<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>LAist: Earthquake! But Not in LA, 5.2 Strikes Illinois and Beyond</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2008/04/18/earthquake_but.php</link>
<description>All comments for Earthquake! But Not in LA, 5.2 Strikes Illinois and Beyond</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2008 la_jeremy</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 18:00:00 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>jeremy.oberstein@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>jeremy.oberstein@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>rmortiz</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2008/04/18/earthquake_but.php#comment-1341790</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://laist.com/2008/04/18/earthquake_but.php#comment-1341790</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 09:54:37 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;The New Madrid zone has never experienced multiple 9s and 10s on the Richter scale(or the Moment Magnitude scale for that matter). Maybe on the Mercalli Intensity Scale, but not the Richter scale. Yes, in the early 1800&apos;s New Madrid was rocking and rolling with  a series of large quakes, but you are overstating the size of these earthquakes by 1 and 2 orders of magnitude respectivly, since the Richter scale is a base-10 log scale.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>