Got A Tip?
tips2.jpg
About LAist

LAist is a website about Los Angeles. More

Editor: Zach Behrens Publisher: Gothamist

About | Archive | Contact | Mobile | RSS | Staff

Categories
Recent Comments
Favorites
Contribute

Latest tip:

<a href="http://www.cinemablend.com/new/Mysterious-Indiana-Jones-Hats-Invade-Cities-1052 [more]

 

Latest link:

 

Latest Photo:

 

Subscribe
Use an RSS reader to stay up to date with the latest news and posts from LAist.
Neighborhood Project, Los Angeles Communities

Links

July 11, 2008

Senator Calls for President to Implement Car Idling Law

engine_idling_nyc.jpgYesterday, Iowa Senator Charles Grassley wrote a letter to President George Bush asking him to consider taking a stand against car idling in Washington D.C.

"While people across the country are looking for ways to reduce their fuel burden by using less, the federal government doesn’t appear to be taking the same steps to reduce wasteful energy consumption and save taxpayer money," he wrote. "Each and every day, there are likely dozens, if not hundreds of federal government SUVs and sedans idling for hours in Washington alone while waiting for their passengers. Some of the biggest culprits of this practice are vehicles attending to cabinet secretaries, deputy secretaries and assistant secretaries."

Anti-idling advocates in Vermont, where an idling law exists affecting school areas, say that "idling your vehicle for more than just 10 seconds uses more fuel than restarting your engine" and that "idling your vehicle for 10 minutes uses as much fuel as it takes to travel 5 miles." California also has an anti-idling law for school buses.

Grassley knows that others may view this as small issue. "Some might say these cases are a spit in the ocean of our energy problems, but the limousines and SUVs of high-level government leaders are important symbols of leadership and their actions are sending a message that they’re out of touch." His full letter is below.

July 10, 2008 The Honorable George W. Bush President of the United States 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20500

Dear President Bush:

Hard-working Americans across the country are struggling to cope with the rising costs for energy. With crude oil at over $135 a barrel and gasoline averaging over $4.00 a gallon, Americans are spending ever more of their family budgets on transportation costs. In my travels across the state of Iowa, I’ve heard from farmers, small businesses, truck drivers and families who are desperately in need of help.

Because of the increased cost for fuel, American’s are forced to take measures to reduce their consumption, either by driving less, combining errands, car pooling, or driving a more fuel efficient vehicle. These measures don’t eliminate the burden of high gas prices, but they’re small steps that can be taken to increase efficiency and reduce consumption. I know you’ll agree that the federal government should be leading in this area, not lagging.

Each and every day, there are likely dozens, if not hundreds of federal government SUVs and sedans idling for hours in Washington alone while waiting for their passengers. Some of the biggest culprits of this practice are vehicles attending to cabinet secretaries, deputy secretaries and assistant secretaries. I understand that in some cases the idling may be necessary. But, I would imagine that in an overwhelming majority of the situations there is no reason for a car or SUV to remain idling for hours on end. Surely there are simple and painless steps the federal government could take to do its part to reduce energy use, including eliminating this wasteful behavior.

Some might say these cases are a spit in the ocean of our energy problems, but the limousines and SUVs of high-level government leaders are important symbols of leadership and their actions are sending a message that they’re out of touch. There are likely thousands of situations such as this where fuel is being wasted by federal employees who have never been instructed to use common sense to reduce fuel use in their daily job duties.

I hope you’ll see fit to challenge the federal bureaucracy to look for ways to eliminate blatantly wasteful behavior that is costing the American taxpayer and also contributing to the high cost of fuel at the pump. I look forward to hearing the actions you intend to take to ensure the efficient use of fuel by federal government employees and vehicles. Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,

Charles E. Grassley
United States Senator

Photo of a sign in New York City by miss rogue via Flickr

Email This Entry







Advertisement: LAist Continues Below!

Comments (17) [rss]

"the limousines and SUVs of high-level government leaders are important symbols of leadership and their actions are sending a message that they’re out of touch."

Which means in nearly all cases they shouldn't even BE limos SUVs.

We should also lower interstate speed-limits. It will lower fuel consumption and decrease traffic accidents.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Maximum_Speed_Law

As an emergency response to the 1973 oil crisis, the U.S. Congress and President Richard Nixon imposed a nationwide 55 mph speed limit in 1974 by requiring the limit as a condition of each state receiving highway funds, a use of the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution.

=======

Cato and The Hertiage Foundation claim it didn't save any fuel or save any lives, but of course they would say that, they're right-wing think tank douche bags.

