
I like to consider myself a green person. I mean every time I leave the house I ask myself if my destination can be reached without a car, which is why I find myself riding a bicycle/subway/bus often. However I always come across others who are gung-ho about nascent eco-trends (drives a Prius, shops only at Whole Foods), who are so caught up in Green Commercialism that they never stop to evaluate its benefit for themselves. You're not positively contributing to the environment just because you drink Fiji water! Oh, and as a side note, the transport of one bottle of Fiji water to your local grocery store burns 1 kilo of fossil fuel, 27 kilos of water, and generates 1.2 pounds of greenhouse gases.
A green conscience itself is not bad for the environment. And a green mind is what I think we definitely need and have in Los Angeles. I can't outright say that something IS bad for the environment, only what CAN be bad for the environment -- which is the point I am trying to make here.
1. The benefits of Hybrid Cars are not clear.
The technology behind the hybrid engine is that it cycles idle power through a massive battery in its engine. News flash: this massive battery dies eventually like every other battery. In this case, this battery dies after 80,000 miles of use on the road, which in SoCal translates to 5 years of driving (based on AAA 15k miles/year). Batteries cannot simply be dumped in a landfill because they are biohazardous. The United States and the UK already are having major issues with creating enough infrastructure to reprocess used batteries, a very costly but necessary expense. Car company executives have been touting "Don't worry, we guarantee that all hybrid car batteries will be recycled." But if we do not have the infrastructure in place to recycle them, where do you think they'll end up? The Third World maybe?
And the inaccurate mileage ratings for hybrid cars? They aren't exactly as efficient as we are lead to believe. The EPA had car companies update their mileage estimates in their car catalogs this year based on new ratings. The Toyota Prius actually gets 45 mpg, The Honda Civic Hybrid gets 45. By the way, the "old-fashioned" gas-run civic still gets 36 mpg.
And what about all of the additional infrastructure being put in place to build hybrid cars, a technology that probably won't make it out of the next decade? Aren't there environmental impacts from all of the new manufacturing plants being erected?
2. Energy-Saving Light Bulbs
Yes, they do save at least 2/3's of the energy that normal light bulbs consume, however they do pose major environmental hazards. Most importantly, they have mercury inside of them. Instead of tossing these in hazardous waste containers like you're supposed to, most people throw them in the trash. Hey assholes, mercury escapes landfills and penetrates the groundwater, which is implicit in a myriad of environmental problems. Their "longer lifespan" ratings on the side of the box are also only achieved if you run the lights for an extended period of time -- which uses energy! In places like Australia and the EU, there is talk of banning conventional light bulbs. How about before we jump on that, we educate people on the environmental risks they pose when not disposed of properly?
Oh and by the way, did you know that energy saving light bulbs can also trigger epilepsy, and cause inflammation in the skin of those who have lupus or eczema?
I've heard that recycling is bullshit. Is that true?
Showtime recently ran an episode of Penn & Teller's Bullshit! saying that Recycling is bullshit; that it's a self-serving myth, that it actually generates a lot of pollution itself, is costly, and is insanely government subsidized. Well I'm going to go ahead and say that they themselves are full of bullshit. They are not scientists, they are fucking magicians. A good rebuttal to their "debunking" show can be found here.
But they do however bring up an important point: recycling is not black and white. There is a middle-ground and we must always struggle with it. Most of the paper that we send off for "recycling" is not actually recycled, but sent to foreign countries to be reused -- like to wipe asses (you think I'm kidding). In addition, endless amounts of energy are used to run recycling plants, not to mention all of the fuel burned to transport cans and bottles to and from the plants. And yes, recycling programs are government subsidized. But what is the alternative? There is simply not enough viable space to create landfills. Sure, there is out in the boonies but it would be costly (even energetically) to ship garbage outside of urban areas to dump it. Not to mention the political shitstorm that ensues every time a city asks another if it can get their trash all up in their shit.
SO WHAT'S THE SOLUTION?
It's only fair that I provide some, right? I hate people who bear bad news then leave you with your thumb up your ass. If I did that myself I would have to hate myself, and I can't do that because we sleep in the same bed. Here's some advice from a guy who doesn't saw midgets in half on Vegas stage:
1. REDUCE. The best solution for decreasing the amount of environmental waste is to not create it in the first place. Recycling is a gray area. Remember the 3 R's with the arrows?
2. Do you need your paper that white? White paper is bleached. The bleaching process uses a lot of water which impacts the environment. The chemicals themselves that are used for bleaching impact the environment also. That's a double-whamie. Use yellow lined paper maybe? And make sure when you buy paper that is labeled chlorine-free (PCF, etc).
3. Don't throw your energy-saving light bulbs in the trash!
4. Drink locally-bottled spring water like Arrowhead. Let the French drink French water, and let the Fijians drink Fiji water!
And finally, use your common sense. Especially when watching Showtime.
Photo by mohawk via Flickr.




I like this.
as part of the "reduce" advice...
get reusable grocery bags! i'm glad to see so many stores now selling them for pretty cheap (ralphs sells them for $1 and target's are $1.50).
it's not easy to get into the habit of taking them out of my trunk every time i go to the grocery store, but i'm getting better. yesterday i remembered mid-shopping and left my cart while i ran to the car to get them. i used four of my own bags and only ended up using one plastic bag for what didn't fit into the ones i brought with me.
they also hold a heck of a lot more than your standard plastic grocery bags.
