July 15, 2008
Traffic, Explained
Councilman Eric Garcetti once explained to a group of people that traffic is a sign, a good sign. A sign of a strong economy. If there was no economy, people wouldn't be traveling to their jobs, thus causing traffic.
Today in the print edition (and in the blog yesterday), LA Times' Road Sage, Steve Hymon, backs that theory up. He shows two different maps: one of population density and another of job density.
"The maps together show that a lot of the jobs and the people are concentrated in different places. Thus, people have to drive to get where they're going." And that's one big reason why we have traffic.
Photo by 4x4jeepchick via Flickr



[ report this ]
Um, duh? People live over there, work over here, traffic ensues, haven't we always known this?
[ report this ]
Um, isn't traffic a sign of lagging infrastructure that holds back economic development by wasting time and resources people would otherwise be dedicating to the job/spending they're trying to reach?
[ report this ]
Everyone who lives close to work, quit your job and go work across town, or if you use public transit or bike, drive instead, so we can strengthen our economy.
[ report this ]
I pay West Side rents because I work on the West Side. I'd much rather be a hipster douchebag, and live in Silverlake, but, I work in Santa Monica.
[ report this ]
i live in the westside also and cant even leave the area due to the traffic. why leave the westside you ask -- for one thing, it's difficult to find anything decent and affordable to eat around here without having to wait. i have to settle for mediocre food at affordable prices with little to no wait time.
i eat out... a lot.
[ report this ]
oh wagon monster.. i feel the same way. maybe we can be westside douchebags together.
tp4free- call in to fritto misto, or go early for dinner.. taco plus is reasonable & delicious.
[ report this ]
Good posting, Zach. To be clear, I mentioned that there are some cities that have no traffic and that this is a reflection of the lack of economic depression (e.g., Detroit in recent years, etc.). LA's traffic, which needs to be solved, is nevertheless a reflection on some level that people still want to be in LA and that there is a lot of economic activity here.
That said, I believe that traffic is the most important issue we have to solve in our city, from the pollution it causes, the frustration it brings about, and the lost economic efficiency that results from long commutes in inadequate infrastructure.
One of the main drivers of traffic is the spatial mismatch between jobs and homes that exists in the city. Several factors have led to this mismatch - land prices, the previously low cost of gas and driving in general, and subsequent development focused around the automobile.
In regards to Hollywood, it is a main activity center for the City of Los Angeles, and therefore, not only does the area experience the traffic from those who work and live in this area on a daily basis, congestion is created from discretionary trips that people make to go eat, get a haircut, shop, or watch a movie. And yes, these discretionary trips are the sign of a good economy. So, while we don't advocate for congestion, and we do notice that there is a positive correlation to the economy, it also signals to us that we need to improve options for transit, walking, and biking - all things that we have or are currently working on.
We also need to do everything we can to overcome the lousy planning of the past, where very little consideration was given to the balance between retail, jobs, and housing because our past leaders thought it would always be easy and convenient to get in a vehicle and drive quickly across large distances to our next stop. There are some communities where more people are living closer to where they work and play and this helps improve traffic for everyone.
Thanks for keeping the conversation going. We will update you as we continue some of our efforts to measure the jobs-housing imbalance (we are working on this now with some local universities) and as we look at creative and effective ways of mitigating that imbalance.
Eric
[ report this ]
"...not only does the area experience the traffic from those who work and live in this area on a daily basis, congestion is created from discretionary trips that people make to go eat, get a haircut, shop, or watch a movie."
That could be solved with better, more frequent, and later hours for the DASH service. $.25 for a ride that gets a person close to where they want to go will inspire them to leave that car at home.
[ report this ]
I agree jrb. I really hope for a strong and frequent local circulator system wherever I live, work and play in the city.