Meg Whitman speaks at a news conference at the California Republican Convention in Indian Wells, CA last Saturday (AP Photo/Francis Specker)
KCET blogger Brian Doherty takes note of Whitman's non-voting story, additionally linking to his own libertarian-themed post on the subject over at Reason Magazine. "Defending non-voting in bars across this great land, I often hear the ultimate 'shut up'—that if you don't vote, you have no right to complain about politics or society," he wrote back in 2004. "The reality is the exact opposite: By voting, you are playing a game whose rules are that the majority vote winner gets to control the reins of government, in all its unspeakable power. If you complain about the results of the game you chose to play, you're just being a sore loser—or winner."
Another Republican candidate, state Insurance Commissioner Steve Poizner, sees the act of not voting differently and is asking Whitman to drop out of the race. "There's never been a person elected governor anywhere in this country with a voting record like hers," Poizner told the LA Times. "I mean 28 years of not voting at all, not even being registered to vote -- meaning she had no intention of even voting -- is something that will make her really not qualified."




Well then, she should be the perfect candidate for the "I Hate Government" loons.
that makes me like her even more. I'd vote for her (if I bothered to vote)
hahaha
"The reality is the exact opposite: By voting, you are playing a game whose rules are that the majority vote winner gets to control the reins of government, in all its unspeakable power."
This sounds a lot like the same philosophy of the Bob Avakian Communists.
I like to tell people like this that if you turn your back on a steam roller it doesn't make it go away.
Well, Duh. She's a woman. Generally they don't care about politics till their last egg drops.