<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>LAist: The Music Industry’s Going Drupal? Have You? DrupalCampLA Is In One Week</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2007/08/31/drupalcampla.php</link>
<description>All comments for The Music Industry’s Going Drupal? Have You? DrupalCampLA Is In One Week</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2008 NeilA</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 15:00:00 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>neilthemod1@blueyonder.co.uk</managingEditor>
<webMaster>neilthemod1@blueyonder.co.uk</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>guest</title>
<link>http://laist.com/2007/08/31/drupalcampla.php#comment-1186880</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://laist.com/2007/08/31/drupalcampla.php#comment-1186880</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 17:32:06 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah, uh....

How is Drupal different from 100% of all the other HTML/CSS pages out there? Because of the CMS?

The user experience is exactly the same.

The record labels have to spend lots of money and time to have cool flash sites? Original design costs more and takes longer. How is that any different from anything else? Eames costs more than IKEA, who knew?

Honestly, presenting Drupal as an alternative to flash is like saying Amtrak has a new, more comfortable train as an alternative to air travel.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>