<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>LAist: Downtown Connector: Above or Below?</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2008/05/08/downtown_connec.php</link>
<description>All comments for Downtown Connector: Above or Below?</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2008 la_carrie</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 18:00:40 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>carrielmeathrell@msn.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>carrielmeathrell@msn.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>Militant Angeleno</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2008/05/08/downtown_connec.php#comment-1358810</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://laist.com/2008/05/08/downtown_connec.php#comment-1358810</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 23:23:15 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;The Militant actually prefers an at-grade option for the Downtown Regional Connector. Not only for cost reasons, but as DTLA becomes more and more pedestrian-oriented, be aware that the relative downside to subterranean rail is that it takes a few minutes to go from street level to the platform -- especially in Los Angeles&apos; deep-bore subway, which, due to its seismic-resistant design, is at least 60 feet below street level (NY&apos;s subway is considerably shallower, running literally under the streets, thus taking less time for pedestrians to reach the trains). Having an opportunity for pedestrians to hop on a street-level platform in seconds (as they do in Downtown Long Beach or Pasadena) should be an added option in Downtown Los Angeles. Plus sidewalk development by the stations would soar...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>