<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>LAist: Privatizing Firefighters: Should We be Concerned?</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2008/07/07/privatizing_firefighters_should_we.php</link>
<description>All comments for Privatizing Firefighters: Should We be Concerned?</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2008 la_elise</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 13:30:59 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>elisethompson@hotmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>elisethompson@hotmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>kristinester</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2008/07/07/privatizing_firefighters_should_we.php#comment-1400967</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://laist.com/2008/07/07/privatizing_firefighters_should_we.php#comment-1400967</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 13:49:35 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;@jrb That isn&apos;t necessarily a Libertarian viewpoint. 

Although to be honest, I agree. Natural selection has ceased to exist. If you can&apos;t take care of yourself, feed yourself, clothe yourself, etc., then why should anyone do it for you?*

*Note: This standard doesn&apos;t apply to old people that are infirm. Or babies. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>jeffro</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2008/07/07/privatizing_firefighters_should_we.php#comment-1400823</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://laist.com/2008/07/07/privatizing_firefighters_should_we.php#comment-1400823</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 12:25:48 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;There&apos;s gonna be a hell of a lot more homeless people on the street when the poor neighborhoods burn to the ground because all the competent firefighters are babysitting beverly hills.

On the bright side, the surplus of homeless will cause the free market to drive the price of a freeway entrance windshield wash down to mere pennies.  Your SUVs are gonna glisten like shiny new half-dollars in this wonderful future we&apos;re building.  That&apos;s nice.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>jrb</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2008/07/07/privatizing_firefighters_should_we.php#comment-1400775</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://laist.com/2008/07/07/privatizing_firefighters_should_we.php#comment-1400775</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 11:52:30 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;It&apos;s simply Business 101.&quot;

No, sounds more like typical Libertarian, &quot;I can afford mine, don&apos;t expect me to pay for anyone elses&apos;.&quot; sink or swim type bullshit.

No social responsibility.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>jrb</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2008/07/07/privatizing_firefighters_should_we.php#comment-1400755</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://laist.com/2008/07/07/privatizing_firefighters_should_we.php#comment-1400755</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 11:45:28 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;- what incentive would they have to protect the homes of the poor?&quot;

None.

This issue came up during our last wildfire season...

http://rawstory.com/news/2007/As_public_firefighting_decays_billion_dollar_1210.html

...a good read. 

I&apos;m told that Naomi Klein&apos;s &quot;Shock Doctrine&quot; also discusses the subject. I haven&apos;t read it yet. I&apos;m waiting for the price to go down.

http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_ss_gw?url=search-alias%3Daps&amp;field-keywords=Naomi+Klein+Shock+Doctrine&amp;x=0&amp;y=0&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>scotthenning</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2008/07/07/privatizing_firefighters_should_we.php#comment-1400739</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://laist.com/2008/07/07/privatizing_firefighters_should_we.php#comment-1400739</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 11:39:15 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Wow!

You guys have it all backwards. There is NO INCENTIVE in government run/sponsored programs because there is no competition or accountability!

A free market is RUN and SURVIVES by competition and competency. If you can&apos;t provide a good or service to properly meet or exceed a need you will fail. Free market, independent fire departments would be required to meet perpetually higher standards through competition to merely survive as a profitable franchise.

A program that is funded &quot;no matter what&quot; has absolutely NO incentive to improve. Now, I understand that in this case, it should be noted, saving human lives should be incentive enough to perform. However, inserting a little free market pressure would increase that incentive and thusly improve performance. It&apos;s simply Business 101.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Anti</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2008/07/07/privatizing_firefighters_should_we.php#comment-1400705</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://laist.com/2008/07/07/privatizing_firefighters_should_we.php#comment-1400705</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 11:16:56 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;the privatization of public services will lead to inadequate public services for anyone who isn&apos;t elite and extremely rich. bad.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>