Got A Tip?
tips2.jpg
About LAist

LAist is a website about Los Angeles. More

Editor: Zach Behrens Publisher: Gothamist

About | Archive | Contact | Mobile | RSS | Staff

Categories
Recent Comments
Favorites
Contribute

Latest tip:

Nic Harcourt is getting a Sunday night show on KCRW, and Studio 360 with Kurt Anderson is [more]

 

Latest link:

 

Latest Photo:

 

Subscribe
Use an RSS reader to stay up to date with the latest news and posts from LAist.
Neighborhood Project, Los Angeles Communities

Links

August 29, 2007

UCLA Football Season Preview

Ben Olson: the savior or another false prophet?Lately, being a UCLA football fan has required an extraordinary amount of patience and persistence. Every year, the Bruin faithful summon up the courage to believe that this year will be the breakthrough that we’ve been waiting for. And for most of the past ten years, we’ve been teased. Like a Michael Bay movie, we keep buying a ticket foolishly holding out hope that this time it will be good, even though deep down we know at the end of the day all we’re going to see are a bunch of things blowing up.

I L-O-V-E all things UCLA. I’ve been spending Saturdays at the Rose Bowl for nearly 20 years, lived my undergrad years in Westwood, use the term ‘Bruin’ in most of my online handles, and drive around in a blue car with a blue alumni plate on it. I hate anything to do with USC, even to the extent that I refused to even consider going to USC for grad school because I thought the mere name would sully my resume. I am as passionate a fan as you will find.

(Before all of you SC fans decide to flame me and say how phenomenally awesome your football program is, let me acknowledge that I have begrudging respect for the SC program based on its tradition and its recent run of success under Pete Carroll, so I will not take any digs at the hated Trojans. If however you decide to start talking smack, I will be forced to respond with endless reminders of ’13-9’, ‘First to 100’, and ’11 NCAA basketball titles’.)

But while I may not be a totally rational fan, I am a reasonable fan. Which is why I enter this football season with great trepidation, despite the fact that expectations are very high.

Henry posted a few weeks ago how excited he was about the prospects of the Bruins’ season, with our twenty returning starters and stellar defense. I wish I could say I shared his enthusiasm, truly believing that the team will run the table and be sitting at 11-0 heading into Rivalry Week. On paper, this team has a ton of talent, worthy of its #14 ranking, a reasonable schedule, and a legitimate expectation to finish at least second in the Pac-10. The team has the most experience of anyone in the conference, with as many as eighteen senior starters. I really want to be optimistic. But let’s just say that through all of the years of following the program, and in particular after watching UCLA during the Dorrell era, I’m a little skeptical.

In my view, it’s a pretty simple gauge as to whether optimists or the skeptics will be vindicated. The season hangs on two simple words.

Ben. Olson.

For those of you not in the know, Olson is the 24-year old junior starting quarterback for the Bruins. Touted as the number one QB prospect coming out of high school, he transferred to UCLA from BYU after one season and two years on an LDS mission. When it was announced that he was coming to Westwood, the buzz within Bruin Nation was tremendous. He was going to be the savior of the program. And after a first game performance against Utah last season when he threw for over 300 yards, he was being anointed as the ‘Southpaw Jesus’. But the sensational debut proved to be his high point of the season, with inconsistent performances and a season-ending knee injury in early October marring what was supposed to be a coronation.

Generally, I hate overemphasizing the quarterback position. It gets all of the glory and deemphasizes the importance of the other 21 guys on the field. However, it is not hard to look at the recent history of the Bruins and notice the correlation between the inconsistent on-field performances and the inconsistent play at the QB spot. Since Bruin legend Cade McNown graduated in 1998, the position has been held by luminaries such as Drew Bennett (who was so bad he moved to WR), Ryan McCann, Cory Paus, Matt Moore, and Drew Olson. Not exactly going to stir up the echoes of Troy Aikman with that list (though Drew Olson had a pretty phenomenal year in 2005).

