<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>LAist: Private Funding for the &apos;Subway to the Sea&apos;</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2008/01/01/post_21.php</link>
<description>All comments for Private Funding for the &apos;Subway to the Sea&apos;</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2008 la_jeremy</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 18:00:00 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>jeremy.oberstein@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>jeremy.oberstein@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>Kymberleigh</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2008/01/01/post_21.php#comment-1263459</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://laist.com/2008/01/01/post_21.php#comment-1263459</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 13:07:59 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Public-private partnerships, such as you propose, only work when a project will operate through or into areas where development will allow the private  sector to recoup its investment.

Sadly, the subway goes through areas that are completely developed and not likely to be redeveloped.  It will be as difficult to interest private money for the Purple Line as it would be to push a rope uphill.

Now on the other hand, the Gold Line extension to Claremont could benefit from the strategy ...
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>