 

After Stephen Box's couple of stories highlighting government vehicle idling I've been on the look out for it my self. Sure enough the most recent police car I saw in a parking lot was idling, and for quite sometime, without appearing to be in a hurry to get anywhere else. AC couldn't have been an excuse because the window was down. Maybe he had the window down and the AC on for good measure. Our tax money hard at work burning gas to sit in a parking lot.

 

Oh my. A useful and informative post regarding idling vehicles, what a pleasant surprise. Oh and what a coincidence, Stephen Box didn't write it.

 

Everytime I see an idling vehicle article, I get more and more motivated to remove LAist from my RSS feeds.

 

There'll be more. Tell your friends!

 

Soon there will be a backlash of idling motorists congregating at 711's with stereos on after agreeing on a meet up time online. Midnight Drivazz will be born.

 

Fine then.

Given that you don't see any reason to really have anything other than articles written by hippies, for hippies, I don't see any reason why I should even be here.

Although last I checked, it was a blog about LA, which I liked, but the bullshit liberal posts with no contrary opinions are what drove me away. Half the time I'm playing devils advocate just to get some semblance of discussion going aside from, "Omg i totally agree, cause im a hippie too." "i agree with you as well!!" "wow we all agree! that's great!"

The politics are overshadowing the LA part of the blog. Especially this environmental global warming nonsense.

Enjoy it. I'm leaving.

 

Geeze kristinester, why do ya think they call L.A. the left coast?

 

kristinester,

LAist is about LA last time I checked and idling and pollution are a major part of LA. If you haven't gone outside yet and noticed the smog, maybe you should.

Asthma keeping adults, kids home published on July 8th in the Daily News

Bad air can bring on asthma attacks, even in healthy people; tracking air quality and controlling pollution from cars, factories and power plants can help. Read the NRDC article here.

Aside from health issues the money savings add up as well. About.com-Financial Planning suggests: Don't warm your car up by letting it idle. The engine warms up faster when driving than it does when idling, and idling wastes about a quart of gas every 15 minutes. Potential Money Savings: $90/yr.

Now $90/yr might not be much for some, but it adds up when you have hundreds of vehicles idling for hours on end. The city could save thousands of dollars and put the savings towards improving our streets, our Metro system, and our blighted neighborhoods.

 

Gary Se7en: When people idle their vehicles with windows rolled down and AC blasting they have a perfectly good excuse. They are fighting Global Warming.

 

Jedi: Haha, that's a good one. Why stop there, let's all open our refrigerators, that ought to cool the world down a degree or two.

 

I kinda totally agree with Kristenester.

 

I agreed with Kristinester up until she left. Don't pick up your toys and go home! Stay and fight the good fight! Dialogue is fun. Radicals and moderates working together, disagreeing sometimes, agreeing other times, is what gets stuff done.

That said, I'm still not crazy about the Box Car Series: Idling Cars on Parade.

 

I suppose I am in the hippie camp, though that term gets tossed around rather loosely. I know some actual hippies, they are hitch hiking cross country for the Rainbow Gathering and then off to visit Portland. I like being in the midst of bustling Los Angeles.

I think debate of varying opinions is a good thing, and would hate to see some leave the discussion all together because a particular subject of articles. Maybe it's been harped on a lot lately, but I think it's underestimated how much potential energy savings there could be from using our existing resources more efficiently. New types of vehicles or energy sources are things that will be phased in over years, but right now there is much that could be done and it's environmental as well as economic concern.

While everyone debates the pros and cons of high end energy projects like nuclear, or epic solar panel projects, if we just replaced our antiquated electrical cables we could be saving energy worth many power plants several times over. Featured in wired a few years ago it was stated as much as 40% of our power produced is lost just traveling over the cables. Complete efficiency is not possible, but that's nearly half just going poof.

Back to the topic of idling cars, it's seemingly a small deal, but small changes can yield large returns. Airlines suffering from rising fuel costs are investing in lighter weight food carts because over the course of a year and an entire fleet, millions of dollars of jet fuel could be saved by shedding a few measly pounds. Small problems multiplied countless times over become a big deal.

 

Dearest Kristinester,

Why force disagreement?

But yeah, keep playing the devil's advocate: don't leave. It is childish and extremely unattractive. Since you feel everything is liberally biased, how about writing a response to these posts and submit it for publication here, and then all of us agree-ers can comment the hell out of it.

Oh, nevermind.

 

I'm not a hippy–or a hipster–by the way.

 

im not liberal and i write for LAist...although my strong affinity for the clippers might have some people disagreeing

 
Post a comment (Comment Policy)

2003-2008 Gothamist LLC. All rights reserved. Terms of Use & Privacy Policy. We use MovableType.