<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>LAist: Will People Live in the LA Times Building?</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2008/07/07/will_people_live_in_the_la_times_bu.php</link>
<description>All comments for Will People Live in the LA Times Building?</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2008 la_zach</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 10:30:02 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>tincanorange@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>tincanorange@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>brainylagirl</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2008/07/07/will_people_live_in_the_la_times_bu.php#comment-1400628</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://laist.com/2008/07/07/will_people_live_in_the_la_times_bu.php#comment-1400628</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 10:07:20 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;So sad that this place has been virtually mothballed (mothballed by the virtual?).  I was listening to &apos;Which Way LA&apos; the other day and Waren Olney&apos;s guest was saying that Sam Zell didn&apos;t realized what a money-pit he was diving into when he bought the LA Times.  They needed someone with a firm grasp of the deteriorating situation and a vision for change (that wasn&apos;t just pink-slipping tremendous portions of the staff writers) in order to carry this institution into the 21st century.  Having lived in Chicago and watched the dumbing-down of the Trib into nothingness, I didn&apos;t have high hopes when Zell picked up the LAT.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>