About LAist

LAist is a website about Los Angeles. More

Editor: Zach Behrens Publisher: Gothamist

About | Archive | Contact | Mobile | RSS | Staff

Categories
Recent Comments
Favorites
Contribute

Latest tip:

<a href="http://www.bannedinhollywood.com/breaking-maxim-magazine-will-begin-terget-demographic-m [more]

 

Latest link:

 

Latest Photo:

 

Subscribe
Use an RSS reader to stay up to date with the latest news and posts from LAist.
Neighborhood Project, Los Angeles Communities

Links

April 18, 2008

Comment of the Week: This is Why There's No LAX Train

Green Line Extension to LAX
Photo by alistairmcmillan via Flickr

In response to a comment in yesterday's piece, Train to LAX Getting Closer, Metro Doesn't Want It, Kymberliegh Richards writes a good history of what happened and why. Richards runs a website called the San Fernando Valley Transit Insider as well as a Metro San Fernando Valley Governance Council member and a board of directors member at the Southern California Transit Advocates.

I always love seeing people who say the Green Line to LAX "should have been done in the first place" as if there was some deficiency in the thought process.

With even the smallest amount of research, one can discover that the Los Angeles County Transportation Commission (one of the two predecessor agencies to today's Metro) originally intended the Green Line to operate to the transit center on 96th St. just east of LAX, but other agencies got in the way. Notably, the FAA claimed that the overhead power wires would pose a hazard to aircraft on approach to runways, even though those wires would be not much higher off the ground than the rail vehicles!

It is a testament to LACTC's desire to have the LAX connection that, even after they acquiesced to the pressure and realigned the Green Line to El Segundo, they left in the branch foundation just west of Aviation Station in the hopes that it would still go to the airport someday.

The problem with a Green Line construction authority is that -- unlike the authority that built the Gold Line to Pasadena or the one that is presently constructing the Expo Line -- the Green Line is not in line yet for [b]any[/b] funding and therefore Metro is right in saying it would place the project in competition with the rest of the projects in the region which already have designs ready to go.

Much as I like Jenny Oropeza, she is putting the cart before the horse, just as the bill that was introduced (and failed) last year did. Before we create a new layer of bureaucracy over this worthwhile project, we need to make sure it is included in the Metro Long Range Transportation Plan (for which the comment period ends next week), and ranked high enough that it becomes eligible for funds. It is the LRTP that the state and federal funding authorities look at when they are deciding what gets the money.

Email This Entry







Advertisement: LAist Continues Below!

Comments (4) [rss]

Wires? I thought they would claim some kind of post-911 security risk, like a trainload of explosives.

 

As much as I admire Ms. Richards' efforts, there is no justification for a Green Line to LAX.

Whether the line stops at the LAX bus terminal, or at the Aviation station, you'll still need to hop a shuttle to get to the terminals. Why spend half a billion dollars for no gain?

Even if the line was extended east to the Amtrak station, how few net additional riders will ever take it to the airport? No one with a brain takes rail from LAX to downtown, with at least three faster bus options (42, 439, and Flyaway). Maybe if the Greenline went north from LAX, elevated on Lincoln, and mated with the Expo line east, on a express track to downtown, it would make some sense, but even that route is plagued with all sorts of obstacles, which mean a taxi or van is still much faster.

All of this talk continues while city officials and neighborhood council fools do all they can to limit LAX capacity. Why should we invest in enhanced infrastructure if the politicians are chasing the growth out of town?

 

metroist, you may know better than me, but I believe I heard that at least one proposal for the extension woul be a distributor train from the aviation station that would hit each terminal.

 

For the record, I am not taking any position on an eastern extension of the Green Line to the Amtrak/Metrolink station in Norwalk.

I am saying that the LAX extension needs to be in the Long Range Transportation Plan if it is ever to be constructed, and that absent that critical step, it does not matter what Ms. Oropeza or any other legislator proposes.

Thanks, Zach, for breaking out my comment on the earlier article.

 
Post a comment (Comment Policy)

2003-2008 Gothamist LLC. All rights reserved. Terms of Use & Privacy Policy. We use MovableType.