LAist: Beverly Hills Serves LAist with a Search Warrant

guest

Tue, 18 Sep 2007 05:39:13 -0800

Costal cities like LA are a lost cause. You will be under 80 feet of water in under a generation. If America doesn't give up on cars now, you will never cut carbon emissions by the at least 80% necessary to prevent a 2-3 degree C warming before 2030. Unless private cars based on hydrocarbon industry are banned in less than 10 years, it's pretty much a given that LA will be under water within out lifetimes. Go ahead LAPD, hate the bikes. I hope you're a good swimmers.

guest

Sun, 16 Sep 2007 21:00:50 -0800

"What day is it?" "Tuesday." "WRONG! It's NWA day!" "No, no, absolutely not." "It's all right, I've got it under control..." Help! Help! Help! Help th' police!

ben bang

Tue, 11 Sep 2007 13:58:57 -0800

And moments later I stumble across this: http://tinyurl.com/ysm2jm Of course, there is a difference between the law and network censors.

ben bang

Tue, 11 Sep 2007 13:44:19 -0800

Blasphemy? Really? I think not.

Anti

Tue, 11 Sep 2007 12:04:53 -0800

FYI #20, you're incorrect. Free speech has limitations, and if you don't believe me try screaming "there's a FIRE, there's a FIRE!" in a crowded movie theater. But that's not the only instance when your freedom of speech has limits, there are many including: incitement, sedition, defamation, slander/libel, blasphemy, the expression of racial hatred, and conspiracy.

guest

Tue, 11 Sep 2007 11:55:43 -0800

I already have a Homeland Security dossier fifty feet thick, thanks to comment on this and other sites. If they were gonna nail my commie-loving, cop-shooting, Osama-hugging ass, they'd have done it by now. I'm not worried.

guest

Tue, 11 Sep 2007 10:45:28 -0800

Free Speech. What a quaint notion.

guest

Tue, 11 Sep 2007 09:18:44 -0800

"People who actually posted with some constructive criticism will have nothing to worry about. It's the people who took it a little too far that have to worry." actually, the way it works is, nobody should have to worry about what they type here -- free speech anyone?

ben bang

Tue, 11 Sep 2007 08:54:07 -0800

Of course, by "fuck the police" I mean "love the police". Love 'em, love 'em, love 'em.... Gulp.

guest

Mon, 10 Sep 2007 23:53:37 -0800

#4: You seriously still salty about that Joey?

guest

Mon, 10 Sep 2007 23:31:30 -0800

I can hardly read the pale pale text you use for us guests. And we're some of the most interesting people here. I am so glad BH had to sit up and take notice of this. I hope the cop does have to go before the IA, and yes, I hope the license of the SUV that started this whole problem is somehow leaked so we can get in touch with her. Nicely, of course.

Enci

Mon, 10 Sep 2007 21:02:16 -0800

I wish they would get a warrant out for the SUV driver for terrorizing people on the street! And for driver #9, who thinks he owns the road and who probably terrorizes pedestrians and cyclist too when s/he sees them!

guest

Mon, 10 Sep 2007 20:52:05 -0800

Guest #9 "...but fuck the bicyclists who use the street instead of the sidewalk (especially during rush hour). Get out of our fucking way" During rush hour the cyclist will leave you in the dust and you will be getting high on some fumes from the car in front of you. The law says that cyclist have all the right to the road. And bikes don't belong on the sidewalk, that's why it's called sideWALK nor sideRIDE. So chill, enjoy your tunes and the smog and stop harassing cyclists!

guest

Mon, 10 Sep 2007 19:57:14 -0800

"and i review medicine, not drugs." What a joke.

guest

Mon, 10 Sep 2007 18:52:46 -0800

of course this is the direction they're going in. maybe they can slap the person on the wrist like they're gonna do to that cop

Johnny

Mon, 10 Sep 2007 18:20:20 -0800

People who actually posted with some constructive criticism will have nothing to worry about. It's the people who took it a little too far that have to worry.

Mike K

Mon, 10 Sep 2007 18:11:08 -0800

Have you guys checked out some of the comments? Wow. Most of them are sane and calm, and it's a credit to the contributors on LAist that the few offensive comments that were made were rightfully ignored. Nevertheless, there were one or two comments that were more than a little scary, and would be regarded differently if the comments were made in another forum (i.e. snailmail.) Some folks seem to go a bit overboard when posting on-line ("F**** the [insert official establishment here]" is one thing, but making threats are still not cool!)

jamesey

Mon, 10 Sep 2007 18:05:28 -0800

just make up an IP from China and give that to them.

guest

Mon, 10 Sep 2007 17:41:40 -0800

Leave LAist alone but fuck the bicyclists who use the street instead of the sidewalk (especially during rush hour). Get out of our fucking way

polaroidgirl

Mon, 10 Sep 2007 17:35:46 -0800

Jeez... I'm glad I didn't comment on that one!

Anti

Mon, 10 Sep 2007 17:30:14 -0800

In a fit of paranoia i smoked up all the evidence. har har. and i review medicine, not drugs.

guest

Mon, 10 Sep 2007 17:27:09 -0800

I say we do a sit in!

guest

Mon, 10 Sep 2007 17:06:06 -0800

oh yeah, because a server is the perfect place to keep your weed!

guest

Mon, 10 Sep 2007 16:08:59 -0800

Awsome, maybe they'll also find some pot lying around from "Anti's" drug reviews and arrest his ass and Tony Pierce's too.

guest

Mon, 10 Sep 2007 16:03:28 -0800

no , this isn't a police state . why do you ask ? ( posted via tor )

guest

Mon, 10 Sep 2007 16:00:42 -0800

Wow, that seems heavy handed. I doubt it was a real cyclist - they don't tend to be the emailing threats kind.

guest

Mon, 10 Sep 2007 15:50:52 -0800

fuck the police!! and leave LAist alone...