact the author of this article or email tips@laist.com with further questions, comments or tips.

Comments [rss]

  • The myopic legislators that voted against this extension and their constituents should all move to Texas.

  • WHAT?? It's never going to be efficient until it's become a standard! We're already killing our own world slowly with our "efficiency". 

  • Such great project failed to gain the two-thirds vote? What are those politician thinking about?~

  • miguel2299

    This is bullshit

  • exbaytriate

    What the hell is wrong with all of you people that are afraid to pay your taxes? Is drinking seven 500 calorie Starbucks lattes a week worth your and your children's futures? Why don't you cut it to five a week and that additional $40/month could go to the places that make the world better (like schools). 

  • PicoPhreako69

    Exactly.
    Even though I was barely a young adult when Jarvis got Prop 13 passed, I knew it was just bad, bad, bad....  Kind of the first shot across the bow of the Tea Party. 
    Why do so many people end up supporting things that are completely against their best interests...
    Maybe it's time for the aliens to invade and just clean up the planet (read: exterminate all human life).  I dunno.

  • Here is an important event happening tomorrow...

    http://climaterealityproject.o...

  • Economist2011

    Conservation should not have to depend on voluntary compliance. It's ALWAYS easier to pollute than clean up. 

    I hope the Howard Jarvis people get afford a clue with all the money they love to save.

  • This is "conservation" via "conservatives". 

blog comments powered by Disqus

send a tip

tips@laist.com