http://laist.com/2008/09/30/ed_mcmahon_sued_by_merv_griffins_co.php All comments for Ed McMahon Sued by Merv Griffin's Company en-us 2008 la_elise Tue, 30 Sep 2008 15:30:00 -0800 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss elisethompson@hotmail.com elisethompson@hotmail.com 60 http://laist.com/2008/09/30/ed_mcmahon_sued_by_merv_griffins_co.php#comment-1475770 http://laist.com/2008/09/30/ed_mcmahon_sued_by_merv_griffins_co.php#comment-1475770 Comments Tue, 30 Sep 2008 15:58:29 -0800 <p>quite sad really. but that girl on the right is bangin!</p> http://laist.com/2008/09/30/ed_mcmahon_sued_by_merv_griffins_co.php#comment-1475698 http://laist.com/2008/09/30/ed_mcmahon_sued_by_merv_griffins_co.php#comment-1475698 Comments Tue, 30 Sep 2008 14:55:51 -0800 <p>He needs to win the Publishing Clearing House Sweepstakes.</p> http://laist.com/2008/09/30/ed_mcmahon_sued_by_merv_griffins_co.php#comment-1475482 http://laist.com/2008/09/30/ed_mcmahon_sued_by_merv_griffins_co.php#comment-1475482 Comments Tue, 30 Sep 2008 12:42:53 -0800 <p>Jerzy - It should be “lent” but the form “lended” does seem to be creeping into our language. It may be that both forms become acceptable, given more time (this is a pattern seen with other words, like “leaned” and “leant” for the past version of “lean”.)</p> http://laist.com/2008/09/30/ed_mcmahon_sued_by_merv_griffins_co.php#comment-1475436 http://laist.com/2008/09/30/ed_mcmahon_sued_by_merv_griffins_co.php#comment-1475436 Comments Tue, 30 Sep 2008 12:25:40 -0800 <p>lended? don't you mean "lent"</p>