One more to add, please dispose of your electronics responsibly.
There are numerous e-waste disposal sites that you can google. Retailers like best buy will also collect old cell phones, batteries, printer cartridges.
As electronics get cheaper, smaller and cooler. Upgrading is understandable. Just dont toss your old zach-morris-cell-phone in the black bins.
Hey asshole, who you calling an asshole? What a cocksocking asswipe you are. (That's for that your ridiculously stupid editor.)
But seriously, is there any editorial policy at LAist? Any fact checking? Any honesty? Quoting the "WorldNetDaily" is not going to impress anyone with a brain or access to Google.
http://www.snopes.com/medical/toxins/cfl.asp
Oh, and they can trigger seizures in people who already have light sensitive epilepsy, like any number of fluorescent lights. That's a little different than "triggering epilepsy."
Actually when I used the word asshole I was referring only to you, asshole. What is a "cockSOCKER" anyway? Are you implying that I punch cocks? Cuz that would be both clever and retarded at the same time.
Hey asshole, if you read your own snopes link, you will notice they are saying that the mercury levels in a compact fluorescent light bulb are not lethal to a HUMAN (which is a large animal by the way) IN A HOME. Read the damn post again. I don't give a shit about a single bulb breaking by accident in a home, which happens not-so-often. What DOES happen often is that these bulbs get thrown in the trash and compacted, releasing their 5mg of mercury vapor. This accumulates in landfills, and when it reaches the water table it can have an effect.
Second, when it comes to epileptic pathology you need to check your own facts first. The whole point I was making is that FLUORESCENT LIGHTS can trigger epilepsy because they flash at 50x per second -- and they do. As opposed to using conventional HALOGEN LAMPS which DON'T FLICKER AT ALL and do not trigger epilepsy. Do you follow?
Thank god we actually have editing standards here. If you were my editor I would have to jam a twizzler up my urethra. People who talk shit with a "guest" account get no respect from me.
Regarding hybrid cars and fuel-efficient cars - I just want to put in a word for my car. I bought a new a Scion xA last year and get about 32 mpg (probably 50/50 highway/city driving). I wanted a hybrid but couldn't afford one. I'm really happy with my choice. It gets great gas mileage and looks cute too. Anyway if you're in the market for a fuel-efficient car but can't afford the hybrid I say go for the Scion xA (that's the tiny one, not the boxy one).
Regarding Fiji water - go ahead and buy the Fiji water if you really love those pretty bottles. But then refill the bottle with tap water (or water from your Brita) if you want bottled water while you're out and about.
Any of you who use air conditioning may be tempted to turn off the A/C when you're not home to save energy and money. That's probably okay with a window unit but if you've got central air, you're better off leaving it on at a reasonable temperature instead of turning it off altogether. Generally, you'll use more energy re-cooling the house than leaving the A/C on all day.
One more tip - someone I work with keeps cloth napkins at her desk to use at lunch. I haven't followed her lead yet but I keep thinking it's a good idea and I should get some cloth napkins too.
Thank you for writing this. I sometimes feel like I'm beating my head against a wall when I try and deliver this message.
Here's another thought: Next time you're complaining about gas-guzzling SUVs (which I do - a lot) consider cutting back on the hamburgers. Cattle ranching is responsible for almost 25% of greenhouse gas emissions by the planet as a whole and methane is over 25 times more potent as a greenhouse gas than CO2. Not to mention the rampant de-forestation that is required to maintain and expand cattle ranches. And eating less beef is a way cheaper way to help the planet than buying a new hybrid car.
Okay - so I know this link is from the Christian Science Monitor, so that means many liberals will likely dismiss it out of hand. But before you do - consider that this piece would pretty much be taken as anti-farming by most conservatives, and farmers are (forgive me) a sacred cow to conservatives.
http://www.csmonitor.com/2007/0220/p03s01-ussc.html
Hey Henry D, what are you thoughts on the push for using ethanol as a "green" source of fuel?
You mentioned that hybrids were a technology that wouldnt make it out of the decade...thats kind of how I feel about ethanol. With the methane emissions, deforestation and the fact that its not fit for our engines, it feels as though "someone" really doesnt want us to move towards the electric vehicle.
Kiran - *I* for one, totally agree with you that Ethanol is not the right way to go.
My biggest problem with it is that it doesn't return the same amount of energy when burned that was used to produce it. Plow and plant a field with a diesel tractor. The hydrogen to make ammonia fertilizers is stripped from natural gas. Of course, a diesel tractor is then used to spread the fertilizer. Later it is harvested and shipped to a processing facility, again using diesel. Petroleum, though, is processed with much greater efficiency: pipelines, super-tankers, etc...
Ethanol works well in Brazil, which proponents cite, but they overlook that there it is produced from sugar cane which has more sugar per ton of biomass, and it is planted, grown, harvested, and brought to market largely with pack animals and manual labor...not really a viable option here in the US.
Not a viable option, I have to agree. I was reading that it would take 7 States blanketed with corn fields to run the US...