LAist: My 10 Steamy Days with a 19-Year-Old Swedish Sex Kitten, Part I

Elise Thompson

Tue, 18 Dec 2007 20:22:46 -0800

Dear Penthouse, I never believed it could happen to me...

goodnightdean

Tue, 18 Dec 2007 14:02:44 -0800

...i dont get it. this is horrible writing.

coolm

Tue, 18 Dec 2007 13:16:50 -0800

"My Facebook page rocks"? What are you...12?

la_rossjeff

Tue, 18 Dec 2007 11:29:19 -0800

Utt73 blarted out: "He can't date women his age because they figured out that he's emotionally still only 19. Are you going to take her down near USC to get her a fake ID so you don't have to be the "creepy old man" at the juice bar and all-ages concerts for two more years?" Now, pay attention guys, because this is important. Utt's comments reveal some interesting and usually unchallenged ideas about how the entire men/women/sex/dating thing ought to work. First and foremost, I thinking "dating" women of any age SUCKS. "Dating" is a horribly archaic, sloppy, socially-imposed set of rituals that usually only profits the entertainment, restaurant, gift industry, and those few folks who have the cash/status/good looks to make it work for them. For men, dating is a form of gambling. Maybe you'll "get lucky". Dating requires men to use one or more of the 5 B's: Bullying Begging Buying BS Booze So right out of the chute, Utt is still thinking in terms of a game I don't wish to play and that you smart guys don't have to play either if you know how to capture and lead a woman's imagination and emotions and screen for the women you truly desire. In that case, dating is for women you are ALREADY SLEEPING WITH. Did you get that, Utt? Utt's second flub up is the notion that I have to go to some "location" to meet desirable women. But it isn't about what location to go to. That's another hide bound, archaic idea. It's about walking through the world in a way where your vibe is so attractive, you draw and attract women wherever you go. As far as emotional age: I would say that one indication that someone has a relatively low level of maturity is that they have to resort to stereotypes and knee-jerk reactivity rather than thoughtful discussion. Guys, there is nothing wrong at all with you saying "no" to current social rituals that turn you into a beggar, a bullier, a boozer, a bullshitter or a buyer. Learn to use your vibe and your ability to capture and lead a woman's imagination and emotions and the "dating" will take place between the sheets. Where you go afterwards and what you do should be your choice. RJ 93/93

la_rossjeff

Mon, 17 Dec 2007 20:36:37 -0800

HC, Now that was fucking funny! Ha ha ha! At last, an original comment! Congrats...you win a free 1/2 consult with me. RJ 93/93

hc

Mon, 17 Dec 2007 20:25:00 -0800

RJ, the Regal Beagle called. Jack and Larry are out of pick-up lines and need your help.

hc

Mon, 17 Dec 2007 17:33:44 -0800

Ohmigod. I just looked at his facebook page. I need to take a shower now. He looks really skeevy.

futureperfect

Mon, 17 Dec 2007 12:34:59 -0800

are you lying about your age on your match.com profile?

debaser

Mon, 17 Dec 2007 12:16:59 -0800

blatant offensive qualities aside, this has to do with LA because...? hmm.

Hindinwood

Mon, 17 Dec 2007 10:48:01 -0800

Booooriiiing!

la_rossjeff

Mon, 17 Dec 2007 08:13:27 -0800

Oh, why you are at it, check out my profile on Match.com. My user name is VajraMDR. I'm sure the ladies on here will be creaming themselves!

la_rossjeff

Mon, 17 Dec 2007 08:12:43 -0800

RatP, Myspace? Nah, try me on Facebook. Just type in "Ross Jeffries" in the search box, My Facebook page rocks! RJ 93/93

la_rossjeff

Mon, 17 Dec 2007 08:12:37 -0800

RatP, Myspace? Nah, try me on Facebook. Just type in "Ross Jeffries" in the search box, My Facebook page rocks! RJ 93/93

CreativeForce

Sun, 16 Dec 2007 22:57:45 -0800

Second ratpicnic. Shit, why did I post.

ratpicnic

Sun, 16 Dec 2007 22:30:55 -0800

The funny thing is if there was less comments on Ross Jeffries' posts LAist would probably stop posting them. Negative or not, it gets hits, and that means more advertisers. If you really disdain his posts (as I can tell most do) don't even click on it and eventually he'll be talking about his "Speed Seduction (r)" exclusively on his MySpace account, with his only three friends.

arlette

Sun, 16 Dec 2007 18:37:09 -0800

A dude nailing a hot 19-year-old and posting pictures of her: sure, we all like photos. Writing about it in a way that's compelling or funny or hot or detailing some human connection: awesome. ME nailing a hot 19-year-old: hell yes! But this? I'm not sure if it's supposed to be making me jealous, or hot, or anxious to buy some magic cure-all with a registered trademark after it, but it's not working. All it's making me do is roll my eyes. What's this have to do with LA life? Why is it even here? Anyway, freedom of speech is great, and so's the freedom to ignore. Please keep labeling those posts clearly, so I can keep skipping 'em. Thank you!

