<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>LAist: Vote to Preserve Tenants Rights and Rent Control Today (No on Prop 98)</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2008/06/03/vote_to_preserv.php</link>
<description>All comments for Vote to Preserve Tenants Rights and Rent Control Today (No on Prop 98)</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2008 la_zach</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 23:07:29 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>tincanorange@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>tincanorange@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>Anjali Taneja</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2008/06/03/vote_to_preserv.php#comment-1376898</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://laist.com/2008/06/03/vote_to_preserv.php#comment-1376898</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 19:54:38 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Gotta be optimistic, my friend. :&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Will Campbell</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2008/06/03/vote_to_preserv.php#comment-1376481</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://laist.com/2008/06/03/vote_to_preserv.php#comment-1376481</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 11:03:26 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Throngs of voters? That&apos;s refreshingly optimistic.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Hindinwood</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2008/06/03/vote_to_preserv.php#comment-1376436</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://laist.com/2008/06/03/vote_to_preserv.php#comment-1376436</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 10:33:29 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I have an idea; if you don&apos;t want the government &quot;robbing you at gun point&quot; how about don&apos;t purchase a four unit plus apartment building built before 1978?

Problem solved. Landlords need to wake up to the fact that there&apos;s a finate rental housing supply in Los Angeles and they&apos;re not the only ones who have rights, just because they have the economic advantage.

Additionally, I&apos;m pretty sure Locke was talking about the individual&apos;s right to own personal property through means of labor. This applies much more to the crappy real estate market, and really not at all to the landlord&apos;s divine right to own unlimited rental properties and reap as much profit as possible on the free market.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>