Got A Tip?
tips2.jpg
About LAist

LAist is a website about Los Angeles. More

Editor: Zach Behrens Publisher: Gothamist

About | Archive | Contact | Mobile | RSS | Staff

Categories
Recent Comments
Favorites
Contribute

Latest tip:

More on <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-homeless12-2008oct12,0,4595570.story" re [more]

 

Latest link:

 

Latest Photo:

 

Subscribe
Use an RSS reader to stay up to date with the latest news and posts from LAist.
Neighborhood Project, Los Angeles Communities

Links

June 16, 2008

LAPD Could Lose 500 Narcotic & Anti-Gang Cops, Part 2

lapd_consent_decree46.jpg
Photo by digitalshay via Flickr

In January, the Los Angeles Police Commission agreed with an LAPD federal consent decree that said officers in specialized units dealing with narcotics and gangs must "disclose all of their sole and jointly owned assets, liabilities and income every two years. Refusal to disclose such information would bar officers from working in those units."

And even though officers said they would quit, leave the department or request a transfer if that went into effect, LAPD officials said they had to go through with it. The date for beginning disclosures was set for yesterday, but at the last moment, a judge stopped the order (although he made sure he stated that he "loathed" his decision) to let the LAPD get their ducks in a row and resolve issues with the Los Angeles Police Protective League who vehemently oppose the disclosures.

"The Los Angeles Police Department will abide by the court's temporary restraining order," said First Assistant Chief Jim McDonnell in a prepared statement obtained by the Daily News. "We do however remain ready to move forward with the financial disclosure once a final decision is reached in order to be in compliance with the consent decree." The hearing is set to take place on July 9.

Once set in motion, the new rules will force new officers in gang and narcotics to divulge information within 10 days of beginning the assignment. Officers already working the beat will have two years to comply.

Email This Entry







Advertisement: LAist Continues Below!

Comments (2) [rss]

That sucks. I can understand how that's the easiest way to prevent corruption but that's a serious invasion of privacy. If some dude wants to rent hotel rooms and cheat on his wife, or buy weird things online, or make any other legal but "questionable" purchases, he should be able to do that without everyone in the world knowing about it.

 

I think that those who have something to hide will run. I mean, it's honorable to stand up for one's privacy, but a cop is no different than a movie star. They gave up their privacy when they became civil servants. I say "Good Riddance" to bad rubhish. We can always replace these guys with a better and more trustful crew. Remember; there are always more waiting to replace those who quit.

 
Post a comment (Comment Policy)

2003-2008 Gothamist LLC. All rights reserved. Terms of Use & Privacy Policy. We use MovableType.