OptimusPrime

Sun, 16 Dec 2007 17:30:44 -0800

The reason there is so much commentary on this shite is because it is inflammatory, sexist, manipulative bullshit, NOT because it has something positive or interesting to offer. It's simply salacious crap written for the sake of being salacious, and frankly, it's not novel or different or representative of a "Los Angeles" specific viewpoint. I would be happy to write some kind of blog here in an exaggerated tone of man-hating Lorena Bobbitt-ensity where I advocated using men for dates or money and treated them as objects in a sick game. I'm sure it would get pages of blog comments and be "controversial" in the blogosphere. But such a column adds ZERO to LAist.com both in terms of advancing the quality of the site and in terms of representing the supposedly LA-centric theme of the site. What the fuck, guys? Seriously. I can get this from Tucker Max. I can get this from Leykis. I can get this from Neil Strauss. I expect more from LAist, because you have previously shown that this is a site more interested in showing nuanced L.A. Please do not fall victim to the idea currently dominating the culture that the most obnoxious ideas that cause the loudest outcry are the most valuable. Oh, and if you want a picture of RJ, just check out VajraMDR on match. He's solicited many of my friends with supposedly "earnest" messages. Nice to know the truth...

cgabriel

Sun, 16 Dec 2007 16:22:16 -0800

Ok people, who the fuck cares so much? If you dont like it, then dont read it! anyway, RJ, post a damn picture

futureperfect

Sun, 16 Dec 2007 12:41:24 -0800

i decided to move my comments here because i'm sick of looking at that stupid camel humping picture on the other article. it conjures up images in my mind of what it must be like to have sex with this "man," RJ. i don't think i really need to address why calling someone a douche is NOT like calling them an ethnic slur. whoever made the comment about tucker max was right. if you're a man who wants to write about your sexual exploits, you should at least ensure that your writing is entertaining, funny, and compelling. your amateurish writing satisfies none of these requirements. if anything, the comments on these posts are better written and more thought-provoking than anything you're writing. i can't wait for your next installation of "how a desperate man paid a barely legal girl to fly to LA so he could live out his dirty old man fantasies." if i took a big steaming DUMP on my computer i think it would have more literary and journalistic value than this crap.

la_rossjeff

Sun, 16 Dec 2007 11:50:15 -0800

Jdoggy doggy spat thusly: "...the uphill battle of arguing against the preconceived idea that women have that we are going to pillage/exploit/ruin them, and leave nothing but hurt, turmoil and regret in our wake." Wow. What kind of damaged drama-queens are YOU encountering? Part of what I teach in Speed Seduction(R) is to screen out such ladies, and screen for ones who are healthy, fun, adventurous, sexual, open to learning new things and new ways about pleasure, etc, without having to rely on traditional dating courtship rituals that you seem to hold sacred and beyond reproach. You know, when you encounter something unknown, the temptation is to automatically compare it with what you DO know(or think you know), including your stereotypical encounters in the past. Since you bring up "preconceived idea" I suggest you have a preconceived idea(or several of them)about how I teach my students to treat women. Open your eyes, you might learn. "Pernilla" was and is far from the women you describe; she is, in fact, whatever her tender age, one of the smartest, kindest, giving, strong-willed, adventurous, loving, good-natured, funny, tender people I've ever met, and nothing like the sad LA specimens you are describing. I've have more to say about her in the next couple of blog posts, but for now, be assured, we both wound up genuinely adoring each other and I can't wait to see her again. Now, do try to put your knee-jerk reactions on hold and look deeper into what I am ACTUALLY saying as opposed to what you believe you are reading. Peace and piece, RJ "No one has time to understand your pathetic subtlety"...Gary Halbert

la_rossjeff

Sun, 16 Dec 2007 11:25:49 -0800

Amazing. What knee-jerk responses from people who assume they know who I am or what I have to teach. One of my mentors once said, "If you're not offending someone every day, you aren't putting out a strong enough message." The quality of the responses, which amount to little more than insults and ad hominem attacks, show no original thought, indeed little thought at all. Children, if the best you can do is call me "douche", or fling false stereotypes about my appearance, then the best you can do is not much better than calling me "kike" "sheeny" "hebe" "jew-boy" "hook-nose" "Christ-killer" etc. Same level of intelligence, same degree of thoughtfulness. As it is, you guys are responding like 7 year-olds on a playground. Grow up and open your minds. Peace and piece, RJ 93/93 "Love under Will shall be the whole of the Law"

Andy Sternberg

Sun, 16 Dec 2007 11:00:53 -0800

The most interesting commentary all weekend has been regarding this post -- how could it be such a bad, bad thing? On a blog that averages over 20 posts each day, you've gotta expect a few posts that you're not into or would rather skip. Sometimes it's the ensuing discussion that makes the blogosphere so friggen awesome. Rave and/or rant on!

