Wake n Bake: Sour Diesel

sourdeezy.jpg

Most people start their day off with a nice shower or a cup of coffee, not I. My day begins with a nice green bowl of a strong sativa. This strain definitely does the trick for me. Very pungent sent, Sweet in taste and a very smooth smoke all around.

To me this is my double shot espresso in the morning. It puts a smile on my face and gets me ready to endure the madness that this city has to offer.

Video of it in action after the jump.

Photo by LA Scumbag

Email This Entry


Comments (29) [rss]

How does this even qualify as an "article?"

I look to you for the interesting and unique happenings in LA, and you give me this. Well done LAist... journalism at its finest.

dude seriously? first a weed review and now a post about wake and baking? did someone really make a decision that LAist.com needs more pot articles? way to class this joint up.

I think you mean "way to class this BONG up."

Really. Unless you tell me where to get some, this post does me no good.

This is dope i think , that nug looks tasty.

I think this is a article

maybee that guy needs to think..

Does he qualify for being a dork!

hahahaha "class this joint up" that's funny!!!
you commenters are just a bunch of silly billies!

That nugget looks delicious show me more !

I'm all for pot reviews. That being said, this "article" was a bit devoid of substance.

You commentors need to be less elitist and more accepting of subcultures. Weed is definitely a subculture of LA.

And quit applying your conservative definition of journalism to a blog. A blog is not a newspaper for obvious reasons. We say what we want and that is why we are read.

I can say shit piss fuck cunt. I can say Spike Lee has cancer. Who gives a fuck. This is a blog. Enjoy it.

Sour Diesel is prolly my most favorite of all the kush strains.

Actually diesel is not quite a kush, All kushes are heavy indicas as opposed to the sour d which is a sativa. OG Kush smells very similar to Sour D and it's because they're rumored to both stem from the Chem Dog strain.

I prefer a Sativa in the morning, too. Sour Diesel tops the list. A+.

Buddah once simply held up
a lotus flower
and everyone was enlightened

just because some of our "reviews" dont fit inside your narrow view or expectations,
doesn't necessarily mean our review is lacking

it might instead mean that you are not being open
to the nirvana in front of you.

Henry D:

I love me a good bowl. But if you're gonna write something about it, don't just tell me you like to wake up and spark it up. BFD.

Tony Pierce, I don't know what you're talking about, but shit, give me some of what you're smoking.

Here are two things you have to come to accept about LAist:

1) it is run by a bunch of pot heads
2) the writers enjoy the freedom to say anything they want ... but should a commenter try to practice the same freedom of speech, he/she will be ridiculed until he/she is driven away... then we'll be able to just have comments about how wonderful and perfect LAist is

you are cool and all LAist, but you don't take criticism well at all

now disregard my comment and go cry about how i'm only a guest

ROBERT

i love these weed reviews. as i've said before, it's pretty easy to bypass articles on this blog that you're not interested in. just keep scrolling. seriously. quit being so self-righteous - SERIOUSLY.

diss your readership
and you may find your readers
find another blog


seriously, you're going to get positive comments and you're going to get negative comments. But it's undeniably bad form to deride your readership (or "you commentors", as the author put it). Especially since their criticisms were relatively constructive.

And libel laws can be applied to blogs. Spike Lee may be too busy to care but make a few posts claiming that Tom Cruise is gay and see what shows up at your door.

Robert,

who said that i had a problem with commentors practicing their freedom of speech?

it seems to me that you and jeffro feel like its ok for you to comment, but its not ok for us to rebut.

simply replying back to people isnt dissing them.

indeed, bloggers replying back to their commentors is as old as blogging.

Tony, rebuttals are perfectly fine but ought to be worded with respect. #9 is antagonistic in tone. That's my opinion. I think it's great that bloggers are replying back to commentors; interaction is part of the beauty of blogs But an author or editor using the comment section to tell their readers what they 'need to be' is not an impressive standard of etiquette. That sort of response is reactionary and unnecessary.

