<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>LAist: LA Times:  Meet Your New Boss (Yes, Another One)</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2008/02/15/la_times_meet_y.php</link>
<description>All comments for LA Times:  Meet Your New Boss (Yes, Another One)</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2008 la_jeremy</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 18:00:00 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>jeremy.oberstein@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>jeremy.oberstein@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>KG</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2008/02/15/la_times_meet_y.php#comment-1293297</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://laist.com/2008/02/15/la_times_meet_y.php#comment-1293297</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 20:16:39 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Regardless of Mr. Stanton&apos;s resume and lack of international experience. If he is a Dodger fan then that&apos;s good enough for me. Because, then maybe their local coverage will improve. Honestly the New York Times covers LA better than the LA Times. 

For example the New York Times had a story about the  BCAM at LACMA a full day ahead of the Grand Opening.
Come on, let&apos;s make the LA TIMES a great local paper first an then, only then a paper with international reach. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>