It's quite a change from the old look, but a welcome one at that. It's more mature and newsie with a hat tip to the past--much better than that corporate turquoise thing that was going on before. There's an interactive tour you can take and over at the Readers' Represenative blog, online managing editor Meredith Artley explains and highlights the key changes made, such as better navigation, the new font (Georgia!), a faster loading video application and other features. Your thoughts?




I loved the redesign, however, when I started to check out the new features the shit just stopped responding. Methinks they did not do enough Safari testing. Looks: great! Works: Not so much.
Looks way better... and easier to navigate towards areas that you're interested in, with little tidbits to see if the story is actually worth reading.
The homepage looks better, but have you tried following an old link to an archived story? LAist might have some. They no workie.
Now, if the Times only had a business model that made the internet version profitable!