<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>LAist: More Stuff That&apos;s Bad For You: Salt Crackdown? </title>
<link>http://laist.com/2007/11/29/more_stuff_that.php</link>
<description>All comments for More Stuff That&apos;s Bad For You: Salt Crackdown? </description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2008 Staff</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 17:00:02 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>noreply@gothamist.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>noreply@gothamist.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>charmon</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2007/11/29/more_stuff_that.php#comment-1242731</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://laist.com/2007/11/29/more_stuff_that.php#comment-1242731</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 13:22:38 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;But is it the government&apos;s job to regulate what Americans choose to consume?&quot; Obviously there&apos;s a lot of subtly to this argument but for the purposes of the salt issue, I think consumers are very limited on &quot;lower-sodium&quot; choices, so the idea of free will and the ability to choose wisely is really constrained. I&apos;m not sure what that puts me on the issue of regulation, but having more options sure wouldn&apos;t hurt.

Also, your recommendations in the last paragraph are good rules to live by to avoid not only salt, but fat, chemicals, etc. Follow them people!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>