<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>LAist: What&apos;s Next for Obama? The Veepstakes</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2008/06/09/whats_next_for.php</link>
<description>All comments for What&apos;s Next for Obama? The Veepstakes</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2008 la_angel</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 08:00:00 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>soysal0@yahoo.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>soysal0@yahoo.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>jrb</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2008/06/09/whats_next_for.php#comment-1380716</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://laist.com/2008/06/09/whats_next_for.php#comment-1380716</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 12:19:52 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Although I think Wes Clark would be more of an asset in ending the Iraq war, I think it&apos;s gonna have to be Hillz. 

Some big Hillary supporters I know are already talking about not bothering to vote now. 

Yea, cut off your nose to spite your face. Real smart. Real mature.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>caliking01</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2008/06/09/whats_next_for.php#comment-1380612</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://laist.com/2008/06/09/whats_next_for.php#comment-1380612</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 10:39:35 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Just bring Hillz on board already.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>torrmoz</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2008/06/09/whats_next_for.php#comment-1380588</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://laist.com/2008/06/09/whats_next_for.php#comment-1380588</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 10:22:18 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;very nice and thorough article, well done.

A few more reasons Webb won&apos;t/shouldn&apos;t be picked as VP:

http://matthewyglesias.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/05/ixnay_on_the_ebbway.php

...Webb basically became a Democrat the day before yesterday, and he has a long history of holding some pretty wingnutty opinions and making some fairly outrageous and offensive statements.

To quote a Rolling Stone profile of the man, just a few years ago he was saying that &quot;Liberals were &apos;cultural Marxists,&apos; and &apos;the upper crust of academia and the pampered salons of Hollywood&apos; were a fifth column waging war on American traditions.&quot;

In 2000, Webb opined that affirmative action was &quot;state-sponsored racism&quot;; that same year he endorsed the ultra-conservative Republican George Allen for the senate.

In 2004, Webb wrote an op-ed for USA Today arguing that John Kerry &quot;deserved condemnation&quot; for his opposition to the Vietnam War (to be fair, in the op-ed Webb is also critical of George Bush; but then again, in the same piece Webb also takes a swipe at the &quot;liberal media&quot;).

Troublingly, he gave [a] glowing endorsement to Mark Moyar&apos;s uber-wingnutty &quot;revisionist&quot; history of the Vietnam War, Triumph Forsaken, which was published in October 2006.

In 1979, in an infamous article in The Washingtonian magazine called &quot;Women Can&apos;t Fight,&quot; Webb argued that women were biologically unsuited to combat and didn&apos;t belong in the military academies. He said that the mere presence of women was &quot;poisoning&quot; the environment for male cadets. 

He also declared that no senior female in a leadership position at the academy won her rank by merit, thereby impugning the accomplishments of every female midshipman and throwing fuel on the smoldering resentments of a vocal minority of disgruntled midshipmen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>