The reason I bring up the quarterback issue is the fact that the offense pretty much sucked last season. Let’s face it, UCLA is not traditionally known for its defensive prowess, so the fact that the defense was so solid – especially the defensive line – was a revelation. And yet, the team ended up a mediocre 7-6 because it couldn’t score any points. Sure the stats look respectable. But for the most part, the offense suffered from a line that couldn’t create any holes for Chris Markey, the total absence of a vertical threat and red zone playmaker, and horribly unimaginative playcalling (yo, Svoboda, this isn’t Tecmo Bowl, you can run more than four plays). There was a reason Justin Medlock led the country in field goals.

Which leads us back to the quarterback. A quarterback is to an extent limited by the weapons around him. At the same time, a great quarterback is the one guy who can elevate the level of his teammates by virtue of his abilities. And no knock to Ben Olson or Pat Cowan, who played admirably as Ben’s replacement, but there was nothing great about their play last year. It was average. And average doesn’t get you ten-win seasons and BCS bowl appearances like what the Bruins aspire to this year.

The defense should be excellent again this year. Defensive coordinator DeWayne Walker has an aggressive scheme that capitalizes on the Bruins’ team speed, with monsters like Bruce Davis and Brigham Harwell upfront, Reggie Carter at the Will linebacker, and Trey Brown and Chris Horton in the secondary. It looks so excellent, in fact, that it completely pwned (yes, I used the term pwned) the offense during spring and fall practices. And therein lies the big question mark. Can the offense, with a new coordinator in Jay Norvell, open it up and score points consistently? Will the big nasties like Shannon Tevaga and Chris Joseph actually push somebody off the ball this year? Can a guy like speedster Terrence Austin stretch the field? Or is it going to be another season of three-and-outs and drives stalling at the 20? Because if those field goals start turning into touchdowns this year, it could be one helluva season.

The one person that controls this more than anyone is of course Ben Olson. If he’s able to fulfill the immense promise that was projected for him six years ago, he can lead the team to the promised land (no, this isn’t just a recap of Necessary Roughness). But with Cowan out for most of the season with a hamstring tear suffered last week, if Ben doesn’t step up, there is no backup plan.

For much-maligned coach Karl Dorrell, it’s his Degree all-in moment. Although he has a stellar recruiting class coming in next season (currently #2 by both Rivals and Scout), if he can’t win at least nine games with this roster, it’s not ever going to happen, especially considering how much they will lose next year. You can count me in the camp of those that like Karl the man, but are not impressed with Karl the coach and his conservative, play-not-to-lose style. I riffed on the state of the program last season during their abysmal four-game losing streak, and all of that still holds true. Enough with the inconsistency. We’re tired of being an also-ran. Time to go big or go home, Karl.

I was watching last year’s UCLA-USC game on DVR the other day, and after the Trojans’ last-second Hail Mary attempt fell incomplete, Brent Musberger made the comment about how the ‘gutty little Bruins’ rose up to pull off the colossal upset. It was meant entirely as a compliment, but any longtime fan that has seen the program in its better days felt indignant, rather than affirmed. How the hell have we fallen so far to be viewed as ‘gutty little Bruins’, as if we have no business competing with ‘mighty’ USC, a David slaying Goliath? This is freakin’ UCLA, not San Jose St (no diss to the Spartans). We’re not some little directional school in some po-dunk town, we should be good every effing year. I’m not saying compete for national championships every year as they expect at Heritage Hall (though I expect that for us in basketball), but I mean a lot more than just winning seven or eight games.

This is the season that will define which direction the program heads. A regular player on the national scene amongst the Goliaths once again, or just an occasional blip on the radar with the Davids. Whether future autumns will be full of tailgates and 8-claps, or just a distraction until the beginning of basketball season. Ben Olson, it’s up to you.

No pressure or anything.

