<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>LAist: The Health of Pornography in LA, Part 2: Sex is Safer in Nevada Brothels than Porn Sets</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2007/11/30/stds_porn_industry_jenna_jameson.php</link>
<description>All comments for The Health of Pornography in LA, Part 2: Sex is Safer in Nevada Brothels than Porn Sets</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2008 Staff</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 17:00:02 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>noreply@gothamist.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>noreply@gothamist.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>MrsT</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2007/11/30/stds_porn_industry_jenna_jameson.php#comment-1243337</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://laist.com/2007/11/30/stds_porn_industry_jenna_jameson.php#comment-1243337</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 10:15:16 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I don&apos;t understand why the actors don&apos;t use the condoms if it&apos;s optional.  Are they privately discouraged by the producers or do they choose on their own not to wear condoms?  I agree with the above statement that people will NOT turn off a porn if they see a f-ing condom, give me a break!  We&apos;re all freaks and we&apos;d keep watching it! &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>