Verdict is in for Lori Drew in the 'MySpace Suicide' Case

Lori Drew MySpace Trial verdict
Lori Drew, left, and her daughter Sarah, arrive at federal court | AP Photo/Nick Ut

Lori Drew was cleared of felony charges today in Los Angeles. However, she has been convicted of three misdemeanor counts in the "MySpace suicide" case. Drew had plead not guilty to all counts. She now faces up to three years in prison and a $300,000 fine.

It is believed that Drew's invention of a fraudulant MySpace profile used to romance, torment, and finally dump Megan Meier led to the 13-year old girl's subsequent suicide. According to Wired,

...on Wednesday, jurors found Drew guilty only of three counts of gaining unauthorized access to MySpace for the purpose of obtaining information on Megan Meier — misdemeanors that potentially carry up to a year in prison, but most likely will result in no time in custody. The jury unanimously rejected the three felony computer hacking charges that alleged the unauthorized access was part of a scheme to intentionally inflict emotional distress on Megan.

Drew's attorney H. Dean Stewart announced at a press conference today that he has filed a motion to dismiss. Once Judge George Wu has ruled on that motion, Stewart will decide whether or not to appeal the conviction. Update: A hearing is scheduled for Dec. 29.

According to Associated Press, the jury may have tipped its hand Tuesday. The jury sent a note to the judge late Tuesday asking, "Can we be hung on one count but unanimous on the others?"

In closing arguments Monday, the prosecution stressed the fatal results of Lori Drew's actions -- the suicide of 13-year old Meghan Meier while the defense attempted to keep the jury focused on the counts themselves.

"Lori Drew decided to humiliate a child," O'Brien said in his summation. "The only way she could harm this pretty little girl was with a computer. She chose to use a computer to hurt a little girl and for four weeks she enjoyed it."

The defense said the case is a matter of computer law and accused prosecutors of misleading jurors into thinking it was a murder case.

"If you hadn't heard the indictment read to you, you'd think this was a homicide case," said Dean Steward, a defense attorney. "And it's not a homicide case. This, ladies and gentlemen, is a computer case, and that's what you need to decide."

Emotional reactions to the verdict are all over the internet. Even AP writer Greg Risling sounds upset, using phrases like "...only three minor offenses..." and "...a mean-spirited Internet hoax..." and that's only the first paragraph. The legal community is buzzing about the landmark case. Over on the Law Blog, they are arguing the definition of "intention to inflict emotional distress" and expressing concern over the precedent of violation of "Terms of service" or TOS having been successfully convicted. Eric Goldman makes the interesting observation that many of the messages were not even sent on MySpace, but on AOL, and points out that this is "not the last step in the process".

The White Collar Crime Center hopes the verdict will prove that internet harassment is tantamount to harassment in-person, and that now the laws will be made more stringent.

US Attorney Thomas O'Brien, who prosecuted the case has announced that he is pleased with the verdict and that it "sent a message that "if you are going to . . . go after a little girl, this office as well as other U.S. attorney offices will do anything possible to go after you."

During his press conference, Drew's attorney H. Dean Stewart trash-talked O'Brien and got personal, "He seems to think he's smarter than" the U.S. attorneys in Missouri "who chose not to bring charges against Drew," Steward said. He also stated that O'Brien's decision to bring charges was "to his discredit".

Although she would have preferred that Drew be convicted of a misdemeanor, Megan Meier's mother Tina called the verdicts a victory.

So has Lori Drew learned her lesson? At the press conference today, Stewart stated, “My client was puzzled by the verdict. She feels deep sadness for the fact that Megan took her own life. She doesn’t feel vindicated.”

Email This Entry


Comments (6) [rss]

user-pic

karma, lady. it's all about karma...

So if violating TOS is illegal - then that means people like Perveted Justice.com - can be prosecuted because they create fake accounts to entice would be child predators.

It should also be noted that the girl who committed suicide INTENTIONALLY illegally accessed myspace - as she was 12 when she created the account, and 13 when she died. Up until Feb 08 - myspace TOS explicitly expressed no one under 14. Funny how that recently changed- isn't it? You can find the TOS that was in effect PRIOR to this case here and the new one begging for more underage kids here

I should also point out that many T1 connections in office buildings (the internet connection) contracts explicitly prohibit the use of peer-to-peer networks,video intense sites(youtube&streaming sites) as well as non-business related sites. Non-business related sites aren't detailed but it's obvious that it would be sites like...ohh...laist.com So hey- for those of you who are using a T1 at work - you're violating the law!

Doesn't that sound stupid? Are you intentionally violating the law? Well, if you read this and are still reading at work- then yes. You are intentionally violating the TOS and somehow that is illegal? Bullshit - see how ridiculous this is? And all because some kid killed herself. I wonder how she would have acted (or WHO she would've killed) had she had a boyfriend in real life and not some internet boyfriend.

phdiaz, isn't the point how fucked up it is that an ADULT went to so much trouble to torment a child? It just so happens she picked myspace to do it with. They wanted to find a way to prosecute her so, in Megan's mother's words, justice could be served.

what a dumb fucking cunt
and she's a mom, fucking come on

Is she a horrible human fucking being? Yes? Is it sad that the child was tormented by her? Yes.

Could this all been avoided? Hell yes.

People are focusing on Lori Drew - but where's the focus on her parent's failure to realize that her daughter was on a website she wasn't supposed to be on. Communicating with a "boyfriend" who could have easily been a child predator. You don't let a 12 year old loose on the internet. It's just asking for trouble - such as this.

Now, my main problem with this whole thing is that we're creating laws that seem to punish the assholes in the world, to "protect" our children - but in reality it's a sneaky way to introduce laws that will make it easier to create the tiered internet the cable/phone companies want. Once you have enough laws making it illegal to violate TOS - then it'll make sense for us to start paying for the higher bandwidth/entertainment tier they are so eager to charge us that they cannot charge us now.

Post a comment (Comment Policy)

Tips

About LAist

LAist is a website about Los Angeles. More

Editor: Zach Behrens Co-Editor: Lindsay William-Ross Publisher: Gothamist

Contribute

Latest Tip:

The Cold War Kids are performing live at the Wiltern 1/22/10
[more]

Latest Photo:

Subscribe

Use an RSS reader to stay up to date with the latest news and posts from LAist.

All Our RSS

Links