The Bruins open the season on Saturday in Palo Alto against Stanford at 12:30 pm (PRIME).

AP photo by Danny Moloshek

Email This Entry







Advertisement: LAist Continues Below!

Comments (8) [rss]

Ryan-

As a USC alum and die-hard fan, its quite diffucult to say that I'd much rather read something like this than, for example, anything Stewart Mandel of SI.com writes. Even despite the fact that he blatantly favors SC and this article isn't even about my team. I'm excited to see what emerges with your recruiting class. If I'm not able to get tickets to this years gauntlet, USC vs. UCLA party at my place...Fight on! =)

 

As a blog I guess it's natural that LAist reflects the contributors views and opinions but the favortism of UCLA over USC seems egregious given the tradition of the rivalry, and what I'm sure is a divided readership.

Your coverage of LA's other sports teams seems pretty balanced, why not the two biggest collegiate programs? I'm sure you wouldn't be hard pressed to find someone willing to cover 'SC for you...you could start with Scott Wolf or Ben Malcomson.

 

Hey NickR, our sports editor's name is Adam Rose, who not only does an excellent job covering 'SC, but he also happens to be the Los Angeles Times's USC sports blogger.

If you read LAist on a regular basis, you might just find that we are fairly even-handed in our coverage of both programs. Despite the fact that SC sucks hairy balls, but that's another matter entirely.

Go check out our staff page, read some past entries, and then get back to us, k???

 

My intention isn't to turn this comments section into another Watts Neighborhoood Watch fiasco, but c'mon...

Maybe I just focused too much on posts with titles like 'Why USC Football is Lame' and overlooked the USC Football Season Preview, right?

 

If you noticed that post, you may have also noticed the retort "Why USC Haters are Lame" which ran about a year ago.

Due to my responsibilities with the USC sports blog at latimes.com, I will not be doing coverage of USC sports for LAist, otherwise I would have been all over the football preview. Instead, that means there's a great opportunity for somebody else with the know-how and interest (heck, why not two people? Three?). You up for the task?

 

Just as a minor point of clarification, Musberger's prnouncement that the 'gutty little Bruins' had pulled through wasn't a Musbrerger invention - indeed, it was a moniker coined for the Bruins way back during the days of Tommy Prothro in the 1960s.

The term actually stemmed from the fact that UCLA often defeated USC despite being slower, and generally regarded as less athletic. The term actually was meant as a complient, in so far as UCLA teams were commonly expected to have much greater 'heart' than their USC contemporaries.

Completely agree on all the other points, though. Color me unimpressed with the entire Karl Dorrell era. If he doesn't win at least 10 and make a serious push for the Pac-10 title with the team he has this year, it ain't ever gonna' happen.

 

#6 - Thanks for the comment, I'm definitely familiar with the 1960s reference to the Gary Beban glory days. It's just frustrating that 40 years later, we're still in the same boat - it's nice that we have some players with heart, but there's no reason for the vast disparity in talent that there currently is between the two schools. It's a direct reflection of the fact that the program isn't where it needs to be that we can't bring in the players to consistently be a Top 15 level team, next season's recruiting class notwithstanding.

Ali - even though I'd much prefer you guys to be 0-11 than 11-0 heading into December, hopefully both sides will have something big on the line when we hit the Coliseum. There's nothing better than a big rivalry game!

 

I consider my "Why USC Football is Lame" post to be balanced. =P

Just kidding. But seriously, don't you Trojans have a prestigious school of journalism? My friend once told me he wanted to go there for it but then I just laughed straight into his face for a couple minutes and that was the end of that. You'd think someone would step up to write something about USC's sorry excuse for a football team. Geez.

Adam rocks btw. If I like USC at all it's only because of him.

 
Post a comment (Comment Policy)

2003-2008 Gothamist LLC. All rights reserved. Terms of Use & Privacy Policy. We use MovableType.