Quantcast

All Aboard the Carcinogen Express: Study Finds Red Line Commuters Exposed to Twice as Much Polluted Air Than on Gold Line

Of Metro's Red Line subway and Gold Line light rail, which puts commuters at more of a risk of exposure to potentially hazardous air pollutants? A study conducted by the University of Southern California finds that Red Line riders are exposed to up to twice as much unhealthy air as those on the Gold Line.

The study was conducted by Constantinos Sioutas, Fred Champion professor of civil and environmental engineering in the USC Viterbi School of Engineering, who "measured the concentrations and chemical composition of fine and coarse particles in the air while riding on the Red Line and the Gold Line of the Los Angeles Metro using small carry-on suitcases equipped with portable air samplers," explains USC in a release. Sioutas used USC as a control site location to represent "typical urban air quality levels in LA."

The testing revealed the following:

The amount of particulate matter in the air on the Gold Line was similar to that in the air at the central USC, while the amount measured on the Red Line was significantly higher. Sioutas attributed the additional particulate matter in large part to the dust produced by the braking of trains approaching stations in the enclosed environment of the subway.

The bottom line, however, is that the level of air pollutants on either transit line "pale in comparison to the levels of particulate matter that bombard commuters stuck in traffic on the freeways."

While Sioutas, a Gold Line rider himself, supports the use of public transit, particularly in terms of its environmental and health impacts on society, he says buses add to the problem of harmful air. The solution, according to Sioutas, is the expansion of light rail.

You can access the recently-published paper here.

Contact the author of this article or email tips@laist.com with further questions, comments or tips.

Comments [rss]

  • Elevated Monorail to the airports.  Fast and efficient construciton, because of the small foot-print required by the verticle columns.  Light-weight, less costly than rail, no obstruction to traffic, clean, quiet electric power.  Sleek, attractive and inviting to the rider.  And, can be operated privately. 

  • And, thanks to our illustrious traveling/party 'mayor', city council and LAUSD, who can build multi-million dollar taj-mahal like school buildings, but choose to ignore the diesel toxic gas vessels that our school children have been transported in for decades.  One by one, as each school bus accelerates, gushing out diesel fumes to the buses immediately behind as the young students inhale and climb aboard, as reporter Lindsay William-Ross says, "The Carcinogen Express." 

    Perhaps now, our 'mayor,' councilwoman Jan Perry and colleagues will re-prioritize the $300 million+ give-away to AEG and re-direct these funds to the health and welfare of our school children.  Afterall, it was Jan Perry's idea to put a stop to Fast-Food in her district for the concern and health of our cildren.
       

  • Aaron M.

    With this headline most readers will just run with how Metro cause cancer.

  • DonnieK

    You guys totally buried the lead.

    "The bottom line, however, is that the level of air pollutants on either
    transit line 'pale in comparison to the levels of particulate matter
    that bombard commuters stuck in traffic on the freeways.'"

blog comments powered by Disqus

send a tip

tips@laist.com