http://laist.com/2008/06/24/at_least_two_metro_crashes_today.php All comments for At Least Two Metro Crashes Today en-us 2008 Matty V Tue, 24 Jun 2008 18:00:00 -0800 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss matt_vannucci@yahoo.com matt_vannucci@yahoo.com 60 http://laist.com/2008/06/24/at_least_two_metro_crashes_today.php#comment-1392489 http://laist.com/2008/06/24/at_least_two_metro_crashes_today.php#comment-1392489 Comments Tue, 24 Jun 2008 18:20:18 -0800 <p>Who said Metro caused the accident? "... a collision between a Blue Line train and a vehicle occurred at 219 W. Washington Blvd. near Grand Ave. According to the Los Angeles Fire Department, the driver turned in front of the train..." The car didn't hit the train, the train hit the car. But that doesn't mean Metro is at fault, it's just what happened. Being the "hitter" doesn't mean you're at fault. </p> http://laist.com/2008/06/24/at_least_two_metro_crashes_today.php#comment-1392468 http://laist.com/2008/06/24/at_least_two_metro_crashes_today.php#comment-1392468 Comments Tue, 24 Jun 2008 17:54:26 -0800 <p>I don't get it. The Blue line has a track, it can't just veer off the road and hit a car. Thank god the Metro driver anticipated the movements. When will the media get it right? Metro didn't cause the accident, some idiot who doesn't know how to look to the left, look to the right, and look to the left before making that turn. Some dumbass driver hit a Blue line train and caused disruption for hundreds of people. Nice going idiot - hope the phone call was worth it. Jackass.</p>