LAist: LA Drops from #3 to #16 on Forbes' List of 'Best Cities for Singles'

estarla

Mon, 08 Sep 2008 10:48:33 -0800

Is "undateable" code for ugly?

savvysearch

Sun, 07 Sep 2008 20:07:23 -0800

Think of it this way: The higher you are on the list, the more undateable you are, hence making a city full of singles.

photo_la

Sun, 07 Sep 2008 15:35:05 -0800

Well the fact they even have Detroit on their list proves they made the whole thing up.

brainylagirl

Sat, 06 Sep 2008 23:55:53 -0800

Los Angeles is only a terrible (i.e., 16th ranked) city in which to be single, if your goal is to become attached. PS - Only 29% single? That seems awfully low to me. That mustn't include divorcees.

estarla

Sat, 06 Sep 2008 17:31:28 -0800

You bring up good points, as in Who DID they ask? Or maybe we're taking this a little too personally. Seriously - who has a *positive* opinion about Los Angeles outside of L.A. itself? You know EVERYONE judges us. ;)