OptimusPrime

Sun, 16 Dec 2007 10:32:43 -0800

Tucker Max. Eric Schaeffer. Done and done. Please, Zach. No more.

utt73

Sun, 16 Dec 2007 09:15:37 -0800

In a city completely overflowing with successful & beautiful women, some skeez thinks he's a big shot for bedding a child he has to import? What a waste of time it must be listening to him about 'seduction' when he resorts to duping kids from other countries... LA women already know this guy's a dirtbag. He can't date women his age because they figured out that he's emotionally still only 19. Are you going to take her down near USC to get her a fake ID so you don't have to be the "creepy old man" at the juice bar and all-ages concerts for two more years? Continue your ways buddy, and you will never know how amazing sex is when the woman really loves you.

jdogmddj

Sun, 16 Dec 2007 04:24:22 -0800

Just thinking about this for a moment ... I (including myself) have plenty of friends who have "hooked up" with A LOT of women, and have never felt the need to post such a misogynistic diatribe about our exploits, which leads me to believe that either (A) you are a sad virgin/loser who has a sad compulsive need to write about non-achieved (i.e. false) exploits, or (B) a very dangerous (i.e. destructive verging on rapist) DOUCHE (to coin the phrase of another poster) scavenger who has the fortune/misfortune of finding the "comfort" of mislead and easily exploitable young girls. DUDE! Get your shit together! We are all in this "game" together. But when you come out, like you have, and essentially say that women/girls are just notches in your bed post, you give men (and especially single and available fun "guys") the uphill battle of arguing against the preconceived idea that women have that we are going to pillage/exploit/ruin them, and leave nothing but hurt, turmoil and regret in our wake. Ladies, please understand, that this "man" is not a representative for us all. We (and I will be so bold to speak for men in general) respect you and want to "make friends." Sincerely, The last great gentleman

TheRealZajac

Sun, 16 Dec 2007 02:45:53 -0800

This is what passes for journalism?

la_rossjeff

Sat, 15 Dec 2007 23:14:44 -0800

Sjörövar-Fabbe farfars far, är minsann en sjusärdles karl, men han blir sjösjuk alla dar, tjohej hadelittan lej. RJ 93/93

shanaynay11

Sat, 15 Dec 2007 19:17:34 -0800

Eh. I've come to expect more from LAist than to continue printing this guy's garbage writing. Seriously - if it was funny, that would be one thing...or if it was thought-provoking (or even provoking), that would be another. But boring and self-involved? I can go sit at a bar and listen to a guy next to me ineloquently describe how he "banged this hot chick last night." Ross Jeffries, if you want us to continue reading your me-me-me posts, why don't you at least make them interesting?

cgabriel

Sat, 15 Dec 2007 17:51:10 -0800

I dont understand why you people are so angry about this story, its light funny and turns us all on. The only complaining should be that there is no picture of this swedish cutie... Thats Blog robbery

doc_rockets

Sat, 15 Dec 2007 17:29:27 -0800

Wow - I didn't think LAist could actually get worse after that arsehole Tony Pierce left, but this is complete shit. Unsubscribe.

April Smear

Sat, 15 Dec 2007 17:20:54 -0800

Seriously Ross, stop sucking your own wrinkled dick. Good job on finding some st00pid 19 year old broad to sleep with you. Since you claim she's so smart, I'm sure she realized that HER birthday gift was to fly thousands of miles just to fuck an old man again. That's real cute.

RMSpuhler

Sat, 15 Dec 2007 16:46:47 -0800

I would have been way too stupid for the Pippi reference. And reading. And breathing. Seriously?

hc

Sat, 15 Dec 2007 15:53:35 -0800

Oh wait. Maybe I stumbled onto a site with the Penthouse Forum rejects by mistake....

hc

Sat, 15 Dec 2007 15:52:32 -0800

I can't believe LAist is publishing this crap.

Bob LLama

Sat, 15 Dec 2007 14:14:11 -0800

"Now, not to brag..." Then don't. Seriously. Not impressed. Don't care.