http://laist.com/2007/07/11/wilshire_subway.php All comments for Wilshire Subway Takes Another Step Today en-us 2008 lindsayrebecca Sun, 22 Jun 2008 14:30:00 -0800 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss lindsay@laist.com lindsay@laist.com 60 http://laist.com/2007/07/11/wilshire_subway.php#comment-1145709 http://laist.com/2007/07/11/wilshire_subway.php#comment-1145709 Comments Thu, 12 Jul 2007 12:20:38 -0800 <p>Yay!</p> http://laist.com/2007/07/11/wilshire_subway.php#comment-1145624 http://laist.com/2007/07/11/wilshire_subway.php#comment-1145624 Comments Thu, 12 Jul 2007 11:37:36 -0800 <p>I CAN HAS SUBWAI?</p> http://laist.com/2007/07/11/wilshire_subway.php#comment-1145351 http://laist.com/2007/07/11/wilshire_subway.php#comment-1145351 Comments Thu, 12 Jul 2007 08:48:08 -0800 <p>Funny they thank Congressman Waxman. It's because of his efforts some decades ago that the federal support for subway tunneling in "methane zones" was ever included. He claims it was due to concerns over the explosion at Ross Dress for Less at Fairfax and 3rd. However, it's pretty clear it was more concern of rich people of Hancock Park everything west of there that poor people be able to quickly and easily get to their hood on a subway. Same reason the BART system stopped in SF and didn't got Marin or San Mateo. Now all that's changed and people realize that we need subways to help alleviate congestion.</p>