<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>LAist: Verdict is in for Lori Drew in the &apos;MySpace Suicide&apos; Case</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2008/11/26/possible_verdicts_in_the_lori_drew.php</link>
<description>All comments for Verdict is in for Lori Drew in the &apos;MySpace Suicide&apos; Case</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2008 la_joshua</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 12:00:00 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>wereofftherails@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>wereofftherails@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>phdiaz</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2008/11/26/possible_verdicts_in_the_lori_drew.php#comment-1527187</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://laist.com/2008/11/26/possible_verdicts_in_the_lori_drew.php#comment-1527187</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 16:51:03 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Is she a horrible human fucking being? Yes? Is it sad that the child was tormented by her? Yes.

Could this all been avoided? Hell yes.

People are focusing on Lori Drew - but where&apos;s the focus on her parent&apos;s failure to realize that her daughter was on a website she wasn&apos;t supposed to be on. Communicating with a &quot;boyfriend&quot; who could have easily been a child predator. You don&apos;t let a 12 year old loose on the internet. It&apos;s just asking for trouble - such as this.

Now, my main problem with this whole thing is that we&apos;re creating laws that seem to punish the assholes in the world, to &quot;protect&quot; our children - but in reality it&apos;s a sneaky way to introduce laws that will make it easier to create the tiered internet the cable/phone companies want. Once you have enough laws making it illegal to violate TOS - then it&apos;ll make sense for us to start paying for the higher bandwidth/entertainment tier they are so eager to charge us that they cannot charge us now. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>field</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2008/11/26/possible_verdicts_in_the_lori_drew.php#comment-1526922</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://laist.com/2008/11/26/possible_verdicts_in_the_lori_drew.php#comment-1526922</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 18:18:00 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;what a dumb fucking cunt
and she&apos;s a mom, fucking come on&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>msmerymac</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2008/11/26/possible_verdicts_in_the_lori_drew.php#comment-1526902</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://laist.com/2008/11/26/possible_verdicts_in_the_lori_drew.php#comment-1526902</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 17:29:36 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;phdiaz, isn&apos;t the point how fucked up it is that an ADULT went to so much trouble to torment a child? It just so happens she picked myspace to do it with. They wanted to find a way to prosecute her so, in Megan&apos;s mother&apos;s words, justice could be served.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>phdiaz</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2008/11/26/possible_verdicts_in_the_lori_drew.php#comment-1526879</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://laist.com/2008/11/26/possible_verdicts_in_the_lori_drew.php#comment-1526879</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 16:43:00 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;So if violating TOS is illegal - then that means people like Perveted Justice.com - can be prosecuted because they create fake accounts to entice would be child predators.

It should also be noted that the girl who committed suicide INTENTIONALLY illegally accessed myspace - as she was 12 when she created the account, and 13 when she died. Up until Feb 08 - myspace TOS explicitly expressed no one under 14. Funny how that recently changed- isn&apos;t it? You can find the TOS that was in effect PRIOR to this case here and the new one begging for more underage kids here

I should also point out that many T1 connections in office buildings (the internet connection) contracts explicitly prohibit the use of peer-to-peer networks,video intense sites(youtube&amp;streaming sites) as well as non-business related sites. Non-business related sites aren&apos;t detailed but it&apos;s obvious that it would be sites like...ohh...laist.com So hey- for those of you who are using a T1 at work - you&apos;re violating the law! 

Doesn&apos;t that sound stupid? Are you intentionally violating the law? Well, if you read this and are still reading at work-  then yes. You are intentionally violating the TOS and somehow that is illegal? Bullshit - see how ridiculous this is? And all because some kid killed herself. I wonder how she would have acted (or WHO she would&apos;ve killed) had she had a boyfriend in real life and not some internet boyfriend.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>jk77</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2008/11/26/possible_verdicts_in_the_lori_drew.php#comment-1526873</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://laist.com/2008/11/26/possible_verdicts_in_the_lori_drew.php#comment-1526873</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 16:34:07 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;karma, lady. it&apos;s all about karma...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>grendel20</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2008/11/26/possible_verdicts_in_the_lori_drew.php#comment-1526863</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://laist.com/2008/11/26/possible_verdicts_in_the_lori_drew.php#comment-1526863</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 16:26:56 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Slow newsday on LAist, eh?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>