In this case especially the author's rebuttal didn't even correlate to reader's comments. He tells your readers they need 'to be more accepting of subcultures'. Where did that come from? No one said, "don't report on pot, it isn't part of our community". Readers gave the constructive criticism that 'hey, if you're gonna write about pot, write about more than the fact that you just smoked a bowl.'

Cat owners are a 'subculture' of Los Angeles as well. And maybe someone will write a really insightful or entertaining article for LAist about LA housecats. But if someone writes a post that says all of "some people get up in the morning and feed their dog. I get up in the morning and feed my cat. After the jump, a YouTube video showing me feeding my cat," you should probably expect your readers to call BS on it just as they did on this post.

I meant "you commentors" playfully. No offense I hope. However I disagree that the sarcastic and berating overtones of the first two articles are "constructive" criticisms at all.

Second, I never criticized anyone for practicing freedom of speech. I didn't convey a "take your comments elsewhere" rhetoric. I merely criticized the self-righteous nature of those who scoff at the idea that shit, once in a while there are individuals who actually smoke pot *gasp*. Believe it or not, it really fuckin' happens. Perhaps through MY criticism they may one day alter their world view to accept that people smoke weed. We aren't talking about hallucinogens or amphetamines. If we reviewed porno, there would still be people that would complain "SOME JOURNALISM! WAY TO BE CLASSY LAIST!" There shouldn't be any taboo topic here. Our editor tries to foster a "say anything as long as it isn't offensive racially, religiously, etc" writing environment.

Point being, if weed isn't your cup of tea, it takes about 0.2 seconds to scroll down past it.

Third, you were nitpicking but fine. I will concede that Spike Lee does not have cancer, despite the fact that I keep trying to edit his Wikipedia entry to say so.

may i suggest something? everyone smoke a bowl and calm the f down. i understand where tony was coming from. previous weed reviews have been lambasted in the comments by people who hate the fact that LAist has added this feature - perhaps his back is up about that and he was a little defensive. by the same token, i don't think commentors really need to be armchair english professors - if you don't like what someone writes or the way they write, bypass their articles. it really is that simple. the drama needs to cease.

jeffro and I are on the same page. #19 says it all.

ya jeffro is cool ... i wanna read his blog

Oh my God, now I totally want to post a video of me feeding my cat (and no, I'm not high).

pot is sooo cool and laist is so edgy and wild!

hey Teddy, if youre going to try to be so witty, why not put your name next it? What are you scared of?

Nothing wrong with a little review of what's happening on the other side of mother nature...chillax people...no one here is selling anything to your kids or exorting the masses to light up...even though the masses should seriously consider it. I say keep the reviews!

If you're gonna write an 'opinion' blog, then at least put some opinion in it. Sativa vs. Indica's in the morning? Why? What type of wheat bread goes best with a good Sativa? And why not coffee and Sativa? Dry Fruit Loops or sliced oranges after that?

This was more like a picture boastin' your new stash. Not a review. Step up the reviewing!

I will now go and blow some sativa smoke into my cats face, then laugh and say "He's so high duuude..." I'm from that subculture.

First of all this is some well done Marketing on the journalists part. More than likely he is growing or has a friend growing a nice amount of this nug. He is just getting the readers panties wet over this particular strain so he drives up the demand and profits he will soon make. It obviously made my mouth water. Unfortunately the people who criticised this journalist about this blog don't have an open mind about business or anything for that matter. Instead of wasting your precious Hollywood time writing a blog about how pointless something is why dont you stick a razor up your asshole and check from time to time on how much it bleeds..

Post a comment (Comment Policy)

Tips

About LAist

LAist is a website about Los Angeles. More

Editor: Zach Behrens Co-Editor: Lindsay William-Ross Publisher: Gothamist

Contribute

Latest Tip:

Any ideas why the 110 off/on ramps will be shut down for 1 year starting tomorrow from the hours of
[more]

Latest Photo:

Subscribe

Use an RSS reader to stay up to date with the latest news and posts from LAist.

All Our RSS

Links