Quantcast

New Study Shows Pregnant California Women Have High Levels Of Flame Retardant In Their Blood

pregnant_woman_bikini.jpg
Photo by flequi via Flickr.

A new study at UC San Francisco released on Wednesday states that pregnant California women have registered "some of the highest levels of the toxic flame retardant PBDE in their bodies ever recorded worldwide," reports LA Times.

Testing 25 pregnant women from Northern and Central California in their second-trimesters in 2008 and 2009, the research team discovered that their blood showed high levels of polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs). These chemicals are harmful to the liver, thyroid and nerve development and have been banned in California since 2004.

Researchers believe the high levels are due to California's strict flammability regulations enacted in the 1970s which permitted manufacturers to add flame retardants to a bevvy of products.

Ami Zota, the study's lead author, believes that U.S. native minority and low-income women were possibly more likely to have been exposed to the chemicals from using secondhand furniture or residing in poorly ventilated low-income housing.

"What we've seen is if people are born outside of the U.S., like in Mexico, and migrate to the U.S., their exposures are already lower. The theory is Mexico used less of these chemicals so an immigrant's exposure in Mexico was lower than when they were in California," Zota said.

Women can try reducing their exposure by doing the following actions.

*Dust and wet-mop their homes.

*Wash their hands frequently.

*Avoid foam furniture and other products.

Limiting exposure, however, is a challenge.

"Ultimately, it's very hard to avoid our exposures to these products because they're so widespread," Zota said. "We need policy measures."

The study did not include SoCal women, which leaves us wondering about PBDE levels in our pregnant ladies.

Contact the author of this article or email tips@laist.com with further questions, comments or tips.

Comments [rss]

  • jennix

    Not as terrifying as that photo.

  • Oh yeah, years ago there was a flame retardant battle with infant clothing, your body absorbs that stuff easily and we don't know the full extent of the effects from the chemicals. Industry chemicals = innocent until proven guilty, but the problem with toxicology like this is the time between exposure and illness, so it's difficult to pin anything down. With that fight over fire retardants in infant clothing (which they replaced with a similar chemical that is just as dangerous) the company that manufactured the chemicals came out with all sorts of "do you want our babies to all die in fires - you monster!" ads when it was on the ballot to ban the use of their fire retardant on infant clothing. But the thing is these chemicals just add to the smoke in the fire and make it much more toxic to come in contact with, and really only hold back the flames for 3-4 seconds. Fire doesn't kill, smoke does. So it really just defeats the purpose in the first place...

    Chemical companies trying to make as much money as possible, and poisoning us in the process. This isn't news! :P

  • thehighandlow

    Guh, this is terrifying.

blog comments powered by Disqus

send a tip

tips@laist.com